Jump to content

Duofix shock spring


clockboy

Recommended Posts

Here is my tale of woe:

I was asked to look at a very poorly running Rotary watch( 9GS00309/01). It is a skeleton style watch and looking through its clear insert case back I could see the cap jewel was missing. When I opened the case I found the jewel BUT the shock spring had been trapped in the winding stem and is now non reparable. It looks like it was a Duofix which is strange because the dial side s/spring is a KIF trior. I have tried to fit a Trior but they just don't fit (either just too small or just too big)

 

So by any chance have anyone have in their stock a Duofix Shock spring it's size is approx. 2.25mm. This is what they look like.

 

1366154771_ScreenShot2020-01-17at13_13_22.png.1ab185920de5a216956ef90e4b9760ad.png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep I have seen them pics too. I have tried all sizes of Trior ie Kif 1-3, 1-4, 1-5. neither of them fit. The spring that was mangled in the stem was a Duofix. Maybe a previous repairer had fitted the wrong spring hence why it has fallen out. This afternoon I have managed to modify a incabloc spring which fits (just)  and the watch is now on test.  I did try and modify a Trior by putting a curve in it using my staking tool as if you look at the pics the springs are not flat. This did not work either. What fun!!!

 

Just noticed whilst studying the pics is they are not Trior. They are very similar but not Trior. What they are I will have to investigate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really bad as far as vocabulary goes in this area but here goes:

Judging from the incabloc slot it sure looks like a triple/trior or whatever you call it spring should go in there. I remember working on one quite recently and it had the same system. You'd fit in one "foot", rotate slightly and insert the 2nd and then the 3d.

There's quite a couple of variations so maybe they don't use a "traditional" triple spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can try a big tweezer the biggest I had in my set didn’t do the trick but I’ll check if my wife has some none watchmaking ones. 
    • Yes, gum netal, which actually means iron. It is thick enough to be grinded in order to remove the rust pits and then polished, but it will need blackening oxidation in the end for protection from getting rusty. The watch has nothing to do with the railways, it is the same like the 'squirrel' candys - You do not really expect to find a squirrel inside...
    • I think the app is misinterpreted the noise because of the extra case construction    Tom
    • I have just picked up a vintage soviet Zarja watch and I have been inspecting it prior to putting it on the 'to be serviced' pile. When I measured it with the timegrapher app, I found it was gaining loads of time. Taking the case back off, I find it's a tiny movement within a relatively large watch and it has a separate steel cover over the movement which presumably holds it in place against the caseback.   Checking the app again without the cover, I find it is actually running reasonably well for an untouched old watch. Putting the cover and the caseback back in place and it reads as massively gaining time again. This behaviour is consistent every time I take the cover on and off. I have checked the balance cock is fixed and the screw is tight, so I assume that the cover and case back are pinching the movement in some way and making it run fast. Not sure I can see how that works because if the cover is touching the balance, surely it would make it stop not run faster? It can't be touching just the hairspring to make it effectively shorter.  Placing only the cover in place or placing just the caseback in place (not even snapping it shut) both cause the fast running. Pretty sure there are a couple of millimetres clearance between the case back and the movement when the cover isn't there. I have also checked the watch, cover and case back for magnetism with another phone app but none of them seem to have an appreciable magnetic field. Perhaps I need to preemptively demagnetise and get a real compass to check them with.  I appreciate that this is just an app using the built in microphone on my phone - could it be misreading a ringing / reverberation of this cover to give the wrong result? Observing the watch just running on the bench closed up, it does seem to be appreciably gaining time. I will wind it, set the time and leave it running overnight and see how it does with no cover / back in place. Perhaps I will also see how it performs on the wrist to rule out misreading by the app    What am I missing here?
    • OK, sometimes it really happens without problems at all. You can take a covex oilve 120/12 stone from Molnija 3602.
×
×
  • Create New...