Jump to content

Quartz watches and demagnetizers


Recommended Posts

Some time ago I had a local advert for one of those cheap demagnetizers for sale.

A watchmaker contacted me and wanted to buy it (his own had malfunctioned) but he asked me if the hands of a quartz watch rotate if I use the demagnetizer on it. I had never heard of this thing before but I had a cheap quartz around, I used the demagnetizer on it and, indeed, the hands would rotate...

That got me thinking... Is there something behind this ? Can you test whether a quartz watch is faulty or not by simply using a demagnetizer on it ? If yes, do you test the electrical parts or do you just get to see whether the mechanical part (wheels, hands, pinions, etc.) works ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this works in the same way as some battery testers' "line clear" function that I've heard about before, but I use this regularly to 'jump start' and get less expensive quartz watches going again when doing battery changes. 
A bit like the circuit test function some battery testers have (that beep every second when detecting the electrical impulse remotely) you can use this as a basic - not full proof - diagnostic test, like the circuit test, will often show a problem it wont show every problem or give you a lot of information, but if you cannot make the hands do a full rotation no matter how you play with the position of the watch on the demag, it suggests that there's a blockage or broken tooth somewhere. 

Word of caution: it's best to not do this to a watch with the battery present.

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically I have a quartz citizen that is supposedly defective. I have a battery for it but I didn't try it because I'm missing the plastic insulator and battery clamp (that's how I bought it).

Could I try to see if it "works" with the demag first ? And afterwards I'll try the battery I guess...

I didn't know you can use this method to jump start movements. Thanks for that one!

Edited by Chopin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes, If you think of a quartz watch it generates movement through a small magnet which is given its torque to turn by the magnetic field generated around it, a considerably weak one normally. so often if a quartz watches oils start to dry or a bit of dust gets in the wrong place it grinds to a halt. Introduce a second, much more powerful, higher voltage (yet not powerful enough to overwhelm and damage the wheels) magnetic field generator, one that also oscillates much more rapidly, you can imagine how that will dislodge minor blockages like specs of dust and free up the movement of the gear train etc. 

So to answer your question about testing, "kind of" you can't prove a negative (the negative of there being no problem) but if you can find the right spot to place the watch and make the seconds hand do a couple of rotations without the hand hesitating, just progressing smoothly, then it's a good indicator that the gear train and motion work are in reasonable health. Yet that test alone won't tell you if the circuit board or coil are okay, the demag, as far as i know, doesnt work through those parts but directly effects the stepping motor. 

Also just a point of clarification in case i wasn't clear, i don't use this jump start method unless the watch fails to start up properly with a new battery. 

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the electric field (E&H) from the de-gaussing transformer (50Hz) UK, overrides the stepper motor control pulse and makes it run at a  random rate.  Most de-gaussing equipment for this purpose is an "open" primary coil  with the I`s missing. Just the E`s are used as the former.  The watch should be moved 2-3 feet away slowly from the the source whilst it is switched on. The electric Field then reduces over distance by inverse square law. I hope this helps.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like you know your electronics ecodec! but to clarify: moving the watch (or whatever object) away from the demag slowly is for the purpose of using the demag for its intended purpose, to remove magnetism, right? or is there a reason I should be doing this anyway? With my demag i don't get this rapid hand progression effect unless the watch is kept lying on the demag, usually at 'sweet spot'. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ishima said:

Sounds like you know your electronics ecodec! but to clarify: moving the watch (or whatever object) away from the demag slowly is for the purpose of using the demag for its intended purpose, to remove magnetism, right? or is there a reason I should be doing this anyway? With my demag i don't get this rapid hand progression effect unless the watch is kept lying on the demag, usually at 'sweet spot'. 

I did watch a video today where someone was using a quartz on a demag and when placed in one area the hands would function clockwise but when changing the position southwards a bit the hands would go counter-clockwise. Not sure if this is what it's all about.

Also, should I first try the battery on this watch ? As I mentioned I'm missing the metallic clamp (which I believe it doesn't just hold down the battery as it has some springs coming out that go into the movement but also seem to go towards the case back) and I'm also missing the plastic insulator.

Citizen 5810 is the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put this way: you wont do any harm either way, so it's up to you. 
I must say I'm not quite sure what movement that has off the top of my head, can you tell me the movement number?  (just incase i have anything more helpful to add) Unless that is also the calibre number? Picture maybe if you care to. 

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because it's a damn hard/rare to find movement/watch and I can barely find anything about it either. At least they published the movement manual and schematic online. That's pretty much all that I have from it.

I have tried it with a battery (keep in mind that the battery clamp and plastic insulator are missing) and it didn't work, but I didn't short start it as I'm not sure how to do it.

I have tried it on the demag and unfortunately the hands do not spin at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...