Jump to content

Seitz jeweling tool .


rogart63

Recommended Posts

I was happy to find a nice one here recently. Have tried to ream out a barrel hole on a 6217 but it got wrong. The reamer slide away and did a hole a little to much to the left. So that ended up in the scrap. I don't now how to avoid that? Should need have something to hold the movement plate in place with. But what? Is  there such a tool? Hold it for free is hard. something like the one with 3 arms on . 

597911d617365_s-l1600(9).thumb.jpg.7f4c4f3c0e65723d57dc6f0e0b877fb1.jpg

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that some of the Favorite jewelling presses were supplied with an uprighting attachment which was basically a plate which could be rigidly bolted to the base of the press on which there were 2 or 3 clamps. This allowed you to accurately position the work piece where you wanted it and then clamp it securely in position before reaming out the hole. This would be very useful if you were making replacement bridges or plates from scratch or rebushing no jewelled bearings. I don't know if Seitz did anything similar but I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

Then there are dedicated uprighting tools which do the same job.

However, although you could use an uprighting set up to ream out the barrel hole my preferred option would be to use the lathe for this job, mounting the barrel in a stepped collet and using a graver to recentre and size the hole to receive the new bush.

Obviously if you don't have access to a lathe then an uprighting set up is your next best option. After that it may be possible to broach out the hole by hand using the same approach that is sometimes advocated for rebushing clock plates. My understanding of this process is that the hole is usually only worn on one side, elongating it in that direction. The process involves using a file to elongate the hole in the opposite direction until it is symetrical with its true centre where it should be. You can then ream or broach the hole by hand as the tool will naturally stay on centre. I believe this is because the cutting edge of a broach or reamer is along it's side and the tool is naturally pushed to the path of least resistance which is cetrally in a symetrical but out of round hole, unlike a drill which cuts at it's tip and therefore makes it's own centre. I would think that the hole in the barrel is probably large enough to adopt this approach.

I hasten to add that I haven't tried this approach myself and may have it completely wrong. It would be interesting to hear CB's  or Old Hippy's views as they have vastly more experience with clocks and will be in a much better position to advise wether such an approach could be used for a watch barrel.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah.. I misunderstood. I thought that you meant you were re-bushing the arbor pivot hole in the barrel. It looks like you were doing the pivot hole in the main plate which makes the step collet in a lathe approach wrong. It can be done on a lathe but you would need a face plate with clamps to get the axis of the hole true to the spindle.

The broaching or reaming by hand method would also be a bad idea as the different thicknesses of the plate around the hole would result in the broach finding a totally different centre due to following the path of least resistance.

Your best bet for this job is an uprighting set up which works best if only the hole in the main plate is worn and the hole in the bridge is still good. What you do is you bolt the bridge (with the good pivot hole) into place on the main plate and then clamp the main plate to the table of the uprighting tool using the hole in the bridge to align the plate with the axis of the uprighting tool. Once securely clamped in position you remove the bridge from the main plate and ream out the hole knowing that it is centred true to pivot hole in the bridge and that when finally assembled the pivot will be upright between the plate and the bridge.

I believe that Mark did a video where he replaced a worn centre wheel bush with a jewel which demonstrates the process.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The numbers in the white bar are the average values over the last x seconds. You can set x in the menus. The row of +4s are the s/d of the last four measurement periods. This short history is useful if the traces are wavy. Yours are just too good (dead straight)! The angle of the traces (very slightly up to the right, i.e. rising with time) is a graphical representation of the +4s/d. The vertical separation of the two traces is a graphical representation of the beat error. In your case it's 0.0ms, so the two traces appear to be one.
    • One of the problems with a lot of the videos are they really don't know what they're doing. Typically at the end of the service the put the watch on the timing machine often waiting into the watches fully cased up. As opposed to checking the movement when it's running before it's all cased up. In other words if you're going to have a problem it's nice to bill the work on the dial side without them being there for instance. Then when it is placed on timing machine the only place it in one position they comment how wonderful the numbers look and that really isn't adequate. But typically on those YouTube channels no one notices all the other strange and bizarre things they are doing either.
    • I agree with what the others are saying - I got a set of these when I was starting out and have never managed to use them, and I do a lot of Seikos. The other catch is that a lot of them have a brass arbor, which means that the hook for the spring is too soft and will wear out after a few uses, making them doubly useless. My advice would be to save your money and put it towards a Bergeon generic set - pains me to say it, but it's the only real option, unless you get a used set of generic winders on something like eBay, but this can be a minefield, especially if you aren't 100% sure what you are looking at. I would recommend a half set, if you can afford it, or if you are building up a few at a time, then size 5, 6, 7 will cover a lot of the mens watches. As a side note, if you are doing Swiss and Japanese watches you will need right and left handed versions as the Swiss springs tend to have a right hand wind, and the Japanese tend to have a left handed wind (there are exceptions of course in each case). If in doubt, post a picture on here before you order and people will guide you.
    • Both ends of the Poljot 2612.1 hairspring were "secured" with some kind if crappy glue. They came loose when I was straightening the spring. I placed all parts on the balance cock and used liquid shellac (dissolved in a bit of alcohol) to attach them again. I found using liquid shellac works easier then heating the solid stuff. The job is already fiddly enough without the need for a heatsource as well, but you need to be patient as it takes a few days for the liquid shellac to fully harden.
    • Cuare’s reply covers the Chinese winder set and their capabilities very well.  An alternative to getting calibre specific sets like these is to slowly build a set of quality Swiss winders.  They are sold individually, so you could buy a Bergeon handle and the 2 correct diameter and wind direction winders you need now initially, and buy the other sizes as you need them over time.    If you come across a movement you lack a winder for and feel you won’t likely use that size winder often, then just buy a replacement mainspring, because they come already wound and ready to be pressed into the barrel   You can usually sidestep the need for having both left and right winders in each size by reversing the wind of the spring as follows - wind the spring into a slightly undersized winder, push it out into the correct size winder to suit your mainspring barrel (thereby reversing its direction), and finally press it out into the mainspring barrel.  Best Regards, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...