Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey there, 

I would like to work on just another disassembly, albeit patiently, but I seem to have the wrong cheap watch to start with. 

From the pictures, it could be seen that the case is milled to exactly the movement diameter. In other words, the movement holder is actually an integral part of the case.

This means I can't remove the movement and the dial as a single piece. Instead, I'll have to remove the mineral crystal first, which will likely make the movement and dial removable in one piece. And even if it is not the case, removing the hands safely is certainly better than attempting to remove the movement from the case back side anyway. 

The crystal is definitely mineral, even with an anti scratch coating. The edges are beveled and there's absolutely no way to grip it with the acrylic crystal remover. 

If it helps, the crystal is big, at least 37mm in diameter. 

What are my options? I have my nuclear option but I don't want to act stupid.

Bonus question : what's the movement? It sort of resembles the ST-16, except that it isn't (but I can be wrong) 

IMG_20210204_122521.jpg

IMG_20210204_122507.jpg

IMG_20210204_122351.jpg

Edited by SudoHalt
Posted

If indeed the mvtholder is part of the case(of which I am not sure according to the photos) you can gently put a bench knife between the bezel and the case and take the bezel of, normally the crystal should be held in place by the bezel.

The crystal is a normal crystal, not a very big size.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Watchtime said:

If indeed the mvtholder is part of the case(of which I am not sure according to the photos) you can gently put a bench knife between the bezel and the case and take the bezel of, normally the crystal should be held in place by the bezel.

The crystal is a normal crystal, not a very big size.

 

Thanks a lot. Probably the crystal isn't large, but it's the largest watch I ever laid my hands on!

May I ask, since I have never attempted this, how much force should be required? I have previously removed the rotating bezels on Seikos and Vostoks. Should I expect this one to be as easy, or is there considerably more force required?

On the other hand, I am preparing for the scenario where the bezel is too tight. Apart from breaking the crystal, I got another stupid idea... Since I am able to feel the crystal gasket by my nails, do you think it's a reasonable idea to attempt to rupture the crystal gasket by the means of a razor, in order to free the crystal?

Posted

As said by watchtime I also agree with his comments and would think that the bezel removes with the crystal intact. Some require a fair degree of force to remove and may need a tool such as the tool attached.  Refrain from trying to work the crystal out as this may lead to damage of the bezel and the crystal seating and ruin the gasket.

s-l1600.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, SudoHalt said:

 Since I am able to feel the crystal gasket by my nails, do you think it's a reasonable idea to attempt to rupture the crystal gasket by the means of a razor, in order to free the crystal?

No I don't think is a reasonable idea. A caseback press that can also do some crystal work is very cheap. In watchmaking as well other trades the idea is that one tries hard to repair, not break things. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Depends on the wtch/brand. What brand is it? Can you post a photo of the front of the watch. It is supposed to keep water out so it should not be very loose...?

Take a razor blade or a sharp bench knife to get it off, you can put a piece of gaffer tape on the bezel/cae and cut through it. You wan;t get scratches then....I am wondering where you feel the gasket? Not on the front I guess? To be sure, have a replacement gasket ready, When replacing crystals with gaskets, I change these too.

Edited by Watchtime
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We the human beings never see our own aging.      
    • Hello Tom and welcome to the forum.
    • Hah! Well, California will have to do. Lived in TX for a brief period back in the early 70s, though, so maybe that counts. 🙂 Funny you should mention making vacuum tubes- I've actually tinkered with that! It's REALLY tough to do, and I've never made one more complicated than a simple diode that barely worked, but I have played around at it. But there's just no infrastructure for vacuum tube fabrication. I can get a lathe and learn how to use it to make complex parts, and while it might take a while to learn- and money to get the equipment, of course- it is possible to do more or less "off the shelf". But vacuum tubes, not so much. There are a few folks out there doing some crazy cool work with bespoke tubes, but they have setups that are far beyond what I can manage in my environment and it's mostly stuff they built by hand. I also have been playing with making piezoelectric Rochelle Salt crystals to replace ancient vacuum tube turntable needles- nobody's made those commercially for probably 60 years. I'm a sucker for learning how to do weird things no one does any more so I can make things no one uses work again. (I think this is drifting off the topic of lathes, lol).
    • You shoulda been born in Texas. Tough to make a vacuum tube though. You can substitute with a MOSFET eq ckt I guess. I was playing around making a pinion the other day. More to it than meets the eye.
    • Well, turns out it was a fake bezel! The crystal is domed mineral glass and I was able to find a cheap replacement that should be here in two days.  I used my crappy little press to pop out the cracked crystal, Ill give the case a good cleaning in the meantime and do a once over on the movement.     
×
×
  • Create New...