Jump to content

Dial Markings


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone!  I hope this message finds you all healthy and well!  So I was having a look at some watches I recently acquired, both Bulova’s with date codes of M6 (1966).  The 2 I was comparing were a Surf King and an Accutron.  So both watches have luminous hands and dials, but I noticed the Surf King had “T” markings indicating tritium but the Accutron does not have any markings indicating lime material. Now with both watches being from 1966 I would assume the Accutron is tritium as well.  I doing some more research, I find the Accutron is made in the USA and the Surf King has “SWISS” between the T’s.  So I’m just curious, would the US and Swiss have different requirements as to the markings of their dials?  Any thoughts would be appreciated!

02AC935C-C275-48AF-91B3-56BB3682536C.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there. Different countries had and still do different regulations,mostly related to tax purposes. Luminosity Explained

Letters SWISS
Luminous material Radium
used until 1960
radioactive

Letters T SWISS - T < 25
luminous material Tritium
used from 1960 until 1998
radioactive, radioactivity less than 925 MBq (25 mCi)

Letters T SWISS T
luminous material Tritium
used from 1960 until 1998
radioactive, radioactivity less than 277 MBq (7,5 mCi)

Letters SWISS OR SWISS MADE
luminous material Superluminova
used from 2000
not radioactive

Then you have the Swiss made markings legislation to protect the integrity of Swiss watch companies 

https://www.cosc.swiss/en/quality/swiss-made-controlled-label

Hope this helps 

Edited by Graziano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Stevelp said:

Hi graziano, I appreciate the reply!  That’s great information!  Thanks for sharing that! So I wonder, would US made Bulova and Swiss made Bulova, even though the same name have different regulations in the respective countries?  

Most of all the 23 jewel Bulova watches were made in the USA. 17 jeweled watches were Swiss. When the 30 jewel jobs came along they were Swiss and US. That said,The rub comes in when you order parts for the US movements,most of the parts are from Switzerland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm currently 3D printing a new basket and trays for my Pearl machine - I printed one last week in PETG material and it worked well at first. I had taken a calibration cube and soaked it in old cleaning fluid for 8 weeks and then measured it, and there was no discernable swelling or shrinkage and the cube seemed mechanically intact. All went well after the cleaning cycles and then onto the drying cycle..... that's when things went awry. The heat was more than I was expecting and the basket and individual trays warped and deformed, I later found out that PETG is rated to 65°C working temperature (PLA = 54°C) I am now trying to print from nylon (working temperature = +/- 100°C, depending on the specific blend) - but it is extremely difficult to print with, my third attempt is chugging away now while I am at work - hopefully I don't go home to a ball of wool like last time! 
    • It is possible to true the pearl basket to run better takes a good hour of filing though.
    • Yes, the general pat is this. On my diagram the points where the springs rises and levels are marked with red circles. This is only to show on all pictures (the ones that doesn't show this points as they are seen only from aside, not from above) where this points are. On You pictures, the pont where the spring rises is not marked. The point where it levels is marked with A. The point B is where the change in radius should start, but there is sharp bend there which should not be that sharp.
    • I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...
    • This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!
×
×
  • Create New...