Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am new to the hobby and only on my 4th service of a watch.  The first 3 have gone without any issues.

The latest one being a FHF ST96-4 movement. 

I put it on the timegrapher (Weishi 1900) to check it after servicing and to regulate.  All looked good at first then i adjusted the rate and beat error as it was loosing a little.  During this the balance wheel stopped (i did not touch it), so i move the levers back and it started again with a very poor amplitude.   Small adjustment and all started working again.

When it runs now there is no consistency in the rate or amplitude.  can go from -6 to -36 every few seconds.  the amplitude also changes from 284 to 295. The Beat error is 0.0ms.  The change is not dramatic like -6 to -36 in one go but runs steady for about 20 seconds then changes to 0 gain for 4-5 seconds when it resumes the rate goes lower.  Odd is at some times it gains and goes back to -6 as though it was resetting itself.

 

This is the output from the timegrapher.   I am assuming at this point it is an issue with the balance wheel / CAP Jewels???

 

IMG_8732.thumb.jpg.1f63bac6bbc212d93726908c0f2ceafa.jpg

 

 

Below is another one i have done showing normal results after regulating.

IMG_8733.thumb.jpg.2109ba6f4962aac1a72ea72216ab1945.jpg

Posted

Periodic eraticity if correspondes to the period of a gear in the train, either on its own teeth or pinion or both ,imperfect jewel or bent/damage arbour, damage may not be noticable under normal eye loupe magnification. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   Just took it out to inspect under microscope but could not see any damage to pins, spring or impulse pin.

I have a spare movement (not serviced) with a complete balance.  Swapped it out and put back on timegrapher.  All looks ok.  -18s/d, 251 amp and 0.5ms beat error. Nice consistent reading.

 

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope.  

Posted
53 minutes ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope

Often times people with microscopes can see the dust on the pine needles in the forest but can't see the trees.

Then interesting on the timing machine you appear to have two separate lift angles?

Then what happens if you rotate the microphone so the crown is facing down what is that look like On the timing machine?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

So configuration of the coil might have changed as you moved the regulator arm, unlevel, coning so on.

Have you checked coil levelness from side view?

Posted

Thanks everyone for the guidance.  I figured out the issue after watching some of Mark’s tutorials on the Unitas 6489.

He noticed that after servicing a new movement a few times he had the same issue with the balance.   It appears that it was not the balance at all but a few marks where it attaches to the main plate.  Basically screwdriver twists in the mainplate that lifted the balance slightly.

so when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs.  This is why it was erratic. Must have put some further down pressure when I turned the regulator arms.

 

 


 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, SPIGGOTT said:

when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs. 

That is called endshake, very important to be right at least on the balance and escapement.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...