Jump to content

Upcoming Eta Part Restrictions


Recommended Posts

First of all, sorry I don't have the specifics on hand right now, I recently got a newsletter through from the British guild of watch and clockmakers at work confirming and updating a nagging fear about ETA part restrictions, they announced a date, which if no one else can provide I'll make sure to post it tomorrow when I can read it again.

As far as I can tell, they plan on no longer providing any spare parts to anyone other than Swatch and the various Swiss watchmaking houses that they manage. 

God I see so many problems across the industry with this, I just don't know how any of this will work out.

Anyone have any insights into the situation?

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's not really that simply, no one wants to use Chinese movements/parts, and it leaves the issue of current watches that are fitted with ETA movements, which makes the majority of the upper market of watches, what are we to do about them, just do straight movement exchanges, or keep a bench of movements for salvage, either way, it will make horology more difficult and more expensive.  

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know independents here that have been posting signs in their shops about this since the courts found against the SWATCH group. A number of them have been stockpiling mountains of eta parts and have been supplementing with Chinese parts. One I know has a big sign that says all replacement parts will be Chinese origin unless the customer specifically requests Swiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a good article on how eta painted themselves into a corner. Can't find it now but will keep looking.

By virtue of being the biggest supplier of movements and parts, they could not refuse to supply their products to all comers!

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been quite a long discussion about this here in the past. As I've said before, there will be three probable effects (IMO) on the watch world:

 

1. Repairers will stock s/h parts and the desirability of s/h ETA movements on eBay and other sources will rise

2. Chinese and Japanese watches will kick off in an even bigger way

3. More brand makers will do deals with independent Swiss manufacturers outside the Swatch group.

 

Greed will eventually take its toll...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...