Jump to content

Chrono Second Hand on Zenith Class El Primero Cal 400 Not Resetting Properly


Recommended Posts

Hello,

From what I can find on multiple online forums, I get the impression that fitting a chrono second hand on a mechanical watch is as simple as putting the hand back like the others, but I also read (not movement specific) that there's a special way to do this in order for it to reset correctly.

My issue is with a Zenith Cal 400 in a Class El Primero. I re-lumed the hour and minute hands, and after putting them back, the chrono second hand isn't resetting to the 12 o'clock position. Is there a special process I need to follow to fit the chrono second hand correctly?

Any assistance you can provide will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you ensure you had the pusher down when you set it? If not it's going to reset to the same place which isn't 12.

Also if it's not the same place every time then I would look to see if the hand is now loose. It needs to be a tight fit in order to stay in the same place when reset die to the sheer amount of force a reset produces .



Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't do the pusher part because I didn't have a way to hold the watch securely while setting the hand and pushing the pusher at the same time. Would this be the reset pusher or the start/stop pusher?

As for the tightness, it's still very difficult to remove the hand, although I am not sure if that means it's fit tightly. What's the best way to test this?

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem with chronograph sweep second hands is they have to go on really really tight.. This is because when they returned to zero there is a whole lot of force put on them. So if they are not super tight and they return the zero they tend to wander around..  this means  when pushing at hand on a lot of force is required you have to support the backside  otherwise you'll knock stuff out of alignment on the backside..

Then usually when putting chronograph hands-on if you want them to be in the zero position  as pointed out above you usually have to hold the return to zero button firmly in place  so the heart-shaped cam is locked in place at zero..  otherwise when you push the return to zero depending upon the mechanism a lot of times a return to zero but it will lift off that means we putting the hand on if you turn at all it's free to turn.

the preferred  for putting their hands back on especially the sweep second is a special movement holder specific for this watch. It will support the backside so nothing gets knocked out there and it will have a return to zero button

59 minutes ago, FusionTimer said:

From what I can find on multiple online forums, I get the impression that fitting a chrono second hand on a mechanical watch is as simple as putting the hand back like the others

I like the word simple obviously anyone who told you was simple to put a chronograph sweep second hand on  has never done it before..

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't do the pusher part because I didn't have a way to hold the watch securely while setting the hand and pushing the pusher at the same time. Would this be the reset pusher or the start/stop pusher?
As for the tightness, it's still very difficult to remove the hand, although I am not sure if that means it's fit tightly. What's the best way to test this?
Thank you!
Pushing the reset down will ensure the pinion is in the reset position , not holding it means you can push and move it so it might not be in the correct position when you reset it

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the info!

One other question, maybe I’m thinking too much about this, but I see two ways of holding the reset button:

1. Start and stop Chronograph, then press and hold reset, and fit the hand.

2. Chronograph is already reset, press and hold reset and fit the hand.

Which is the correct way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...