Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all!

When regulating and adjusting a watch we have to close the regulating pins as much as possible around the hairspring, leaving a minimal space between them and it when the balance is in the neutral position (neutral position being achieved only by taking out the anker/pallets).

 

My question:

After making all the settings on the regulator (for timing) and the end-stud (for beat error) why couldn't we close the regulating pins all the way around the hairspring? Why do we have to leave a small space on the left and right of the hairspring (if we add up these two spaces we have to get no more then the hairspring thickness or less then that).

 

 

Could anyone provide more details on the phenomenon behind this thing? Maybe even a mathematical/physical explanation?

 

 

Thank you!

Bogdan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally the space between the hairspring and the regulating pins should be as much as another hairspring thicknes.

Less than that or more than that will lead to difference between horizontal and vertical positions rates which is bad as it leads to less accurate watch

br

emso

p.s: sent from my s****y phone so sorry for typing mistakes :-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also i forgot to mention that the distance between the regulating pins should be the same at the whole length of the pins.

If not you wont have stable rate when the watch changes positions

br

emso

p.s: sent from my s****y phone so sorry for typing mistakes :-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) Thank you for the explanation and the links. I had already read the first one.

I'm still curious about the physical explanation. Rolex doesn't have a regulator, they regulate the watch by modifying the inertia of the balance by modifying the screws on it. So why can't we close the regulator pins all the way? (after we set the correct position)

... And I think the answer is that there is no practical way of doing that because the hairspring will still slip through the pins...or, i don't know, gluing the hairspring to the regulator - this of course would mean not to move the regulator pins again...

I would like to post a link in which the phenomenon is explained a little, but I would like more then that :)


 

if the link doesn't work try searching on that site for "pinning to the stud & final adjustments"

Edited by matabog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would recommend "practical watch adjusting" by de'carle and also "watches adjustment and repair" by Camm (quite rare but an excellent resource)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many would disagree: https://www.rohm.com/products/faq-search/faqId/234 https://uk.farnell.com/c/semiconductors-discretes/transistors/bipolar-transistors/pre-biased-digital-bipolar-transistors https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/bipolar-transistors/8232832P?gb=s https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/bipolar-transistors/0580240?gb=s (RS don't have a specific category, but over 1000 "digital transistor" items).  
    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
×
×
  • Create New...