Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For about the first time ever, I've managed to do some successful hairspring manipulation and corrected a badly bent hairspring on a Longines 12.68n movement.

It all runs a lot better apart from the 7ms beat error. I did mark the original position of the collet but not accurately enough. The problem is, due to the way the watch is built, I cannot see the pallet fork when it's at rest so therefore cannot determine even in which direction the spring needs to move in relation to the balance wheel. 

How can the direction and amount be ascertained with minimal visual clues?

Secondly, is there a way of adjusting the collet without disassembling the balance each time? 

Posted

Hi is there any mileage in stripping the watch and re fitting the fork/pallet and the balance alone to determine the relationship ?.  Moving the collet whilst mounted in the watch is a dangerous thing to try it is best done off the watch and balance removed from the cock, for safety

  • Like 1
Posted

it would be nice if you give us pictures. Like the hairspring in the watch the timing machine numbers the graphical display of the timing machine. Telling us the beat is fine but what was the amplitude?

21 hours ago, Bonzer said:

Secondly, is there a way of adjusting the collet without disassembling the balance each time

what do you mean by disassembling the balance?

all you have to do is rotate the collet. They make special tools for this basically a screwdriver with a really long taper because of you use the normal screwdriver and wage it in you spread the collet which is very bad./They make tools there are just a very very long taper that you can use the rotate the collet so literally that will drop in with no friction and then you just gently turn it anything that wages into the crack of the collet is very bad. But there's no need to disassemble which is why I am confused with what you're saying?

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi is there any mileage in stripping the watch and re fitting the fork/pallet and the balance alone to determine the relationship ?.  Moving the collet whilst mounted in the watch is a dangerous thing to try it is best done off the watch and balance removed from the cock, for safety

It would be a bit of a pain as I've already oiled everything so I'd imagine the stripped parts would need cleaning and re-oiling?

48 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

 Telling us the beat is fine but what was the amplitude?

The amplitude was between 270 and 300, depending on position. I'll try and get some photos

48 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

what do you mean by disassembling the balance?

Well, as watchweasol says, it's too risky trying to adjust it in place and in addition, it seems like it will be much safer to remove the balance wheel and spring completely from the balance cock before adjusting the collet. Is this correct?

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Bonzer said:

Well, as watchweasol says, it's too risky trying to adjust it in place and in addition, it seems like it will be much safer to remove the balance wheel and spring completely from the balance cock before adjusting the collet. Is this correct?

part of the reason I ask the question was I've seen some people when adjusting beat claim that you have to entirely remove the hairspring and put it back on again. But definitely removing it from the watch from the bridge is a good thing. Another thing I've seen people do is hang the bridge on a balance tack and let it hang which in my case usually will distort the hairspring and try to do it that way but you can't really see what you're doing. The best way is the balance comes out you rotate the collet put it back in.

then there is an alternative way to supposedly tell if you're in beat I'm attaching an image.

beat alternative way.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted

That's an excellent suggestion John, I can see the pallet stones and escape teeth in this movement. I guess the trick is not to put so much power into the train that the escape wheel overpowers the balance wheel, knocking it off it's natural resting position

Posted

sso my understanding from reading the text would be let all the power off  gently wind it until you just  barely see the escape wheel have power on it  but not enough that runs the watch  then the only thing that bothers me about this is it does assume that the banking pins or where there supposed to be and adept stones or where there supposed to be. Because of you look at the drawing anywhere push one of the stones in it would change where it is.  So basically it assumes the escapement is set up correctly  and on vintage watches that becomes problematic..

But still it would give you an idea.. The other thing is if you site from the roller jewel to the balance wheel  and put a Mark on the top of the wheel that corresponds to the roller jewel you can then make sure that is in alignment.. Sometimes watches will conveniently have a screw  in the right place in the balance rim  corresponding where the  roller jewel is..

  • Like 1
Posted

However little you move the hairspring or collet,  you bring some impercision to the dynamic poise and create beat error too.

Persuambly you watch has a fixed stud holder, so there are two ways I try to correct for beat error without disturbing the dynamic poise.

1- Unpin the hairspring off of the stud, run the hairspring passed the stud whilst you are reading beat error on TG. Repin when you zero the beat error, having a long micro-pin for easy removal or repinning makes life easy here. but this is a one way street.

2- You can move the position of impulse pin by altering shape of the bend at the end of terminal curve or the portion of terminal curve passed beyond the regu arm, this is good for cases of small beat error. 

 You specially want to consider these two approaches for chrono grade oscilators. 

Regs

Joe

Posted

Thank you both for your help.

Interesting thought about the adjustment of the hairspring in the stud. When I first refitted the spring, there was a good 10mm of spring that was sticking out the other side of the stud and I got a beat error of 0.5ms! I 'corrected' this and got a higher beat error. 

Fortunately, I left the complete ling micro-pin uncut so I can still move the spring if needed.

Posted
1 minute ago, Bonzer said:

When I first refitted the spring, there was a good 10mm of spring that was sticking out the other side of the stud and I got a beat error of 0.5ms! I 'corrected' this and got a higher beat error. 

I just need a clarification here? So you had surplus spring sticking out and you fixed that by putting it where it's supposed to be? In other words supposed to be at the end somebody just screwed up and pinned it in the wrong place?

As you've discovered you can rotate the collet the change the beat. You can also unpin the hairspring and moving that and also changes the beats. The only problem is the length of the hairspring is used for timekeeping purposes. So if you did not repeat in the hairspring back where you found it conceivably going to have timekeeping issues and of course beat issues conceivably. A lot of times in vintage watches things weren't exactly an exact science and extra hairspring stuck out. It gave them room to adjust things and they just left it that way.

Posted
6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I just need a clarification here? So you had surplus spring sticking out and you fixed that by putting it where it's supposed to be? In other words supposed to be at the end somebody just screwed up and pinned it in the wrong place?

Basically, yes. The hairspring was a a bit bent and sticking out the stud before I did anything. It was running at low amplitude and at circa -100s/d.

Its running at much better amplitude now and around +15 s/d but out of beat.... possibly because I thought I was doing the right thing in reducing the 'spare' length of spring.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...