Jump to content

rotor compatibility 2824 to sw200?


Recommended Posts

Is the rotor of a 2824 movement compatible with an sw200? I see gold after market rotors on ebay and other sites for 2824 but my watch runs an sw200. Some says sw200 is a clone of 2824 and parts are interchangeable and some state no. Does anyone know definitively regarding the rotor? Thanx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Winstriumphs said:

I see gold after market rotors on ebay and other sites for 2824 but my watch runs an sw200. 

I think you understand that there is no gold in these, but a plating of similar color?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Winstriumphs said:

I would like to find a real gold one.

Really. I could not weigh it precisely but a standard 2824 weight is approx. 2.5g with the bearing. And I don't know what alloy it is made of, but a density of 9 kg/dm3 shouldn't be far off. Gold is 19.25, so it would need about 4g, at today prices that is about 200 USD. Plus very optimistically the same would go the specialist which makes this as an one-off, there you have an 400 USD upgrade for your Invicta watch. In my opinion there are better way to spend that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

Really. I could not weigh it precisely but a standard 2824 weight is approx. 2.5g with the bearing. And I don't know what alloy it is made of, but a density of 9 kg/dm3 shouldn't be far off. Gold is 19.25, so it would need about 4g, at today prices that is about 200 USD. Plus very optimistically the same would go the specialist which makes this as an one-off, there you have an 400 USD upgrade for your Invicta watch. In my opinion there are better way to spend that money.

My goal originally was to drop one of the gold color rotors for a 2824 into my sw200 Invicta. A modest upgrade. Then later I got the idea to build a Submariner 16610 with upgraded lume to blue Chromalite sapphire case back and real gold rotor. Submariner in red. A prototype with some of the finest submariner features fit together into one watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptCalvin said:

Yeah not very realistic at all. I can guarantee you no solid gold 2824 rotors exist. Also you ain't gettin' any chromalight. Not without some connections in Rolex.

I can obtain bgw9 lume they sell it online. There is notilumnia blue as well both almost identical in quality to Chromalite. The rotor idea was gold plated 18 or 24k. My idea was to buy the 16610 parts mostly original though a few after market maybe could be swapped. I would find a used worn dial and have that refinished to new but with bgw9 lume job and Submariner in red. Gold plate the rotor, wherever they would do that, and add the sapphire caseback. Voila. I have to find affordable parts and a place to plate the rotor. Thoughest part might be luming the pip on the bezel with the blue lume. Dont know if a ceramic insert exists for the watch but aluminum would be fine if it was original. The goal is NOT a fake Rolex but an inspired prototype homage not for sale but personal use. 

Edited by Winstriumphs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are very unlikely to find just bare chronometer movements to buy unless they've been taken out of a watch, and there is a reason why these might be taken out to be sold. Why does the chronometer certification mean so much to you? It's nothing more than a marketing gimmick these days. If it's just for yourself wouldn't it be enough for you to know that your movement is just as accurate as a chronometer rated watch? COSC has what I consider to be rather relaxed requirements for granting the chronometer certification. Most ETA  movements can achieve the COSC standard for chronometers with a little bit of regulation. 

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2020 at 12:05 AM, CaptCalvin said:

You are very unlikely to find just bare chronometer movements to buy unless they've been taken out of a watch, and there is a reason why these might be taken out to be sold. Why does the chronometer certification mean so much to you? It's nothing more than a marketing gimmick these days. If it's just for yourself wouldn't it be enough for you to know that your movement is just as accurate as a chronometer rated watch? COSC has what I consider to be rather relaxed requirements for granting the chronometer certification. Most ETA  movements can achieve the COSC standard for chronometers with a little bit of regulation. 

Where can a watch be sent orther than COSC to obtain a -2 to 2 sec per day standard? Who will test and work on the watch to obtain that standard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A watchmaker makes a movement or accurizes an existing movement, then it's sent to whichever organization to get tested. If it gets past all the tests they stamp their seal of approval on it and it officially becomes a chronometer. Only Rolex observes a -2/+2 standard(superlative chronometer) as far as I'm aware and don't expect them to put the "superlative chronometer" lable an any watch other than their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...