Jump to content

Mainspring stronger than spec. Bad for jewels, etc.?


Recommended Posts

Greetings, all.

I recently bought another pocket watch. Not that I needed another pocket watch, but we know how that goes, right? As I inspected it prior to tearing it down, I noticed that the lower center-wheel jewel was cracked. It looked like the watch would still run as it was, and the back of the arbor didn't look damaged, so with oil I figured it will be OK. I then found a broken upper balance hole-jewel. When I let down the mainspring, it seemed to have an inordinate amount of resistance. Measuring it, I found that it was a bit too strong. It was a Dennison 4 when specification is for a 5. This amounts to about .02mm in thickness. Other jewels looked OK on this 19J watch, but the two damaged got me thinking, especially the lower center jewel. Does using a significantly stronger mainspring make it more likely to damage jewels? Granted, the center jewel was probably damaged by not supporting the lower arbor when replacing the canon-pinion, and the upper balance hole jewel would have been from some other trauma, I was just wondering about whether an overly strong mainspring would put enough added stress on the jewels to actually damage them. Thoughts?

Unfortunately, the watch shows other signs that work which was carried out with less-than-finesse in the past. I guess this one won't be a quick complete fix, and  may stay on the "ticking wounded" list for a while. :unsure: At least the size of the watch makes the easy stuff easier. Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that a stronger spring can do damage besides speed up wear. A lot of the old pocket watches were repaired using springs that just "fit", either because of expediency or lack of knowledge. I agree with your assessment that the lower center jewel was probably damaged when the cannon pinion was pressed on, I've seen a few on watches with no other evidence of foul play so it's about the only explanation. It pains me sometimes to see the shoddy work that has been done to some of these otherwise fine pieces.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainspring strengths are interesting specification. If your pocket watch is old which I assume it originally probably came with a blue steel spring. The original blue steel Springs are always weaker than the modern white Springs. So for the same thickness the modern spring is stronger.

So typically the wrong thickness of a mainspring worst-case will give you running problems. Either are not enough power to run the watch or too much power Which causes the balance wheel to have too much amplitude. But neither these conditions cause the watch to self-destruct and break their jewels

What are you jewels made of? Quartz crystal was popular at one time Garnet, natural Sapphire synthetic sapphire. With some of the natural stones you'll see fractures or cracks in the stone or at least they look like that they don't seem to be a problem. Anything that looks like a serious crack breakage sapphire is usually a impact. Most common impact on a pocket watches somebody dropped. Then of course unfortunately for watchmakers they're only human and accidents can occur which results at all sorts of things breaking unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Personally I would salvage the missing screws from some donor movement.  I also bought a random selection of screws "Assortment of Stainless Steel Watch Screws" for next to nothing.  As for using an Alum solution - I had great success with that removing a rusted stem from a stainless steel crown.  The best piece of advice I read on doing that was to keep the solution warm so that the reaction didn't take weeks!  I did it in a couple of hours with the solution in jam jar and the jam jar in a saucepan full of water which I left on an induction hob maintaining about 60C in the Alum solution.
    • I decided that it was time to tackle the piece that I'd set aside as my first project. The subject in question is a Gruen Veri-Thin pocket watch.  It winds and "runs".  On the time grapher, it has reasonable amplitude (240 or so depending on the position), but was loosing close to a minute a day.  The stem also has the annoying tendency to just come out when pulled, which makes it super hard to set the thing.  As with many things this one started sideways and just got more so.  I was able to overcome the mangled "tab" on the back case cover (a well placed, very sharp knife enabled me to get in when I couldn't get a purchase on the mangled tab with a case knife.)   I was then sort of shocked to find that one side of the dial was held down with some sort off tape or adhesive material as someone had broken the dial foot screw on that side and left the broken screw in the mail plate. The loose stem does in fact seem to have been a poorly tightened setting lever screw, but I'm afraid there may still be gremlins in the keyless works.  While I was able to get the stem to stay in by putting everything in the right place and tightening the setting lever screw (before I took it all apart for cleaning and inspection), it just didn't seem to all sit right. The final gremlin showed up when I was taking off the lower cap stones for the balance and escape wheel (yes the Gruen 380 seems to have a cape jewel on the escape wheel).  The balance stone came off fine (but that in fact is the smallest screw I've ever seen.  When I turned the movement around to get the one off the escape wheel setting, I found that the screw head had been mostly sheared off.  After some reading and looking at what I had, I decided to try and tease what was left of the screw out of the hole by nudging what was left with the corner of my smallest screwdriver.  After 20 minutes or so, I was able to get the remains of that screw out. The picture I'm including of the disassembled movement was taken before I got the second cap stone off, so in the picture, it's still attached to the main plate (for those looking carefully, you'll only see the one cap setting in the pic.) Now I'm left with: A broken dial screw inside the main plate that needs to come out A broken cap stone retention screw that I have in my parts tray, but that is strictly useless and needs to be replaced. The need to get another dial foot screw I'm contemplating solving the first problem by soaking the main plate in an alum solution.  I think the main plate is brass and shouldn't be affected, but I have not been able to confirm.  This seems like the easiest option as I can't really access both sides of the screw to use the pricey Bergeon tool (which I don't fancy buying unless I have to.) I have located a couple of donor movements and have questions out about whether or not the include the dial foot screw and prompting for pictures of the dial side so  evaluate the cap stone settings.  I've also found that a supplier in this country does have the cap stone settings, but isn't overly clear about whether the screws are included. Are these the types of things that one can scavenge out of assortments or is it best to just grab one of the donors assuming that they look like they have what I need?  
    • I visited this place last year just before they closed their counter service - amazing shop (filled from floor to ceiling!) and the guy that was working there was really knowledgeable and helpful!. Their website isn't as good as Cousins but I understand that if you fill out the contact form they have stuff that isn't on the site. https://gleave.london/mineral-flat-bottom-domed/
    • As always in this game the answer is “it depends “ because the first one worked out ok doesn’t mean all will. A case could be made in a way that it would not really matter much, sounds like your first example. However a case could also be made so that only a tension armoured crystal could be used. Generally you replace like for like to maintain the integrity of the watch.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...