Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've just purchased my first lathe. It's a Boley with a D-bed and loads of accessories. It's one of the accessories I have a question about.

The previous owner had completely unwound the lower slide from its internal anchor nut. It's the nut for the adjuster for the lower bed.

It was easy enough to take it apart and reassemble it, but the thread in the nut needs to be re-tapped because the adjuster spindle is too tight.

Does anyone know the tap size for the thread?

It's a left hand wound thread and 4mm diameter.

Boley cross slide thread

Thanks everyone.

Posted (edited)

you've got the 4mm part, now you need to know pitch.   As OH suggests use a thread pitch gauge....or set your caliper for say 20 mm, set one  leg at crest and count the thread crest to the next leg...divide that by 20 and you have your pitch

Its going to correspond the the markings on the graduated collar , so double check against that, that it makes sense.  i.e. if the collar have 50 divisions, and each means an advancement of .01 mm, the thread pitch should be .5.  You can get to the pitch directly that way, just that the collars aren't always clearly marked.

Having said all, I really question re tapping without a lot of careful consideration.  What could have cause this?  Is it tight only when assembled, or will nut not smoothly run on the feed screw when apart?  If it goes on apart but not assembled, its likely an alignment issue.  If won't go on in either case, its likely a damaged male thread.  Internal threads wear and get more loose, not tighter....unless its something catastrophic.  External threads otoh are easily subject to dings and bruises.  If the external is damaged, the last thing you want to do is run it through the nut else you risk damaging the nut....a feed screw is a fine precision element of a machine tool and they must treated with care.

i would start by carefully examining the male thread with a loupe for any imperfections.  With a very fine watch makers file, remove them or if there is a lot of damage, get a die and chase it.  Get a quality adjustable die and do it very carefully - too much and instead of chasing it you remove to much and change the pitch diameter and greatly increase backlash....do any or all of this with the utmost of care

Edited by measuretwice
Posted

As has been said, grab a pitch gauge and check with that, I had to re it a thread on a pendulum after I had to repair it, then re cut the bob,  result nice new threads that I had chased and when clock ran the bob would make its way down the pendulum, took a couple of days to notice what was causing the time to go awry, solved it by making a tiny nut that sits under the bob acting like a lock nut. So to sum up take care when re threading etc, just incase.

Posted
5 hours ago, measuretwice said:

you've got the 4mm part, now you need to know pitch.   As OH suggests use a thread pitch gauge....or set your caliper for say 20 mm, set one  leg at crest and count the thread crest to the next leg...divide that by 20 and you have your pitch

Its going to correspond the the markings on the graduated collar , so double check against that, that it makes sense.  i.e. if the collar have 50 divisions, and each means an advancement of .01 mm, the thread pitch should be .5.  You can get to the pitch directly that way, just that the collars aren't always clearly marked.

Having said all, I really question re tapping without a lot of careful consideration.  What could have cause this?  Is it tight only when assembled, or will nut not smoothly run on the feed screw when apart?  If it goes on apart but not assembled, its likely an alignment issue.  If won't go on in either case, its likely a damaged male thread.  Internal threads wear and get more loose, not tighter....unless its something catastrophic.  External threads otoh are easily subject to dings and bruises.  If the external is damaged, the last thing you want to do is run it through the nut else you risk damaging the nut....a feed screw is a fine precision element of a machine tool and they must treated with care.

i would start by carefully examining the male thread with a loupe for any imperfections.  With a very fine watch makers file, remove them or if there is a lot of damage, get a die and chase it.  Get a quality adjustable die and do it very carefully - too much and instead of chasing it you remove to much and change the pitch diameter and greatly increase backlash....do any or all of this with the utmost of care

Thanks for all the input guys.

The adjuster thread is good. The nut though was slightly damaged so needs to be re-tapped because it's too tight.

Knowing the type of thread would be good prior to working out the pitch. Does anyone know if Boley used the metric system?

I've feeling I'll need to arm myself with  several gauges of different types.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, systeman said:

Knowing the type of thread would be good prior to working out the pitch. Does anyone know if Boley used the metric system?

I've feeling I'll need to arm myself with  several gauges of different types.

They're German so the answer is yes...whether they ever used an imperial thread is doubtful but its also impossible to say that it never happened.  Dollars to to donuts its metric.

do you have a caliper?  even a good rule.  Start as I described by counting crest over a known distance and compare that to the graduated dial, there should be an obvious match

Edited by measuretwice

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...