Jump to content

My opinion on automatic cleaning machines

jdm

By jdm
in Tools & Equipment

 Share

Recommended Posts

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted

I fail to understant what an auto machine does better than manual or U/S cleaning. All what it does is heating the fluid and doing a little of shaking, plus of course chaning jars for you, oh the solace.. No doubt looks impressive to show off.

 

oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

When I was, a watchmaker, I would clean many at once in an auto machine. Never need to watch and move the thing from one jar to another. It gave very good results. It left me time to get on with other things like cleaning the cases or fitting a new glass. Or if I felt like it a walk round town, come back in say 20 minutes and its waiting for you. After having an automatic, you will not want to go back to a manual one.

clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted

Agree with oldhippy. I miss my L&R varimatic a lot, cleaning was an absolute breeze.  It is broken & I will have to fix it myself (when time).  I now use a Indian made cleaner (Janter Pearl)  which surprisingly gives great results. But it is manual and is just not solidly built. The cleaner oldhippy has found is a lovely machine but I have not got a limitless budget. 

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

When I was, a watchmaker, I would clean many at once in an auto machine. Never need to watch and move the thing from one jar to another.

Now when you look at the audience of this forum 70% are hobbyists than never work on more than a watch at the time, and never rush things. For them, the money and space taken by an auto machine is better spent elsewhere. Add that these old device have an habit of breaking easily (as the many threads here demonstrate) and there is only one guy in the UK that will will wok repair them, and you have another potential headache saved.

clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jdm said:

Now when you look at the audience of this forum 70% are hobbyists than never work on more than a watch at the time, and never rush things. For them, the money and space taken by an auto machine is better spent elsewhere. Add that these old device have an habit of breaking easily (as the many threads here demonstrate) and there is only one guy in the UK that will will wok repair them, and you have another potential headache saved.

I agree. However I do find the ultrasonic cleaning method time consuming and inefficient. The parts seem cleaner and are dry when the machine has finished when using a pro machine without any fuss. It is down to budget and space.

  • Like 1
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, clockboy said:

The parts seem cleaner and are dry when the machine has finished when using a pro machine without any fuss.

Cleaner than from an ultrasonic machine having been just shaken a little? Sorry, that is hard to believe.

And since oldhippy likes to share Ebay links for these machines I have merged these threads to keep the discussion in a single place.

  • Like 1
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, clockboy said:

The L&R varimatic not only washes the parts it also ultrasonic cleans as well. The parts come out clean and sparkly with a breeze.

I have looked at the L&R website and looks like they have dropped the automatic jar changing and are producing only U/S machines. http://www.lrultrasonics.com/industries/jewelry/

Maybe the professionals have found having to change solutions manually is not that a big issue after all.

clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted

I was told by the guy who re- furbed the L&R that the vintage machines Ultrsonically cleaned in all three jars but the new L&R’s only ultrasonic in the first jar. Changing the fluid was not an issue as it lasts for approx 30 watches.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tonydagee
      Calendar work certina 25-651

      By tonydagee · Posted

      Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • tIB
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By tIB · Posted

      Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • Malocchio
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By Malocchio · Posted

      I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • nickelsilver
      A lathe with indexing that won't break the bank?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • SidKop
      Opinions on Seiko's 4R and 6R movement quality from those more able to judge

      By SidKop · Posted

      I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...