Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got this Omega from the sales corner on Rlt being sold for repair ,the spring was slipping and the second hand was missing , crystal cracked and a bit grubby.
So stripped it ,cleaned dial with a good old drop of saliva , fitted new mainspring as the tail end had broken off causing it to slip , cleaned and lubed movement , a 268 17 jewel manual dating at 1960 , found a new second hand from a donor watch fitted new crystal and here she is.
It's never going to be a safe queen as the plating is a bit shabby and the dial isn't perfect by any means but it's a wearable vintage piece hopefully.

Been running now for almost 24hrs and is keeping good time , which is always a bonus

 

DSC_7484_zps0c265e91.jpg

 

DSC_7485_zpscac395a0.jpg

 

DSC_7486_zpscddddc65.jpg

 

 

DSC_7495_zps6fd6df0d.jpg


 

Posted

It's 1964 - Cal. 601. You can't tell from the photo, but there's quite a bit of plate loss from the upper part of the bezel. It hardly shows, but I may yet swap it for a similar one with a better condition case.

 

Or just buy another, of course... :crazysmile:

Posted (edited)

Sounds like a plan Will just buy another lol.

I have a steel seamaster with a 601 movement from 1967 it was one of the first i got

SDC103461.jpg

DSC_0257.jpg

Edited by Andyclient
Posted

Thought you could only use spit and polish with boots but that is quite an appreciable difference on the dial.

Wiki says saliva is 99.5% water, while the other 0.5% consists of electrolytes, mucus, glycoproteins, enzymes, and antibacterial compounds such as secretory IgA and lysozyme.

Wonder if the water did the job or the special mix in the other .5% either way it worked. Outstanding job.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
    • The sping is not pushing directly on the cap, but is pushing against the spindle. So, even if the usual black cap is replaced with the micrometer cap, the spindle is still pushed up.
    • But he tells that the micrometer cap doesn't screw into the spindle. How can the spring push the spindle up if there's nothing to grip? There is a screw visible on top of the micrometer cap so should it be able to screw into the spindle? I'm feeling really dumb now. Does anyone manufacture that cap as an aftermarket item? Might be worth investing. Ok so the spindle is different, now I get it.
    • I suppose? If it worked before and it doesn't work now I guess the question would be why does it not work now? That would come back to if you did not have the chronograph module on will it work or is the chronograph module sucking too much power out of the watch basically 99 usually when they go bad you can hold on the tube part and usually just spin the wheel because it has zero holding at all so usually when they go bad they go bad very bad. You should build hotel when you set the watch as to whether it seems to have any friction or not. I'm just wondering if the chronograph module is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...