Jump to content

How to measure balance end shake?


AP1875

Recommended Posts

 

Though Rolex expectedly provides instruction for every aspect, yet in general and according to the diagram, slackening you back off 90 to 135 degrees.

Tighten to a point, where the slightest slackening releases the balance wheel.

I am sure  specific advice will come as members finish breakfast.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the approach I explained above ( poorly ofcourss) is widely practiced.

1- I tighten the screw unitl both endstones come to contact with the staff pivots.

Just about the point the balance wheel resists moving freely.

2- Slacken the screw back, about 90 and 135 degrees, that corresponds to between 2 to 3 hundereth of a mm of endstones displacement ( further apart).

Lucky Rolex offers this design, you got to shim, gauge ...on popular designs.

I see no need for measuring tools. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, AP1875 said:

Reading through a service sheet for the Rolex Daytona and the movement has a 'regulation nut' under the balance bridge. You can adjust this to get the correct endshake. How is this measured? Is a special tool used?

Looks like it's possible to do that on the timegrapher. Amplitude decrease = too little endshake. Large position variance or other irregularities = too much. The range is 1 cent. of mm and not directly  or easily measurable. 

Edited by jdm
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2019 at 3:30 PM, Nucejoe said:

I guess the approach I explained above ( poorly ofcourss) is widely practiced.

1- I tighten the screw unitl both endstones come to contact with the staff pivots.

Just about the point the balance wheel resists moving freely.

2- Slacken the screw back, about 90 and 135 degrees, that corresponds to between 2 to 3 hundereth of a mm of endstones displacement ( further apart).

Lucky Rolex offers this design, you got to shim, gauge ...on popular designs.

I see no need for measuring tools. 

 

 

 

Thank you for explaining your method seems very logical (if I have understood correctly) and no need for tools. Also, I realised if a tool was required Rolex would've made one and referenced it here as they do elsewhere. 

So tighten the screw so there is barely any endshake (which might mean the balance not moving) then slacken off and check on the tinegrapher as JDM suggests for optimal position. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AP1875 said:

Thank you for explaining your method seems very logical (if I have understood correctly) and no need for tools. Also, I realised if a tool was required Rolex would've made one and referenced it here as they do elsewhere. 

So tighten the screw so there is barely any endshake (which might mean the balance not moving) then slacken off and check on the tinegrapher as JDM suggests for optimal position.

Perfect. You said it better than I.    Good luck 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also see a bit of danger for the wheel, at least you have to keep away from it and may get a too thick rest ring. My rest rings are about 0.05 mm. Better way would be a grinding wheel touching the staff with its circumference. Frank
    • Not easy to find this one everywhere,  so it depends where you are located. Joining it back together might be possible, i have silver soldered mild steel before even with traditional plumbers lead and its a pretty strong joint, but bere in mind this is only 1mm diameter.  The join would need to be very accurate,  it not something i have heard of anyone trying before. The part no 401 is the swiss code number and relates to watch winding stems in general
    • Thanks everyone for your helpful replies. I think between us we’ve worked out what’s going on. Next job is to have a proper look at this great wheel assembly, see if I can remove the clip and the friction fit pinion, give the bits a good clean, then put it back together with a bit of blue grease. I’ll also get the pallet fork under the microscope to see if it’s ok or been damaged. 
    • The cannon pinion (be it conventional style or what you see in this movement) should slip on its arbour so the hands can be set independently without affecting the gear train.  If there is too much friction between the cannon pinion and the second wheel, turning the hands to set them backwards can sometimes force the escape wheel teeth to overrun the pallet stones, creating the behaviour you describe. The train is running in reverse when this happens.  This can often chip the pallet stones. I’d say at least half of the watches I’ve inspected with very tight cannon pinions had chipped pallet stones. Hopefully this isn’t the case with your watch.  I’m not familiar with this movement but you need to get the friction in the cannon pinion adjusted correctly.  Hope this helps, Mark
    • Pallet fork was in. I’d had the movement running ok, and only removed the balance to flip it over and install the keyless works and date mechanism. The pallet fork wasn’t locking the gear train when hand setting - it was oscillating as the escape wheel rotated. This may have been in one direction only - can’t remember. 
×
×
  • Create New...