Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

New version of parametric movement holder, link HERE, updated based on feedback from other WRT members and removed a few bugs. I have printed in PLA+ and PETG and prints well, rendering below:

NewMHolder.thumb.png.5c2aa26f8c6d0f76d664c6ea9e82b9b0.png

I uploaded FreeCAD, step and .stl versions to printables web site as this seems to have replaced thingiverse as the go-to place for 3D models - opinions?

Note, parametric functionality only works in the FreeCAD file version

All you need to do is measure your movement outer diameter (OD) and then put this value into the model spreadsheet and it will generate a bespoke model of the holder to fit your movement that will look something like the one above. Depending on your settings the print time will be around 1 hour.

On 4/11/2021 at 7:27 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

I am attaching the Freecad file.  I use Freecad which is open-source software that is heavily supported and it is FREE.  Been using it for three years and love it.

 

STL file also attached, but it is not as useful because it is much harder to edit.

When I get some time, I will parameterize this for easier mods.

movement_holder 2.FCStd 23.36 kB · 15 downloads movement holder.stl 30.16 kB · 11 downloads

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

 

Edited by Waggy
Clarification
  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Waggy said:

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

I don't know how I did it!!  It was a long time ago.  Maybe they changed the file type available.  Here's an idea.  Change the extension to ".jpg" and inform the reader to change it back to ".fcstd"

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hi, guys

I'm very interested in printing out this design as I've seen the orignals used on many occasions and I'm fed up with my movements popping out the standard Bergeon type so want to give this type a go 😀 

As I've never used this type before should the movement be a snug fit in the holder? Once you've measured the diameter of the movement do you put this exact value in the spreadsheet or increase it a little 🤔

Comments would be appreciated 👍  

Posted (edited)

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

I like calibre dedicated holders, i have a strong interest in the Smiths brand and I have just joined a men in sheds group at the end of my road, i am sure my waffle helped me to jump the queue as initially he said there was a waiting list of around 50, should i feel guilty ?They have two 3d printers so that is going to be another learning curve for me.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Nice work.  In the last year, I have been servicing Accutron 218s.  I have the official Accutron hoder that provides electrical contact to the movement.  It is a pretty clever design.  There is a cut in the ring of the holder (shaped like a "C").  When in relaxed state, the holder is slightly smaller than the watch movement.  You spread the cut slightly and drop the movement in and release.  Very clean.  I have made 3D versions of this setup.  Have not explored using it generally for other movements.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I have made 3D versions of this setup.  Have not explored using it generally for other movements.

Would be interesting to see it 🙂

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Edited by Waggy
Posted
3 hours ago, Waggy said:

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Well, when you first posted some time back, I downloaded and ran it through my slicer to get a print time. A bit long for me. Your new idea would solve this. I am anxious to see your progress!!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Printing the prototype holder and ring now:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2415-52-57.png.f1eb78eab05f11fe3283c58b22d35d80.png

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2415-54-33.png.ff91ef462c2d29a4a1ff4cdc4facd6fa.png

I put the bump (keyway) on the holder and ring to stop it spinning

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

Edited by Waggy
Typo
  • Like 6
Posted
3 hours ago, Waggy said:

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 529.65 kB · 3 downloads

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

I'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

RUIPAI-4-Pin-Automatic-Watch-Hand-Installing-and-Fitting-Tools-Watch-Needle-Installation-Tool-for-Watch_jpg__webp_80.thumb.jpg.9ebc33c777a6df63242e03a33d7e07fa.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

Good idea, working on it....

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

Edited by Waggy
slight mod to design
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Here is the insert ring for rectangular or elliptical movements:

Note that the length is the side with the stem cut out on the spreadsheet (in the picture below this is 15.15:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2511-41-55.thumb.png.958d69b67d28a0154c8a2e6a1dde431d.png

Here is the fake pdf file, again you need to convert to .zip after download to access the FreeCAD and 3mf files.

Rectangular insert disc.pdf

 

 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Waggy said:

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 247.9 kB · 1 download

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf 402.5 kB · 1 download

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Posted

I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Waggy said:

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.

mh.thumb.jpg.bd79836f45a8828e19c81bda8a630733.jpg

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted
10 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter

I discovered this last night when I printed my model, I'll try and tweak the design a little and re-post here

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
    • This is indeed a unique site and members including myself genuinely care about it.  All we want is the site to continue. 
    • Hello Mark,  thank you for the ad removal , like JohnR725 , I appreciate any revenue from such would be helpful.  This is the one forum which encourages conversation and social interaction and in that sense it is unique  All the others I frequent can be a little intimidating and answers some what terse some quite rude. I think on here we try to do justice to your site in keeping with your principals. In my opinion it is like no other. The contributors  behave and act like gentlemen and ladies. And long may it continue to be so.
×
×
  • Create New...