Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Working on a vintage Heuer V72C. Just fully disassembled and all basically OK except the minute recording jumper is fractured :(

I believe it is part #8270.  Anyone have a line on a reasonably priced source for this part??? I suppose I can make one but thats a bit more work than
I was hoping to do on this piece.

Thx,

Stu

Posted (edited)

That part is insanely expensive nowadays, one has to be really carefull working with them especially when polishing the functions.
There are two versions of this movement and both are availible on ebay..

Version 1.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/VALJOUX-23-72-72c-88-PART-8270-MINUTE-RECORDING-JUMPER-SPRING-NOS/264722494307?hash=item3da2b0b363:g:DZUAAOSwF7lcMxT1

Version 2.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/VALJOUX-23-72-72c-88-PART-8270-2nd-Version-MINUTE-RECORDING-JUMPER-SPRING-V7/202640976401?hash=item2f2e57ea11:g:gMAAAOSwzAhdcrYW

Edited by HSL
Posted
4 hours ago, HSL said:

That part is insanely expensive nowadays, one has to be really carefull working with them especially when polishing the functions.
There are two versions of this movement and both are availible on ebay..

Version 1.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/VALJOUX-23-72-72c-88-PART-8270-MINUTE-RECORDING-JUMPER-SPRING-NOS/264722494307?hash=item3da2b0b363:g:DZUAAOSwF7lcMxT1

Version 2.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/VALJOUX-23-72-72c-88-PART-8270-2nd-Version-MINUTE-RECORDING-JUMPER-SPRING-V7/202640976401?hash=item2f2e57ea11:g:gMAAAOSwzAhdcrYW

Thank you - these parts are so very delicate so it's not surprising that after many decades and however many services that they break. The one I have is slightly fractured and a bit of a twist at the fracture as well. I wonder if there's a way to repair it? I fear that an attempt to solder it will just cause it to break from the heat.  This is the exact same watch as Mark's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFOQm9sAzE8&t=932s. He runs into the exact same issue. Mark chose to make a replacement and was kind enough to record the whole process. I am leaning towards doing the same.

In Mark's replacement, I do not believe that he created the alignment pins to the part. I am curious as to whether or not this is a concern as I would not want the jumper to move over time. I was thinking about ensuring the new part was in very close proximity to the balance cock and/or the chrono bridge to prevent rotation.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

They usually are so brittle so if you don't want to buy one I think making one is the best alternative I think, will take an hour or two but is faster than ordering em.
The thing with that minute jumper I guess is that it sometimes will not work correctly, people then tend to bend them to make them "stronger" and they crack, but if one think about it they worked fine as they came from the factory and probably never will lose their springiness.
The trick to get them into shape again and get a snappy  minute tick is to polish the faces of the function ( the part that goes inbetween the gears), this should be mirror polished. Often one can see it is neglected when servicing this beauty. 

27 minutes ago, sstakoff said:

I am curious as to whether or not this is a concern as I would not want the jumper to move over time

On the valjoux 72 version 1 it is fixed into place by two pins and should not move. On the version 2 it can be moved up and down by an excentric wheel.  Both are fixed in place with one screw when in position.

Posted

That's great advice - thank you. What do you use to polish the function? 
On a related note - I would assume it is equally important to obtain a mirror finish on the surfaces of the hammers and the hearts for the chrono wheels. Would you use the same technique??

Regards,

Stu

Posted

I feel that the steady pins are necessary. Especially on jumpers like this that aren't adjustable, once the position is set (you have to adjust the position of the jumper point by filing) then it is set for life. I think he may have left them out to provide a little bit of adjustability, plus it's tricky getting them in the right locations, and you have to make them on a lathe, and press fit, and so on so it's actually a fair bit of work.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

16 minutes ago, sstakoff said:

I would assume it is equally important to obtain a mirror finish on the surfaces of the hammers and the hearts for the chrono wheels. Would you use the same technique??

I do it much like polishing the pallet fork jewels but with different abrasives, first one hold the function of the part with like a bergeon 30433 pallet fork holder, then under the microscope I gently take away the scratches one can see with a 3M 2500 grit stick. When the parts looks good I polish them of with dialux blue spred on a flattened peg wood.
One could probably use a stong lupe too instead of the microscope.

Edited by HSL
Posted

There's a big difference in making a functional part and making one that's right and looks the part too. I think a good minute jumper, that's indistinguishable from factory would take a skilled watchmaker more than an hour or two. If it is steady pinned and unadjustable, and especially if it's beveled, definitely more.

