Jump to content

Washers between roller seat and table


JohnC

Recommended Posts

Hi all. I need some input on an 1883 Waltham 18s I am working on. I found these washers under the roller seat after I removed the roller table. At first I thought I had a friction staff, but this staff was riveted (indeed, the 1883 model predates friction staffs). They are indeed washers, and came off the staff quite easily. I don't know if these are factory, or if someone replaced the roller with an incorrect one at some point, and needed to adjust the fit. Thoughts are appreciated. Picture attached. Many thanks.

IMG_20210420_192019_629.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is reasons like this as a guess as to why the Swiss don't want to sell American watchmakers parts. That's because we are so creative with problem solving.

We would need the dimensions of the staff but I suspect it's not a roller problem but a staff problem.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a guess as to what's going on? I'm attaching the staff sizes below you'll notice that just below the staff your ordering is something that's almost identical except the hub size and it's a Tiny bit too long. So I suppose you could creatively make up for the hub size by using washers. The easy way to tell is just measure the hub and see what size yours is.

Waltham stafs.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JohnR725 awesome thanks, will check and get back.

Glad you posted this as it also confirms for me that this staff comes in 3 pivot sizes. That is a little stressful to me as all I know is I've got a 1365 staff coming. Both existing pivots are broken so measurement is not an option. Good odds I'm going to have to order all 3 and find the right size by process of elimination.

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnC said:

Hi all. I need some input on an 1883 Waltham 18s I am working on. I found these washers under the roller seat after I removed the roller table. At first I thought I had a friction staff, but this staff was riveted (indeed, the 1883 model predates friction staffs). They are indeed washers, and came off the staff quite easily. I don't know if these are factory, or if someone replaced the roller with an incorrect one at some point, and needed to adjust the fit. Thoughts are appreciated. Picture attached. Many thanks.

IMG_20210420_192019_629.jpg

Out of the box thinking by someone who could not get a proper staff.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnC said:

That is a little stressful to me as all I know is I've got a 1365 staff coming.

Is the problem with American balance staffs. People used to Swiss watches sometimes typically one staff. Unless there were variations because of the balance protection system perhaps. But with American staff specially Elgin there can be variations with the same part number as you've noted the pivots size almost always varies with almost all the staffs there's a few that are only one pivots size but almost all of them different pivots sizes. Then if it's a modern replacement staff like typically bestfit its typically over size so you can reduce it to fit.

This means the minimum you have to do is measure the old measure the new and verify their the same? Except it also need to verify that the original fits within the specifications of whatever staff you think is supposed to be there. Hopefully there were no other modifications made to your watch.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JohnR725I measure the height of the hub at 0.96mm, which is within a small margin of 1mm as quoted. The overall length with 2 broken pivots I measured at approx. 5.4mm. Adding 0.3 for each pivot brings us quite close to the 6mm quoted for the 1703. And yes, comparing my staff to pics of the 1703 on eBay, looks the same. I think you nailed it!

Will have to get the 1365 and test the lean in the jewels to figure out if it will work. Might take a while to get this baby running. Fortunately all jewels appear OK and the train is in good shape.

Edited by JohnC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

somewhere in my journey of learning watch repair I learned a rule. Never modify the watch to fit the replacement components. Always modify the component.

I think I might've said or I usually do point out that some staffs have been deliberately made oversize. This allows the watchmaker to reduce the size of the staff. Or I guess you can mutilate the roller table. So yes a very very light broach and maybe even a smoothing broach. Just because we don't know how much has been closed and you don't want to end up with it too big. Maybe a little from each side perhaps.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Nev . No i didn't try this balance in the movement as it didn't run and the deformed staff broke when i removed the roller. Problem is what i think is the correct staff for this movement, the hub seat, roller and collet profiles are all too small for those parts of the assembly. The movement listed on Ranfft's site is correct my movement and the nos staffs i have match the ronda measurements. I can only assume that the wheel , roller and collet openings have all been broached to make them fit an oversized staff, both staff pivots had also been modified. 
    • Yes, threw it on the demagnetizer before I cleaned it to be sure.  This picture doesn't show it well, but I can definitely see liquid where the turns meet up.
    • My newest 404 candidate, a late '60's / early '70's Waltham with a UTC 33 / Seiko 6601 17 jewel automatic movement. It needed a new crystal and I put on a strap from my Strap Graveyard. The timegrapher was a snow storm before servicing but it cleaned up nicely. I really like the funky font used for the hour markers.
    • Hi Rich, the main problem with the balance is if the roller is from this movement. Did Yoy try if the balance interacted correctly with the lever? You can use suitable (by size) balance/hairspring couple from You pile of balances, but the roller must be for this lever (original for the calibre). Not that making roller is impossible, but it is easier to have one.
    • Its ok blueharp the pictures you provided earlier of the 3 keyless components,  the setting lever, the setting lever spring and the yoke plus the brass cover plate should be enough. If they are not listed anywhere then you are relying on any lettering on the movement or someone that just knows the movement from experience. 
×
×
  • Create New...