Jump to content

Seitz jeweling tool .


rogart63

Recommended Posts

I was happy to find a nice one here recently. Have tried to ream out a barrel hole on a 6217 but it got wrong. The reamer slide away and did a hole a little to much to the left. So that ended up in the scrap. I don't now how to avoid that? Should need have something to hold the movement plate in place with. But what? Is  there such a tool? Hold it for free is hard. something like the one with 3 arms on . 

597911d617365_s-l1600(9).thumb.jpg.7f4c4f3c0e65723d57dc6f0e0b877fb1.jpg

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that some of the Favorite jewelling presses were supplied with an uprighting attachment which was basically a plate which could be rigidly bolted to the base of the press on which there were 2 or 3 clamps. This allowed you to accurately position the work piece where you wanted it and then clamp it securely in position before reaming out the hole. This would be very useful if you were making replacement bridges or plates from scratch or rebushing no jewelled bearings. I don't know if Seitz did anything similar but I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

Then there are dedicated uprighting tools which do the same job.

However, although you could use an uprighting set up to ream out the barrel hole my preferred option would be to use the lathe for this job, mounting the barrel in a stepped collet and using a graver to recentre and size the hole to receive the new bush.

Obviously if you don't have access to a lathe then an uprighting set up is your next best option. After that it may be possible to broach out the hole by hand using the same approach that is sometimes advocated for rebushing clock plates. My understanding of this process is that the hole is usually only worn on one side, elongating it in that direction. The process involves using a file to elongate the hole in the opposite direction until it is symetrical with its true centre where it should be. You can then ream or broach the hole by hand as the tool will naturally stay on centre. I believe this is because the cutting edge of a broach or reamer is along it's side and the tool is naturally pushed to the path of least resistance which is cetrally in a symetrical but out of round hole, unlike a drill which cuts at it's tip and therefore makes it's own centre. I would think that the hole in the barrel is probably large enough to adopt this approach.

I hasten to add that I haven't tried this approach myself and may have it completely wrong. It would be interesting to hear CB's  or Old Hippy's views as they have vastly more experience with clocks and will be in a much better position to advise wether such an approach could be used for a watch barrel.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah.. I misunderstood. I thought that you meant you were re-bushing the arbor pivot hole in the barrel. It looks like you were doing the pivot hole in the main plate which makes the step collet in a lathe approach wrong. It can be done on a lathe but you would need a face plate with clamps to get the axis of the hole true to the spindle.

The broaching or reaming by hand method would also be a bad idea as the different thicknesses of the plate around the hole would result in the broach finding a totally different centre due to following the path of least resistance.

Your best bet for this job is an uprighting set up which works best if only the hole in the main plate is worn and the hole in the bridge is still good. What you do is you bolt the bridge (with the good pivot hole) into place on the main plate and then clamp the main plate to the table of the uprighting tool using the hole in the bridge to align the plate with the axis of the uprighting tool. Once securely clamped in position you remove the bridge from the main plate and ream out the hole knowing that it is centred true to pivot hole in the bridge and that when finally assembled the pivot will be upright between the plate and the bridge.

I believe that Mark did a video where he replaced a worn centre wheel bush with a jewel which demonstrates the process.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
    • Have you now repaired it? If so how is the time keeping.
    • Yes: that's it exactly, right down to the break in the spring!!
    • I've bought brands like Citizen, Seiko, Titoni, Tissot, Roamer. Strange thing is many of them were using ST96 movements. I'm not sure if the ST96 is original to that model or whether it was a replacement movement.  All the watches with nice looking dials were obviously refurbished, after-market dials. And all of them had over-polished watchcases. Some of them had non-original hairsprings, rejewelled pallet forks, watch crystals that don't fit and glued in with a generous amount of glue. One of them was totally not working because the pallet jewel was loose to the point that it almost fell off. But the sellers were very nice. The seller of the non-working watch gave me a complete refund. Some of them gave partial refunds. I would say don't by luxury watches on the internet, regardless of the country the seller is from. Don't believe the "serviced by master watchmaker" statement. Have realistic expectations. ( Do expect the occasional complete junk.) Do expect to do a complete overhaul and major repairs. Otherwise, watches from Mumbai are great. For clocks.... I'm not so sure.
    • In 2020,I picked up an Orient Mako II online. It ran at +15 seconds per day and after 3 years of resets more than weekly, it was time to crack the seal and take a shot at regulating it. Not having a timegrapher, I used a spreadsheet to track the time, referenced the Canadian NRC website, wore the watch between adjustments, and used the back end of some tweezers to lightly tap the regulator daily until it ran to within one second per day.   Two months later, it’s still running to within 1 second per day when measured over a week or longer, while daily variations are up to 9 seconds per day. For my purposes, its overall stability is surprisingly good. Is this method of adjustment “better” than adjusting to 5 positions using a timegrapher, since during the adjustment period the watch is already in the environment in which it’ll be used? Rob in Winnipeg 
×
×
  • Create New...