Here's one I did this year for a Longines 30CH. This poor thing had had a jumper from a stopwatch cobbled in, they used one of the steady pin holes for the new screw, so it had been threaded and thus was off location (and the new pins are two different sizes). For this one I used a toolmaker's microscope to locate the steady pin holes and screw hole in relation to where the beak needed to be (hammer down so minute wheel was positioned correctly). Imported an image of an original in cad, scaled it and traced the outline. Cut out the part with cnc, the spring portion oversized, hardened and tempered, thinned the spring down (much easier when heat treated) made and fitted steady pins, fine tuned the beak, polished beak, beveled the foot. That was about a 3 hour job but I'm a prototyper so it's normal work for me, and I have cnc.

I left the steady pins visible (with polished ends) as the locations had been changed and this part likely won't fit another 30CH- a little heads-up to a future watchmaker I hope. 5950e95066ee893b9e2a2431c2cce672.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Imported an image of an original in cad, scaled it and traced the outline. Cut out the part with cnc

That was a good tip, think I will try it out after my vacation, thanx.
Guess it will be some tweaking to get it completely correct.
Valjoux_Minute_Jumper.thumb.jpg.95a6e169a1cca0cc5755c736d210396c.jpg
 

Posted

Really great explanation - and looks like a beautiful job.

HSL - is that CAD a properly dimensioned part? If so, any chance you'd post the .dwg file???

Stu

Posted (edited)

The CAD model still has to be scaled, I just took a picture of a minute valjoux 72 minute jumper and imported it to a rapid CAD tool.
One still have to meassure the part under a microscope with a reticule. I don't have one at home with that feature, and I just began my 5 week vaccation.
If you can meassure the distance between the pins and the hole you could scale it quite easy yourself. Just pop me a pm and you can have the file.

 

Edited by HSL
Posted
4 minutes ago, HSL said:

One still have to meassure the part under a microscope with a reticule.

If you take a good straight picture, and measure the biggest dimension, can't derive all others in software?

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, I'm Marcel (51) from The Netherlands. I recently started my first vintage watch project. Before that I mainly worked on the necessary basic knowledge with the help of videos, forums, such as WatchRepairTalk, and other online information. So today the step to also become active on WRT. I hope to learn a lot from you. Best regards, Marcel
    • Hello and welcome to the forum, the best path to take is to get some medium priced tools , look at Cousins UK . They are a material house and are open to all. There medium priced screwdrivers are middle of the road and wil if looked fore serve you well into the foture I have added a little reading for you to help.  TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf Watch_tools_tipps.pdf
    • After another long hiatus (while waiting for truing calipers to arrive), I’ve made some more progress. TRUING IN THE FLAT I was able to use the calipers I purchased to true the wheel in the flat. There’s still a very slight eccentricity in the round, but I’m going to leave it as is. It doesn’t wobble any more and I’m happy with that. Thanks for the tool recommendation @mbwatch. It worked well, though I must say it takes a delicate touch to get the balance between the calipers. Also, my calipers effectively have four different variations based on the orientation of the arms (2 sides, 2 orientations each). Some are more tapered than others, though to what end, I can’t quite tell. My first thought was that flipping them over yields arms that can be used for poising. They are K&D horizontal calipers, btw. OSCILLATION TEST @nevenbekriev @JohnR725 After truing the wheel in the flat, I carefully remounted the hairspring and did your oscillation test. Balance wheel mounted to balance cock, no pallet fork, rotate balance wheel 180 degrees, let it go, and time+count the oscillations. Results as follows for dial down orientation: Duration: 1m 15sec (to full stop) # of oscillations: About 125, though the amplitude of the oscillations decreased significantly, as one might expect I should redo the test in at least two other orientations…Forgot to do that. 🙂  In general, it’s safe to say this watch has a pretty low amplitude, likely for a variety of reasons. I haven’t oiled the balance jewels FWIW…I should probably do that, but I really don’t want to keep disassembling and reassembling the balance. Is it possible to oil those jewels (top and bottom) by just removing the capstones and putting in a tiny amount of oil, with balance in place? I can see how having the pivot in the jewel hole could change how capillary action works, and thus might pull more oil in than desired. However, those capillary forces will be in effect anyway once the balance is inserted. PRACTICE MOVEMENTS @JohnR725 I agree with your sentiment about using practice movements wholeheartedly, and I’ve done that to some degree. The watch I’m currently repairing is for a friend, and she was willing to have me treat it as a “learn-by-doing experience.” With that said,, I probably should have purchased a few more “beaters” before getting to something where I don’t want to muck things up. I’ve still got a couple of those on the bench that I used as donors, and I’ll try to rehabilitate them.
    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
×
×
  • Create New...