Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just replaced the chronograph hands on an old watch that has a Valjoux 7734 movement in it. The new hands appear to sit a little higher due to the stems being slightly longer. Now the hour hand hits those chronograph hands. I think there is room to make adjustment. It would require bending the minute hand then the hour hand slightly. What is the procedure for doing this? Can it be done with the hands still on the watch? Thanks!!!

Posted

You can bend the tips of the hour hand slightly to clear the chrono hand, or you can also take a fine-cut file and reduce the height of the stem a little so that is doesn't interfer. You can bend the hands while still on the watch with brass tweezers. Be careful not to slip and scratch the dial.

 

J

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Id be tempted to remove the sub dial hands, grip them by the arbor ('stem') and rub the arbor on something like an Arkansas stone until they're the desired length. Tweaking the tilt of the hands is also doable, but less ideal, it might make them look slightly 'wrong' if nothing else. That being said I have done it a few times, my preference is for using some pegwood with a wedge-shaped tip and to push up on the hand from underneath, no metal to mark the hands and dial and you're also not touching the top of the hand. (unless you go to far and have to push it back down)

Perhaps obviously: just make sure the hands are at different position so they're not getting in the way of the hand you're trying to bend and go little by little. 

Edited by Ishima
Posted

Reducing the pivot length wont make any difference in the hand height, since the pivot is conical. Best way is to make the hole on the hand a bit bigger with a broach. 

Bending the hand on the pivot is a bad idea. Lifting the tip of the hand exert a great torque at the pivot making it to bend... worst, it can stick in the hole or break. 

The rule always applies that dont make any change on the original parts which were doing fine before the service. Make change to he parts which are new!

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes I agree I would broach the new hands to open up the hole so that they sit a little bit lower. The broach will give the hand pipe a nice taper. Take it slowly as you can't put material back on once it's gone! 

Posted (edited)

I agree with broaching the collet. For smaller collets, I use a needle.

Also make sure that the hour and minute hand collets are not just worn/too wide. I usually tighten them when necessary with a jewelling set.

General rule is to aim for a gap of one-hand's-thickness between hands. It's a bit vague, but it's a starting point.

Edited by rodabod
Posted (edited)

Broaching may be the better procedure, but if you have a hand arbor of generous length and it's sitting too high i maintain you can achieve the same result by shortening that arbor, because quite simply, the hand is lower before you even start to press it on, so of course the friction will max out at a point with the hand being lower than before. The fact that the pivot is a conical point doesn't negate that, not in my experience.

Edited by Ishima
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, szbalogh said:

Reducing the pivot length wont make any difference in the hand height, since the pivot is conical. Best way is to make the hole on the hand a bit bigger with a broach. 

Bending the hand on the pivot is a bad idea. Lifting the tip of the hand exert a great torque at the pivot making it to bend... worst, it can stick in the hole or break. 

The rule always applies that dont make any change on the original parts which were doing fine before the service. Make change to he parts which are new!

You guys are overcomplicating this. Ive reduced the stem height on hands with a fine cross-hatched file and it DID reduce the overall sitting height. ThEre is no need to broach, and all that can happen is the hand may no longer sit snugly on the pivot. I've also slightly bent the tips of sweep second hands to that they  clear crystal/glass  and also slightly bend them upward IF they happen to hit  each other.... I'm taking small amounts of torque not using a ham-fisted approach...sheesh!

J

Edited by noirrac1j
  • Like 1


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see. And is there a possibility to convert it to a springless system by replacing it with a standard split stem model?
    • Sharpening gauge.   I found the easiest side to do was the safety roller as the roller table laid flat on a block provided stability.  The other way requires a specific stump for the roller and pin to sit in, but may also grip better way.
    • Yes, the problem isn't so much with the 'background' radiation but inhaling or digesting loose flakes and dust that can become airborne.
    • The spring is so the crown pops out to the winding position when unscrewed.
    • Radium and the horrible story of the Radium Girls scares everyone - But there is also a lot of paranoia here.  I did a whole bunch of readings on a watch with Radium lume recently. My Geiger counter read 2µsv/h through the crystal with the sensor part of the Geiger counter right on top of the watch.  This measurement dropped off to the normal background rate of 0.18µsv/h as soon at the Geiger counter is just a few cms away. Measuring from the back of the watch and there is virtually no increase.  The rate went up to 5µsv/h from the dial and hands when the movement was removed from the case. To put this in perspective a Frankfurt to New York flight would give you about 50µsv of exposure and a chest x-ray about 100µsv.  Norwegian labour law states “The limit value for workers over the age of 18 years is set to 20 mSv per calendar year.” - that is the equivalent of 400 flights across the Atlantic! I will however point out at this point it is important that you don’t ingest the radium from the watch! One of the worst things you can do is scrape the radium off the dials and create radioactive dust that you could breath in! That being said… If for each radium lumed watch you work on you spend 15 minutes getting the movement out of the case and the dial and hands off and then another 15 minutes at the end putting the dial and hands back on your exposure would be less than 2.5µsv  Once you have the hands and dial off they can go in a box and put safely out of the way (probably good practice for any watch!). I believe the risks are negligible If you take precautions such as wearing a mask and gloves and wiping your work surfaces down with a damp paper towel and disposing of the towel, gloves and mask once you are finished  
×
×
  • Create New...