Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A recent question from Geo on whether I would get the dial refurbished on  a recently-bought Longines prompted some musing on my part about the vexed question of restoration - particularly of dials. It's a question I've never resolved in my own mind, so have usually tended to let things lie.

 

Coincidentally, I asked the D.R. Bill dial restoration people to give me a quote on a Luxor chrono dial which is tatty and has been "nibbled on part of the edge (I've included a pic below). He gave me a reasonable quote and said that he could do it "as long as I have the sizes in stock" - which implies that, rather than working to restore the original dial, there'll be a lookalike replacement. Roberto Facchini in Norwich gave a me a similar quote, but I got the impression that it was more of a restoration job. Difficult...

 

My problem is that, for me, a watch is a piece of history, and a 50-year old watch has 50 years of being used, lived with, etc. And I worry that, having had work done, I'll always regret the lack of the original. If a dial was really, really in a mess - which means that I would probably have bought the watch for the movement - then the decision would be easier!

 

post-64-0-12371100-1411208688_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Posted

Just my view but I would like to see a quality watch restored,  there is something satisfying about bringing a much abused and knocked about watch back to almost as new condition for future generations to enjoy. 

Posted

Is there a way just to clean and relume the dial, markers and/or hands? That would be a good compromise. As a comparison, it would be like me after a shave! :)  (not removing the "age" but cleaner looking!)

Posted

Hi,

   Just to throw my two cents in here I think of a vintage watch much like a vintage car. They might be original with the paint all faded and having a rust hole or two in the fenders but look how much better they look after a good restoration. Of course the restoration will also prevent further damage. A friend once had a MG A I think it was. In the passenger seat you could look through the floor and see the asphalt going by. To get out you had to share the one door handle. It was much safer after restoration and looked a lot better as well. It's ok to restore paintings to the point of replacing holes in canvas.

   On watches we replace the crystal, polish the cases and change the bands without batting an eye. For me I want the dial looking nice as well. This is just my opinion and I wouldn't try to influence anyone to change their mind. Now the way I did the dial on my Omega is I bought another movement with a very bad dial that was like mine. Send that dial off to be refinished and kept the original dial on the watch until I got the refinished one back.  

Charles

  • Like 2
Posted

Depends on each individual watch of course but in many cases restoring the dial has the effect of 'conserving' the rest of the watch, because it becomes valued and treasured again instead of being consigned to the scrap heap or spare parts bin.

Posted (edited)

Personally, given a choice between a restored Luxor dial and the one pictured, I'd pay a lot more for the one pictured. It really depends on the end goal, does it not? Some people like seeing a watch's age, others want it to look almost brand new. If I had to, I might try to get the "nibbling" at the 5 o'clock mark repaired as much as possible but hi-res pictures usually amplify how aging detracts from appearance so it's hard for me to judge.

Of course, there's also times when "patina" is just "dirt" ;). So a cleanup, as opposed to a full restoration, is often acceptable if the dial CAN be cleaned and it's obviously far gone. And there's those times when restoration does actually preserve the rest of the watch and should precedence, like old crystals whose emissions in time can rust the movement and/or dial.

I can see why the choice is hard though, I love that dial design and if there no nibbling, I wouldn't even consider touching it.

Here's an example of another reason why I'd hesitate getting a dial restored. At the very end is a comparison between the original dial and a restoration. The two have substantial differences. To me, this would count as a terrible dial restoration...

Edited by PadraicB
  • Like 2
Posted

I can see what you mean, Padriac - the "restored"/new dial has lost the character of the original watch. It could just be a different watch.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the esscape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
×
×
  • Create New...