Jump to content

Epic Watchmakers Estate Being Ready For Sale...


Recommended Posts

I found this Blog while searching for tools. The link takes you to the blog home page for the latest post, but do scroll to the top and click on the links for Dennis E Harmon Estate and the Repository!

 

Looking at the pictures of his workshop, I imagine this is what heaven looks like!

 

http://mechanicalcurios.com/

 

I believe from reading this blog that most everything is for sale! I will be making a trip up to see this history in Horology in person!

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mentioned the magic name "George Daniels" ,  I find it amazingly clever that people can take apart and then put back together a watch.  To design, make all the parts by hand yourself and then assemble them into a working watch is to me a miracle.

 

Looks like there are lots of interesting things for sale.

 

RogerC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I will be making a trip up to see this history in Horology in person!

 

Don

 

You lucky so and so! :)

 

Out of interest (topic of George Daniels) have you seen Roger Smith's site (George Daniel's protege). He has some vids on YT as well. He has made some beautiful pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You lucky so and so! :)

 

Out of interest (topic of George Daniels) have you seen Roger Smith's site (George Daniel's protege). He has some vids on YT as well. He has made some beautiful pieces.

Oh YES! I follow Roger Smith as well! To me, George Daniels and now Roger Smith is the pinnacle of True Watchmaking! I used to lust after watches like Patek Phillipe's Star-Moon Tourbillon. But to be honest, I feel that these types of watches, though outright amazing feats of technology, do not have the "Soul" of the watches that are now produced by Roger Smith.

 

BTW, if you have not seen the website, there is a fellow who is building tourbillon by following George Daniels Book on Watchmaking The site is listed here:

 

http://watchmaking.weebly.com/

 

Although, after visiting the site, one wonders if this fellow is doing it just to do it, or does this process have some significant meaning...it's hard to get that feel when looking at his site, as wonderful as it is! It's kind of like, "if you have enough money, you can reproduce anything you want!" type of thing!

Don

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - I have seen that site and am most impressed. I have the Watchmaking book which is almost like a watchmaking bible, it's so fascinating.

 

 

 

 It's kind of like, "if you have enough money, you can reproduce anything you want!" type of thing!

 

And "if you have enough time". I'm too busy trying to make a living lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh YES! I follow Roger Smith as well! To me, George Daniels and now Roger Smith is the pinnacle of True Watchmaking! I used to lust after watches like Patek Phillipe's Star-Moon Tourbillon. But to be honest, I feel that these types of watches, though outright amazing feats of technology, do not have the "Soul" of the watches that are now produced by Roger Smith.

BTW, if you have not seen the website, there is a fellow who is building tourbillon by following George Daniels Book on Watchmaking The site is listed here:

http://watchmaking.weebly.com/

Although, after visiting the site, one wonders if this fellow is doing it just to do it, or does this process have some significant meaning...it's hard to get that feel when looking at his site, as wonderful as it is! It's kind of like, "if you have enough money, you can reproduce anything you want!" type of thing!

Don

Don, I too am a fan of Roger Smith and also feel he represents the true soul of watchmaking as the late great George Daniels did, that's not to say I do not love the likes of Patek, I do but the feeling is a different one.

I did not really understand this until getting the Fusee last week. Now looking at it and the way it is finished I can completely understand Rogers and George's ethos.

I am lucky to own a few lovely watches but I have to say none have stirred my soul as much as this Fusee. I think it's in part the integrity of design, part history and part three dimensionality of the movement that allows you to step inside so to speak the watch makers world and travel through how he thinks out and the design and turns it into three dimensional reality. Looking at RWS and GD's watches I see that same ancient way of doing things, not because it is a nod to history but more so that it is simply the right way to go about it.

I would love one day to own a Roger Smith or Daniels watch ( Roger has stated he fully intends past this limited edition of Daniels watches he was working on with the master before he passed to continue the Daniels name in another regular production watch) but in the meantime I am fortunate to get a taste of them with my Fusee!

Edited by ianmedium
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The numbers in the white bar are the average values over the last x seconds. You can set x in the menus. The row of +4s are the s/d of the last four measurement periods. This short history is useful if the traces are wavy. Yours are just too good (dead straight)! The angle of the traces (very slightly up to the right, i.e. rising with time) is a graphical representation of the +4s/d. The vertical separation of the two traces is a graphical representation of the beat error. In your case it's 0.0ms, so the two traces appear to be one.
    • One of the problems with a lot of the videos are they really don't know what they're doing. Typically at the end of the service the put the watch on the timing machine often waiting into the watches fully cased up. As opposed to checking the movement when it's running before it's all cased up. In other words if you're going to have a problem it's nice to bill the work on the dial side without them being there for instance. Then when it is placed on timing machine the only place it in one position they comment how wonderful the numbers look and that really isn't adequate. But typically on those YouTube channels no one notices all the other strange and bizarre things they are doing either.
    • I agree with what the others are saying - I got a set of these when I was starting out and have never managed to use them, and I do a lot of Seikos. The other catch is that a lot of them have a brass arbor, which means that the hook for the spring is too soft and will wear out after a few uses, making them doubly useless. My advice would be to save your money and put it towards a Bergeon generic set - pains me to say it, but it's the only real option, unless you get a used set of generic winders on something like eBay, but this can be a minefield, especially if you aren't 100% sure what you are looking at. I would recommend a half set, if you can afford it, or if you are building up a few at a time, then size 5, 6, 7 will cover a lot of the mens watches. As a side note, if you are doing Swiss and Japanese watches you will need right and left handed versions as the Swiss springs tend to have a right hand wind, and the Japanese tend to have a left handed wind (there are exceptions of course in each case). If in doubt, post a picture on here before you order and people will guide you.
    • Both ends of the Poljot 2612.1 hairspring were "secured" with some kind if crappy glue. They came loose when I was straightening the spring. I placed all parts on the balance cock and used liquid shellac (dissolved in a bit of alcohol) to attach them again. I found using liquid shellac works easier then heating the solid stuff. The job is already fiddly enough without the need for a heatsource as well, but you need to be patient as it takes a few days for the liquid shellac to fully harden.
    • Cuare’s reply covers the Chinese winder set and their capabilities very well.  An alternative to getting calibre specific sets like these is to slowly build a set of quality Swiss winders.  They are sold individually, so you could buy a Bergeon handle and the 2 correct diameter and wind direction winders you need now initially, and buy the other sizes as you need them over time.    If you come across a movement you lack a winder for and feel you won’t likely use that size winder often, then just buy a replacement mainspring, because they come already wound and ready to be pressed into the barrel   You can usually sidestep the need for having both left and right winders in each size by reversing the wind of the spring as follows - wind the spring into a slightly undersized winder, push it out into the correct size winder to suit your mainspring barrel (thereby reversing its direction), and finally press it out into the mainspring barrel.  Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...