Jump to content

Now That I Have A Staking Tool...


Recommended Posts

I have a question for you guys,

 

Given that vintage watches are kind of more sensitive to impact than incabloc et al protected "modern" ones, Is there a way to remove the original jewels on the balance wheel and substitute it for an incabloc sort of setting?

 

I'm thinking about those beautiful Hamiltons, etc....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple answer; yes...............

But,

Full answer; there is no reason why you  shouldn't  push out the original jewels and replace with incabloc settings. This will almost certainly require the plate and cock to be machined to receive the incabloc settings which may be possible with your staking set if you have reamers that fit, otherwise a lathe would do the trick.

However, you will not be able to use the original balance once you've switched out the jewels. The pivots for Incabloc settings are a different shape to the non shock settings so you will need to source an appropriate balance, or balance staff (and then obviously change that for the original and re-poise), or if there isn't one available, make an appropriate new staff.

So yes it can be done but there's a lot more to it than just pushing out the old and pushing in the new.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see, then it would be out of the question to go to all that trouble unless there is a really good reason to do it...or maybe as a learning experience when I'm at the right level to try it.

 

By the way, is there a link for this Daniels job?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a quote for you Bob

"To try and rectify the situation, he suggests they attempt to put the escapement into a wristwatch. The chief liked the idea and produced a 2.5 mm thick movement for the escapement to be fitted to. Daniels had previously, on his own whim, put the co-axial into an Omega Speedmaster, but was not sure he could do so to such a thin watch. He was sure the chief held the same opinion and "I [Daniels] realised that I had been outwitted." If he couldn't fit it to a modern watch than there was no point in progressing this work. He went back to London to solve the problem."

And here's a link to something that will intrigue you:-

http://chronomaddox.com/daniels_co-ax.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well it's arrived, and it's a pleasant surprise. A 11.5''' 21 jewel FHF 72. It's running (just) and looks in great condition.  It needs a good service, and new crown and strap.  It's a front loader but doesn't have a split stem. There's a small lever (visible when you remover the bezel), which when moved, frees the stem and the movement from the case (a new one on me).  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hi All, I'm Geoff and I've been working on/with watches and clocks since I was thirteen. My dad was a watchmaker and while he did not want me in the field as a profession, I've always maintained a pretty good working knowledge. In the '70's I kinda got pulled back into things because Quartz revolution began and he only had limited electronic knowledge. So we combined skills. He the watchmaker and me the electronics tech. Being here in NY helped because we got to know the folks from Bulova, Seiko, Citizen, and WOSIC. H.B. Freid was my Dad's teacher and I was fortunate enough to get to know him too. I still maintain a bench here at home and occasionally work on watches for friends although the hands aren't what they used to be. Not going to be working on any FHF59 or AS1012's any time soon. Oddly enough though my years working with the field taught me how to work on almost anything else mechanical and mostly electronic. Since I was the one in the family who maintained Dad's cleaning and timing machines. those experiences carried over quite nicely into the worlds of recording and audio as well as others. I look forward to the discussions and maybe still learning a trick or two. Cheers to all and nice to be here.  
    • The best and almost only way to achieve the magical £ 4.04 individual watch cost is via the loophole ploy of job lot buys Ross. Dividing down the outlay by the number of watches purchased. I've managed it many times in the past, this then gives you the extra edge of choosing any watch from that lot. Maybe we should have an all time winner, whos prepared to troll  through the last four years of posts and pick some worthy contenders. Unfortunately i have a poorly shoulder so i cant raise my right hand and my left shoulder is out in sympathy for my right shoulder. Put your right hand up if you think i talk a load of bull 💩     🖐 Tom's comment is purely restricted to  the Bergeon culture of " lets rip off everyone on the planet " Voted , i thought to keep it in pounds as originally designed and out of respect for Andy . Personally i would have kept the £4.04 as I'm very traditionalist and dont like change but i know how hard you overseas guys are finding it and i believe in fair play. I expect to be posting the occasional Omega or Longines but then you brought this on yourself so dont get jealous Scott 😆
    • Ah but, will you count DIY versions.
×
×
  • Create New...