Jump to content

Lecoultre 8 day Memovox desk clock ( alarm). Production dates


Eckehardt

Recommended Posts

I just bought this Lecoultre 8 day alarm memovox clock ( meaning voice of memory). What was the production date of these little jems. I know they started in 1950 for memovox watches . This has the 219 caliber movement in it. When did they introduce this movement and clock? Do they have exact production date records? ( 7 jewels) works great keeps good time. I like the stopwork of the winding mechanism and the alarm limiter. Here are some pics. I only payed $50 for this Gem at a flea market.

20180128_191644.jpg

20180128_191730.jpg

20180128_191745.jpg

20180127_161859.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oldhippy said:

The only info I can find is this. 1950 Creation of the Memovox, calibers 489 and 814.

 

I can tell you for a Jaeger-LeCoultre this is a very poor movement. No jewels to the train, just 7 jewels to the escapement.

 

Yeah most post war LeCoultres had 7 jewel movements unadjusted for a short period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/01/2018 at 3:59 AM, oldhippy said:

 

 

So I spoke with the vendor that sold it to me, which is an interesting story. When his father bought it, it was a promotional item ( demo or introduction model to the memovox). The vendor told me that most demo or promotional models came with 7 jewels. If sales went well they would keep producing these with upgrades. He also showed me a black cockpit Le- Coultre, also 7 jewels which seems odd. One would figure military grade clocks would have 15 or more jewels. But my clock was purchased by the vendors father back in 1951. It came in a box but not in a leather case. He said it's bern serviced twice since that time. The last time was in 2015. 

Edited by Eckehardt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
43 minutes ago, Eckehardt said:

I still think the movement still has an ingenious design. Using the Stackfreed type system for winding ( 1500s era) before the fusee. This also prevents the escapement from Galloping while winding it to the end. 

Funny when you think of it. Using an old system in what was at its time a modern day clock. Makes you wonder what was wrong with the design of the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The memovox was probably in its prototype phase in the 1950s. They probably wanted to make it more compact they probably used 7 jewels at first to test out the market. It's an alarm clock that probably gets banged around a lot so they left the jewels unadjusted. Keeping it basic simple. Why throw 15 jewels in a type of clock that takes abuse and if it doesn't sell well. So when the look caught the public eye and it sold. Le-coultre possibly refined the movement and made alarm watches with more jewels and better performance. To this day they still use the memovox dial in some of their watches and time pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I know the movement came in both 7 jewels and 15 jewel version, the 7 jewel versions where always sold under the lecoultre name and the 15 jewel versions sold only under the Jaeger Lecoultre name. They where probably made to a price with the bulk of the Lecoultre ones being sold into the American markets.

It seems to me it was seen as a clear seperation of the two nanes with Lecoultre marked clocks being seen as a cheaper alternative to the Jaeger lecoultre marked clocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed 
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...