Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all

 

I'm new to this forum and joined to further my watch restoration knowledge but I was recently asked to restore this clock so I thought I’d share it with you. 

 

75FB2502-BA19-4CAF-9C8E-475BEDF75A52.thumb.jpeg.20c0d02e924300e800ded621e62df6a9.jpeg

 

The clock was bought in New York by a friend of mine many years ago but as it ran on 110v  it never told the right time in the UK!! The neon ring, which I’m pretty sure was fitted at a later date, was also quite faint. 

 

I started by stripping the clock down and removing the hands, face and movement as well as the neon and transformer. I found a new mains movement from cousins with euroshaft fittings and soon discovered that unfortunately there was no way I would be able to salvage the original hands. I have a friend who has a cnc machine so I had him cut me a new set out of 1mm brass. 

 

I took the neon tube to a local specialist who tested it for me. The original transformer was a death trap on 240v apparently but fortunately the tube was in good shape and much brighter on a modern transformer.

 

I guess the purists out there might have tried to make the original movement work but for me I was really happy to bring this clock back to proper working order. 

Posted

Hi Well done changing the mech is no big deal some of these units disintergrate inside to a point where changing the mech is the only way. At least the clock is uptodate and safe to operate in the UK.:thumbsu:

Posted

Nice! I think the issue was 60hz rather than 50hz, so even with the voltage stepped down it wouldn't work right without a more sophisticated electrical adaptation, or- changing the movement. It's awesome the neon is functional, that's a nice looking piece.

Posted

Thanks guys. I’m no expert but the movement didn’t look very special anyway. And yes, the original neon definitely makes it special. The modern neons just don’t have the same feel. 

Posted

Nice work. When replacing hands on clocks, you need to have the weight of the  replacements as near to the original,  it can cause the movement to run erratically.  

Posted
55 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Nice work. When replacing hands on clocks, you need to have the weight of the  replacements as near to the original,  it can cause the movement to run erratically.  

Thanks. Yes if I'd have wanted to keep the original movement I would have probably tried to salvage the hands or if I had to remake them I would have made sure the hands were the same weight. As I chose a heavy duty mains movement as a replacement that can handle huge hands I was pretty confident it would be fine.

Posted

I like the look of some mains powered clocks, but the old mains powered movements are usually death traps, replacing the movement was probably the best idea.

I did once read how to convert Smiths mains clocks to run on 12 V AC but being your clocks came from the USA the frequency difference would still stop it from working.

Nicely done.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...