Jump to content

Oyster Watch Company--is this precurser to Rolex Oyster??


Recommended Posts

I found this today in my box-o-watches.  It has problems, but it may be worth fixing.  I did a little research and it appears that it might be a watch from a company acquired by Rolex.  I am gonna continue my research, but maybe someone on the forum has some thoughts.

There appears to be a spelling issue with Ralligh...cannot make it out, but there are definitely two "l"s

2021-05-05 13_04_55-Photos.png

2021-05-05 13_04_31-Photos.png

2021-05-05 13_03_53-Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seen exactly the same dial, but the R.W.C. on the case does signify it's a Rolex. 

Well worth servicing.

I got this in a vintage three watch bundle recently, I'm in the process more research now.

It and it's mate definitely in line for service.

DSC08085.JPG

DSC08091.JPG

DSC08100.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a Rolex.

It was made around 1940 for the Canadian market.

The movement is a cal 95 and had rwc stamped below the dial.

It is basically a FHF 30 with some modifications.

There were many different names for them like Oyster Junior Sport, Raleigh, Victory, Sky Rocket, Grenville and some more I forgot.

I have 2 both need parts one needs jewels and one needs hands. I do not always have the cash to spend on my hobby so they have been sitting a while. The crown is going to be a challenge to find or really expensive. It has brevet and oyster on it.

maybe we can be of some help for each other as I have not been able to find the right crown tube for both my watches and your's looks in tact.

I have added some photographs of mine and a copy of the 1940 brochure.

 

 

 

 

IMG_0698.JPEG

IMG_0699.JPEG

IMG_0696.JPEG

IMG_0697.JPEG

1940 - 0710.pdf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tony13 said:

maybe we can be of some help for each other as I have not been able to find the right crown tube for both my watches and your's looks in tact

I am not sure if I want to invest in this piece because finding the parts may be vary hard as you have observed.  It is probably worth some decent change but it seems rare enough that Ebay listings are pretty sparse...so accessing the value will take some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

parts may be vary hard

Nah, the parts you need are quite common and easy to find.

All I need is the measurements of the tube and how it is mounted in the case, a good quality picture from the inside and outside would be really helpful for me.

Further the inner diameter of the hole and outer diameter of the threads.

If you are not too fussy about the crown you can simply use a blank aftermarket 6mm crown or be patient and look for one on Ebay they do show up I just think 150 euro for a crown is too much.

There not that rare if you search for them they show up quite often most people just do not know they have a Rolex.

As for it's value there worth somewhere between 350  for a non runner and 1000 euro for a good one depending on the state of the watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leave it on else you might end up with the same problem as me. ?

Pictures will do. I think the crown tube is screwed in and than later soldered but I did not have the tubes with either of the watches.

I only need to know how it is mounted.

 

 

Edited by Tony13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, let me try and expand on why I think this is right (but maybe misleading at the same time). Wikipedia has a good explanation of surface tension, which is where I got most of the ideas below. The cohesion of the liquid molecules binds them together into the most compact form possible. If there are no external forces acting, this is a sphere. Surface tension is the combined effect of the cohesion between molecules on the surface with others on the surface, as well as the cohesion to molecules just under the surface, causing contraction and the formation of a denser "skin". The way a droplet of a liquid forms on a solid surface is determined by the strength of this cohesive force relative to the adhesive force between the liquid molecules and the surface material. If cohesion >> adhesion, you get a droplet. If cohesion is similar to adhesion, the liquid tends to spread out on the surface and creep away from its original location. Oil doesn't have the same high surface tension that water does, so it is not going to form a really rounded droplet on any surface in the way that water will "bead" on wax. This is where my earlier statement is misleading, but it is still exactly the same principles at work. Drops of oil on an epilamed surface are not going to run off in all directions at the lightest provocation. What the epilame does, I think, is reduce the adhesive force to the surface somewhat, making the weak cohesive force of the oil molecules more effective. The result is less tendency of the oil to spread out and creep, and more tendency to stick together as a cohesive mass. I don't think epilame has any effect on surface tension. That is a property of the liquid and is determined solely by the cohesive forces between the liquid molecules. I also don't think the epilame makes the liquid "stick" to where it is applied. The oil adheres ("sticks") more strongly to a non-treated surface than to a surface treated with epilame. This is why the epilame needs to be removed from the contact surfaces by running dry for a short period. The oil then sticks more readily to the local contact surfaces, where the epilame layer is worn away, than to the surrounding area. The oil sticks together, and is thereby anchored in place as a single body. Interestingly, reducing the adhesion of the oil to the solid surfaces will also reduce capillary action, which is what we rely on if we don't use epilame. Another reason to make sure the epilame is worn away from the spot you want the oil to stay put.    
    • Look up index vs free sprung balances.  The screws are for timing. 
    • I was considering just building a watch from scratch, I've heard the nh35 movements have a lot of case and dial choices and apparently they run poorly when you buy them new so a good service is required. But honestly building a watch like that doesn't interest me. I love fixing things. There's nothing more satisfying to me than taking something broken and making it work again. Plus watches are cool 😎 and easier to store than a car engine! I only had one engine in the dining room and my wife complained. Hopefully the watches will go unnoticed.
    • Hi all, My "practice" watch has a worn our balance pivot, so I ordered a balance complete. Pieces nr 4871 for Unitas 6310. It's probably no big deal, but my original balance wheel has plenty of screws or similar protruding all around, while the new one I got doesn't. What's the purpose of these thingies? I haven't installed it yet, maybe next week. Thanks
    • For those of you who are looking for a Seitz jewel gauge, I just want to make you aware that there may be a good opportunity right now at Tradera.com (Swedish eBay). The site has significantly fewer visitors than eBay and I have made several fantastic deals there. 1500 SEK corresponds to approx. £110/€128/$137 https://www.tradera.com/item/1922/631487681/seitz-urmakarverktyg-matare Just to make sure, I'm not associated with this listing in any way!  
×
×
  • Create New...