Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I am trying to restore a Seiko 5M62-0D50 Kinetic. The crystal needed replacing and the face needed aligned as someone (me) had assembled it off by about 5degrees having replaced the capacitor. I don't know if I lost something last time but there seems to be nothing to locate the face relative to the movement. ie it spins freely and once in place, cannot be accessed to correct it. Can anyone give me any pointers?

seiko.jpg

Posted

The dial feet must have broken off. You will need to remove the dial and either

  • attach new ones - I've superglued them on, or they can be soldered (tricky) 
  • use double sided sticky tabs to secure the dial (not great)
  • look for a new dial

Can you remove the dial and post a pic of the back of the dial and movement ?

 

 

Posted

Welcome to the forum JR. 

Mark has done a YouTube video on your very watch with the same problem, well worth watching.

There are other videos dealing with this problem but watch Marks first you'll find it worth while.

Good luck.

Graham

Posted

Yes I agree with the other comments, The dial feet have broken off. New ones can be soldered on  or glued on although with the glue on ones you have to be careful of the calendar work for clearance. I built my own tool for the job and never had a dial spoiled.  Common fault on Seiko's 

Mine is the LH one  the RH one is a Horotec .

OIP (1).jpg

OIP.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, mikepilk said:

 

Can you remove the dial and post a pic of the back of the dial and movement ?

Not sure that I can remove the hands. I'm almost in over my head already. If I pluck up enough courage, I'll post a pic. Thank you for your advice. I would never have guessed dial feet.

 

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Gra said:

 

Mark has done a YouTube video on your very watch with the same problem, well worth watching.

Graham thanks very much for the advice. I don't yet know Mark but Google is my friend. 

 

Posted
16 hours ago, watchweasol said:

  Common fault on Seiko's 

Thank you for this. I was beating myself up for losing a gasket or something. That's a pretty advanced piece of kit that you built. My tools so far don't go much further than decent screwdrivers and a starter kit off ebay:( 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Thank you lads. I would never have solved this riddle on my own. I honestly believed that I had lost something years ago, when I done the capacitor job. That's when the dial went wonky and I have been beating myself up all week because of that. I'd be back on the drink had I not have found this forum. I have replaced the crystal as the old one actually had a hole punched in it. I never felt the impact at the time but I guess that's when the dial feet went walkies:) 

Posted
On 2/23/2021 at 5:10 PM, mikepilk said:

The dial feet must have broken off. You will need to remove the dial and either

  • attach new ones - I've superglued them on, or they can be soldered (tricky) 
  • use double sided sticky tabs to secure the dial (not great)
  • look for a new dial

Can you remove the dial and post a pic of the back of the dial and movement ?

 

 

On 2/23/2021 at 5:10 PM, mikepilk said:

Yeah, I see the problem. Been looking at the solutions and I defo can't do a professional job. I wouldn't touch this with the tools I own. Gonna go for the tape I'm afraid.

 

 

 

Seiko dial.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hi, here is another YouTube video you might find useful, this dial had been glued on with contact adhesive.....nasty ?

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Gra said:

this dial had been glued on with contact adhesive.....nasty ?

Not nasty when recesses are cut first. This tecnique is demonstrated in comparison to soldering by our Host Mark Lovick. 

 

Posted

Hi JDM, was referring to how the watch had been stuck down before the renovation, fabric and contact adhesive. 

Watch was repaired using metal feet and adhesive ?



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel, I guess You actually asked if the accuracy of the watch was improved after jewels added. One would not expect such accuracy improvement. The watch accuracy depends on many things and most of them are related to the balance and escapement. Well, it depends what is considered to be a no jeweled watch. If this is pin pallet watch wit cone balance pivots, then, believe me, replacing balance staff with one with cylindrical pivots in jewels will only worsen the things. Cone shaped pivots in cup bearings actually work better than  cylindrical, the only problem is that they wear faster. And, it will be hard to impossible to replace the pallet pins with ruby pins... The watch accuracy depends maimly on the balance and escapement adjustments ad it is no related to the presence of jewels. Adding jewels to the train wheel bearings may only lead to some amplitude increasing, and it is not sure too.  
    • Thank you so much! I'll experiment a bit with the UV glue and chalk and maybe eventually try to fill the hole.  I'll report back!  
    • How did you know to shorten the bottom pivot and not the top? It sounds like something is rubbing when in the dial up position.
    • With apologies for taking advantage of your kindness in responding, would you be able to indicate what sort of additional info is needed & where on the watch I might find it? Do you have any suggestions as to what Cousins might mean by "a normal  bridle"? ( their website says they can't provide any technical information....)
    • Yeah, it looks exactly like that, but the balance staff pivots was long when fit into the jewels, so I took some  bits shorten it from the bottom pivot but  when  I made the movement run  on all position and all the other position works fine but not on dial up position.  and im not getting any reading from my timegrapher So what do you reckon the issue could be do I need to shorten the bottom pivot more and also a notice the balance rim is really close to the center wheel teeth  feel  it's catching the rim.
×
×
  • Create New...