Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

As I mentioned in my introduction, I picked up an old Parker at the flea market with a clean Vajoux 22 movement. There is no resistance (zero, like nothing is engaged) when I turn the crown in the winding position but the hands engage and the watch runs when I wind the crown in the first position. Several people have mentioned these symptoms sound like a broken main spring. This leaves me with a few questions.

1. I know the Valjoux 22 is old and parts are hard to come by and expensive when you find them. Should I move this along for parts and find another project?

2. Is it worth investing the hundreds (maybe a lot more) to fix this? It does not have any sentimental value but I only paid $5 for it. I have talked with someone who specializes in vintage watches about getting an estimate. 

3. Should I keep it in a drawer and come back to it when I may have the skills to get it running on my own. That is likely years in the future. 

I have attached a few pictures so you all can see one of my better flea market finds. The plating on this one looks different from the other Valjoux movements I have seen. Any insight about that would be appreciated. 

movement.jpg

dial.jpg

Posted

I'm a little biased since I'm a sucker for all vintage Valjoux based watches.
The movement in this seems to be complete and in not to bad shape, so to service it and invest in a new mainspring is for me a no brainer. The fact you only spent 5$ up to now makes this a fantastic find.
The pitting in this style of case is quite common but in all I must say it is a quite charming piece.

  • Like 1
Posted

Had the same problem when I first started this hobby.  A friend gave me a battered O&W with a Valjoux 92.  I didn't feel able to tackle it with my very limited knowledge and skills, so I told him to sell it which he did.  I now wish I had kept it, as I feel I could tackle it now, some 6 years on.  I would say, keep it in your drawer for a bit longer as you may get to the stage where you will love to tackle it with confidence. If not, it will probably not lose value as it looks in reasonable condition, and you can move it on.

Posted

A Valjoux 22 is worth some hundreds just as a bare movement. It's an awesome movement, and in chronograph circles once you set aside the big names on the dials it's all about the movement. I imagine a pro service would perhaps equal the value of the watch in this case, but that's the value of it as-found and complete, unserviced.

If you like it keep it and get into it when you have the skill. At any point you can part with it for many times what you paid- but not with a broken minute jumper/pivots etc.

Posted

Thanks for all of your input! I am now leaning towards keeping it unless someone decides they really want it. I can invest whatever I get from this one into better tools and lessons. I am going to have someone look at it to get an estimate just to see what it needs.

18 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I reckon Canthus is right  hang on to it untill you are ready to tackle it . I have attached the tech sheet for you to store with the watch till ready.   cheers

2012_Valjoux 22.pdf 2.37 MB · 2 downloads

Thanks for this! I looked for something similar but didn't have much luck. This is really helpful.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would repeat what @nickelsilver says, and even more. I have at leas 10 old thread plates and I have never seen one that will cut like a normal die. I don't know if they are completely worn or have never been sharp enough, but I find them completely useless. And, for the new Indian ones, I have heard only bad things. For sure, if one tries to cut more thread on a winding stem, this hole of the plate is ruined. Further more, I have bad experience with all watch size thread dies that I could buy from the available machine  tool shops here. They could not cut normal thread even on brass rod. The size was significantly smaller and the pitch is like it should be for the claimed size... The thread shape was bad too. I will explain how I do threads. I use lathe that can cut threads and thus I can prepare perfect taps. I use milling attachment instead cutter in the tool post and so I can cut thread even on hardened rod. But I prefer to harden the rod after thread cutting and temper it only to light color change as to have the maximum hardness. Then I make a tap out of it by grinding. I prepare my dies for screw thread cutting with the taps I have prepared as described. In watchmaking, dies exist and are often used that are not cutting, but rather forming the thread. They are like nuts and don't have cutting holes and edges. This kind of dies I prepare and use. You will need soft steel plate , drill a hole in it, then cut thread, then make chamfer on one side, repeat the thread, harden. You can temper just a little or leave untempered, depending of the steel You use. Using such die is with soft steel rod (or completely annealed). Good oil is to be generously applied. The rod has to be with smaller diam than the thread size (about 0.8 - 0.9 x ), the diam is better determined by tries. The rod elongates by the thread forming too. When I have to make screws from harder material like SS, I just cut them on the lathe. You screw needs hardening and tempering to be finished as real screw.  
    • You could make a guide/jig. Cut a slot in a piece of metal approx the same thickness as the screw head, then drill a hole (screw head diameter) in that slot.
    • Tried a SR920W and its completely dead after 3 weeks 🤷‍♂️ 
    • Thanks so much for quick replies. I got some watch repair tools ordered, and will get back with pictures once I removed the back lid and get into it 🙂
    • Welcome to the WRT forum. 
×
×
  • Create New...