Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a soon-to-be 70 year old computer programmer, retiring soon.  Enjoyed my career immensely but I'm done.  The millenials can have it now.  Though I have never even taken the back off a watch before yesterday, I think I am fascinated by the same complexity and order present inside a watch that kept me interested in my programming career all these years.  I have a newly acquired book to learn from (Maintaining and Repairing Mechanical Watches: A Practical Guide, Wiles, Mark W.) and a pocket watch (Chronometre Jupiter) I picked up while on vacation in a little shop in Naples, Italy, to start working on.  Between these and the folks on this forum I hope to learn what makes this baby tick and how to improve the accuracy of the time it keeps (right now it gains a couple hours a day).

Posted

Welcome here. Not really surprising but IT specialist, retired or having enough time anyway make a big or possibly the majority of members here.

Posted

Welcome Loren

I am an electronics engineer and soon to retire. In the same way you describe I too find mechanical watch and clock movements fascinating so I decided to study and learn the art of service and repair.

Recently I watched a YOUTUBE video with the eminent George Daniels presiding over a meeting of the AWCI (American Watch and Clock makers Institute), where George explains in detail the creation of his co-axial escapement. Well worth a watch. He has a pleasing manner with humorous overtones. My favorite quote is where he describes the job in life of the battery of a quartz watch movement is to commit suicide at the first opportunity. You can clearly tell he is not a fan of quartz movements. Hope you enjoy the video.

Here is the link to the video. His voice is gruff, I think he may have had a sore throat.

 

 

  1.    
     
  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you for the reply, Colditz.  I appreciate the link.  I actually watched a very interesting biography of his life, and the training of his apprentice, on TV last night.  Fascinating genius.  Maybe not the nicest person (arrogant, abrasive).  But clearly the grand master of watchmakers.  Imagine making those beautiful watches... EVERY single piece... with your own two hands.  Unbelievable. 

Posted

Indeed.  That's the one.  They were an unlikely pair, I must say.  For both of them I admire the fact that it's not just about keeping time, but keeping time with elegance.  Having said that, I knew their watches would be expensive  but had no idea just how expensive.  Yikes!  :-)

Posted

I guess its the rarity value also. Roger doesn't make many watches 10 a year I think between him and his apprentice.

Still rather have a RS watch than a Rolex any day irrespective of price. I would like to know why Roger picked the Isle of Mann to manufacture his watches and not London.

Posted

Welcome...as a once upon a time electronics  tech whose  first computer  used mylar/ aluminum  punch tape,and whose "logic" was  clicking relays...welcome. 

Posted
On 12/12/2019 at 1:24 PM, Loren said:

Thank you for the reply, Colditz.  I appreciate the link.  I actually watched a very interesting biography of his life, and the training of his apprentice, on TV last night.  Fascinating genius.  Maybe not the nicest person (arrogant, abrasive).  But clearly the grand master of watchmakers.  Imagine making those beautiful watches... EVERY single piece... with your own two hands.  Unbelievable. 

He was also a racing driver

Posted
On 12/15/2019 at 11:25 AM, yankeedog said:

Welcome...as a once upon a time electronics  tech whose  first computer  used mylar/ aluminum  punch tape,and whose "logic" was  clicking relays...welcome. 

Mine, a Prime computer at the community college I attended, all done with punch cards.  A lot of work just to get the sum of all prime numbers between 1 and 100.  :-)

Posted
On 12/12/2019 at 10:20 AM, Colditz said:

Do you have a watch collection? If so what have you got?

Just got myself a half hunter Fusee to restore. It ticks but not for long.

 

 

I'm new to this, so my "collection" is small.  First the silver "Chronometre Jupiter" pocket watch I picked up while on vacation in Rome last month and about which I can find almost no information.  This is currently disassembled and cleaned but waiting on additional tools and supplies to be oiled and reassembled.  I have now officially spent more on tools than I did on the watch.  Apparently a well known occupational hazard for watch enthusiasts.  I have a circa 1960 Benrus wristwatch I acquired for its sentimental value.  One nearly identical was my first, gifted to me by a beloved Uncle, when I was maybe 10-11 years old.  Lastly (for now at least), another wristwatch having a Swiss hand-winding movement, identified as by Fontainemelon, which is reportedly working well. The movement is protected by an inner hinged cover which has an inscription, 'To Dick from Cecil, Xmas 1923'.  Coming to me from the Worcestershire area of the UK.  I can't help wondering who Dick and Cecil were that they made it through The Great War alive.  Possibly too young or too old to fight.  Hopefully a larger collection in the future but for now I'm enjoying my new hobby.

Posted

My my, you will spend a small fortune on kit. I am always looking in antique shops for the odd tool that pops up now and again. In some cases they do not know what they have and you can pick up a bargain. The thing is 'patience'. I would love to get my hands on a Platax tool in good working condition at a reasonable price. Anybody got one?

The Fontainemelon is a lovely time piece - enjoy.

Posted
6 hours ago, Loren said:

Mine, a Prime computer at the community college I attended, all done with punch cards.  A lot of work just to get the sum of all prime numbers between 1 and 100.  :-)

My most effective  "alignment " tool was a rawhide  mallet. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • I agree with hector it's probably the regulator curve, it almost always is on these movements. So i work on these movements a lot and iv'e managed to fairly consistently get them running at like 50 degrees more amplitude than that with deltas in the 3 range and on the wrist deviations of sub 1 second a day. They ALWAYS require work to get there though. The main thing is shaping the regulator curve and this is really finnicky and definitely something you practice on a movement you don't care about when you're new (I'm still new) but if the hairspring is flat and the coils are evenly spaced and the regulator curve is properly shaped and it's pretty wild how accurate these movements can get.  But, it does sound like your regulator curve maybe needs a bit of reshaping. You can easily mess up the watch learning to do this so warning if you don't want to live with your current results but I"m not an expert, it's just speculation but there's a pretty easy way to check.  This is a good video showing how to see if your terminal curve is properly shaped. Just make sure the regulator pins are open when you test this.   He takes off the balance wheel to shape it. I do it with the movement disassembled but the balance on the mainplate. I use a homemade tool from a sharpened dental pic to do the adjustments (Tiny tiny TINY adjustments) and i use the regulator pins themselves to sorta brace the spring against to bend it very tiny amounts and just keep checking it by moving the regulator arm down it till it stops moving the hairspring. Taking off the balance wheel over and over again is a good way to slip and destroy your hairspring and will make the process way slower. I try to avoid removing the balance wheel from the cock it on these movements due to how difficult it is to get the hairspring stud back into the balance cock. It's super easy to slip and twist your spring then you got way worse problems.  Since these are mass manufactured and unadjusted the regulator curve is NEVER perfect but once you learn how to reshape them it's pretty easy to do and you can get REALLY low deltas with really low positional error and pretty remarkable accuracy.  Definitely with it powered down and the balance on the movement with both balance jewels in place look across the spring to see if it's perfectly flat, then check the regulator curve how he does it in the video. I would bet money even if it's not your main issue the regulator curve is not ideal also. 
    • Thanks. Damn, first breakage. This picture of the movement is from the sale listing.  
    • Hello all, New member here, hoping  to gain knowledge about something that has been of interest for years.  Cheers!
    • So the stem is snapped and will need replacing but luckily there's enough left in the crown to unscrew without a problem. Will need to see photos of the movement to identify it.
×
×
  • Create New...