Jump to content

A Classic Cortébert From The 1950S


WillFly

Recommended Posts

I did a lucrative wedding gig last Saturday - and spotted, by chance, a very nice Cortébert from the 1950s up for auction.

 

Did I resist? In a word - no. Cortébert started off in the village of that name in 1790, by a chappie called Abraham-Louis Juillard. The firm went through all the usual hoops when quartz arrived, but this example is a nice watch from before all that hoo-hah.

 

post-64-0-70032700-1406102871_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-44789600-1406102881_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-58434500-1406102891_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the look of that one Will. I have one question though, why is the transmission wheel so off centre? I'm assuming it wind OK.

Actually, it's not as bad as it might look - there's always a slight distortion of the photo when I use the macro function on my camera! It winds perfectly.

 

I took a picture recently of one of my movements, and it looked as though the incabloc spring was out of kilter when, in fact, it was perfectly seated!

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked this carefully with a loupe - it's actually aligned OK - though the centre screw was ever so slightly loose, and I've tightened it counter-clockwise to make sure it's firm. There's something in the shadowing and the angles in the pic of the movement that makes it look odd... :startle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good Will, it was worth the comment just to tighten the screw properly.

Just as aside, I think handling a certain watch has put me into buying mode again. I'm sure it was a carrier of that disease you have! I've just purchased a Girard-Perregaux wristwatch at a very reasonable price. I'll post up a picture when it arrives from across the pond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice watch Will, congratulations on the new acquisition!

 

Geo, good eye even if it was only a picture glitch! Took me a minute to notice (I'm glad it was just the pic). And do please, post your new watch picture!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a similar one, used to be owned by my Uncle who was in the Royal Army Service Corps (RASC). He was wounded at Dunkirk, sent to Northern Ireland and honourably discharged due to his injuries in 1943. Inside is a 655 15j movement. I still have the original strap hidden away somewhere.

 

post-80-0-11231900-1406141157_thumb.jpg

post-80-0-17748000-1406141174_thumb.jpg

post-80-0-14888800-1406142028_thumb.jpg

 

....and I will get around to replacing the crystal in due course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....and I will get around to replacing the crystal in due course.

That's a great piece of history to have, especially when it belonged to your uncle. If it was me I would do no more than service it and keep it running, warts and all. Thanks for letting us see it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"A.T.P." - Army Trade Pattern - was used on British military wrist watches from the start of the war to about 1944. From then on until the end of the war and beyond, the marking was "W.W.W." - which I think means that the watch was waterproofed. Bravingtons, who dealt in Army Surplus, even marketed a waterproof watch as the "Wetrista"!

 

A.T.P. watches used all sorts of movements from Swiss makers - Jaeger, Unitas, Lemania, etc. - and could be very high quality. My Unitas is a superb watch of the type.

 

post-64-0-55734200-1406148209_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-30644400-1406148219_thumb.jpg
post-64-0-92193300-1406148271_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What this extra disk next to the pinion? Thats not part of the assembly 
    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
×
×
  • Create New...