Jump to content

Help Identifying Model Of Bulova


Billiards

Recommended Posts

Nope. it's not a Beau Brummell. Even though they have very similar dials.

 

There are a couple of noticeable differences:

1) The case design is slightly different.

    a) No visible lugs on the Beau Brummell.

    b ) Beau Brummell uses a standard rectangular domed crystal. Mine is rectangular with a wave in it (case profile matches the wavy crystal).

2) The Beau Brummell uses a 8AC movement. Mine uses the 7AP.

Edited by Billiards
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Billiards,

 

Wow really? It is  mystery then. The three ruby and diamond dial are usually reserved for Beau Brummell and Bulova itself have been inconsistent in something as straightforward as the spelling of the name which points to  difficulty in ID-ing this model in particular. Do you know anything about who owned the watch before you?  The case design is Art Deco, but the 7AP movement and the year, put it earlier than Beau Brummell. This movement can be found in a bunch of Bulovas including the Curvex, President, Minuteman, and the like. Keep in mind that the B.B.. came in many flavors: hidden lugs, exposed lugs, Round case, square case, stainless steel, rolled-gold, etc. The one thing that is common to all is the dial with stones--either diamond/ 3-rubies or all diamonds.

JC 

Edited by noirrac1j
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The date symbol on the movement puts this one at 1937. 

 

I don't know anything more about it. The previous owner didn't have any additional information. I don't think they made the Beau Brummell in 1937. I could be wrong though.

 

Still, I really wish I knew more about it. I've got it up for sale for $225.00. Someone will see it and appreciate it enough to make it their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...