Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All,

I finally received the parts to complete my PUW 1461, and I’m glad to say it’s up and running.  It is fully wound and kept aside for 24 hours after which I will wind it fully again and then rest with the Timegrapher. Before I do that, I wanted to ask if anyone here knows the lift angle for this calibre? I can’t find it online and I’m trying to avoid doing that manual exercise of figuring it out if someone here already knows that the precise LA is. 
 

Thanks as always!

Sia

Posted
4 hours ago, SiZi said:

I’m trying to avoid doing that manual exercise of figuring it out if someone here already knows that the precise LA is. 
 

Seriously I would learn how to visualise the amplitude, once learnt and practiced a few times it can be performed in just one minute. 

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Seriously I would learn how to visualise the amplitude, once learnt and practiced a few times it can be performed in just one minute. 

I think Old Hippy is rubbing off on you Rich 😂

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, caseback said:

I believe it is 55 degrees.

Yes I too found those but they are not the correct movement. I will go with 55 for now, and then when I come back later to reservice this watch more perfectly I’ll try and figure out the LA myself as @Neverenoughwatchesrightfully suggested .

thank you everyone, as always!

Edited by SiZi
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, tomh207 said:

I think Old Hippy is rubbing off on you Rich 😂

 

Tom

Lol thats not a bad thing though. I think its good to learn from all the pros, after all they do or did this for a living. 

And yes I know what you meant. Sometimes I like to keep it short and sweet...to the point, and other times I can ramble on and on, and on and on and..........🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SiZi said:

Yes I too found those but they are not the correct movement. I will go with 55 for now, and then when I come back later to reservice this watch more perfectly I’ll try and figure out the LA myself as @Neverenoughwatchesrightfully suggested .

thank you everyone, as always!

Does your phone camera have a (super) slow motion video feature? Makes it very easy to see the true amplitude (and then adjust LA on the timegrapher). No need to draw on the balance wheel or wind to exactly 180° amplitude. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Lol thats not a bad thing though. I think its good to learn from all the pros, after all they do or did this for a living. 

And yes I know what you meant. Sometimes I like to keep it short and sweet...to the point, and other times I can ramble on and on, and on and on and..........🤣

Definitely not a bad thing, maybe even meant as a compliment 

 

Tom

Posted
47 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

Definitely not a bad thing, maybe even meant as a compliment 

 

Tom

For sure Tom for sure, I wonder how OH would have coped with me as his apprentice ? Or a more accurate question,  how long he would have put up with me ? 😂

I make great cups of tea 😂

Posted
On 12/24/2024 at 10:54 AM, Knebo said:

Does your phone camera have a (super) slow motion video feature? Makes it very easy to see the true amplitude (and then adjust LA on the timegrapher). No need to draw on the balance wheel or wind to exactly 180° amplitude. 

Yes, that I could do. So do I halve the total arc to determine altitude? 

Posted

So for example this is the PUW fully wound. I am seeing an approx amplitude of 217.5. At this amplitude the lift angle is about 41. 
PUW 1461 amplitude

but here’s a Pobeda / Slava / Zim 2602 that I tried the same with. I am seeing an amplitude of 197, but this shows the lift angle to be 32 (which sounds off, no?). So I don’t know if I’m doing this right.

Pobeda 2602 amplitude


Thanks for helping, as always! 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, AndyGSi said:

You should wind the movement until you get 180deg of oscillation.

You then change the lift angle on your timegrapher until it matches the 180Deg Amplitude.

 

 

 

I have tried this too and the results are the same about 32-34 degrees lift angle on the Pobeda/slava/zim 2602. See videos below, first one shows the marks matching up when wound to 180 amplitude, and the second one shows the movement at full wind for cross check (I see about 210 amp which was matching the Timegrapher at 32 LA when fully wound).

Am I measuring LA correctly? If yes, isn’t that a very low LA?

wind to 180 video:

full wind video:

 

 

Edited by SiZi
Posted
1 minute ago, AndyGSi said:

Normally you'd watch the amplitude from the top.

Are you saying that mark on the balance is 180Deg for the other mark when at rest?

Yes I made a mark on the main plate and a mark on the balance wheel exactly 180 degree away from the main plate mark, then I slowly wound till the dot on the balance wheel and main plate overlapped as you can see in the video. 

Posted
3 hours ago, SiZi said:

So for example this is the PUW fully wound. I am seeing an approx amplitude of 217.5. At this amplitude the lift angle is about 41. 
PUW 1461 amplitude

but here’s a Pobeda / Slava / Zim 2602 that I tried the same with. I am seeing an amplitude of 197, but this shows the lift angle to be 32 (which sounds off, no?). So I don’t know if I’m doing this right.

Pobeda 2602 amplitude


Thanks for helping, as always! 

This is why the 180° amplitude marks on the balance wheel and plate work so much better.

1 hour ago, SiZi said:

Yes I made a mark on the main plate and a mark on the balance wheel exactly 180 degree away from the main plate mark, then I slowly wound till the dot on the balance wheel and main plate overlapped as you can see in the video. 

This is easy to do when there are 2 or 4 spokes in the wheel. To be the most accurate, have the balance in beat, mark the wheel edge at one spoke and the plate/bridge at the opposite spoke. Wind the movement until both marks align, then set tg lift angle to have the amplitude read 180°. For marking up I use ink and a fine oiler or for fun luminous paint.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

This is why the 180° amplitude marks on the balance wheel and plate work so much better.

This is easy to do when there are 2 or 4 spokes in the wheel. To be the most accurate, have the balance in beat, mark the wheel edge at one spoke and the plate/bridge at the opposite spoke. Wind the movement until both marks align, then set tg lift angle to have the amplitude read 180°. For marking up I use ink and a fine oiler or for fun luminous paint.

yes in this case it was easier because it has 4 spikes so I could easily mark the opposite side as you have suggested. I still get the same reading. Just to double check, I wound up fully and took a slo mo video which I then further slowed down using an app, I placed a 360 degree protractor on the screen and tried to mark out precisely the angles. This gave me 360+45=405/2=202.5 amplitude which I then used as my benchmark on the timing machine and adjusted lift angle till I got 202.5 amp reading. It’s suggesting even lower than 32 LA. 
 

I must be doing the tests incorrectly, but I can’t tell how. I feel like I’m doing exactly what the video online and what you are suggesting. I’ll try the same tests with an Omega 620 I restored recently and see what results I get (since the lift angle on that one is well documented). I also have some more Pobeda 2602 movements I am restoring so I’ll check those too.
 

thanks everyone! 

Posted
5 hours ago, SiZi said:

yes in this case it was easier because it has 4 spikes so I could easily mark the opposite side as you have suggested. I still get the same reading. Just to double check, I wound up fully and took a slo mo video which I then further slowed down using an app, I placed a 360 degree protractor on the screen and tried to mark out precisely the angles. This gave me 360+45=405/2=202.5 amplitude which I then used as my benchmark on the timing machine and adjusted lift angle till I got 202.5 amp reading. It’s suggesting even lower than 32 LA. 
 

I must be doing the tests incorrectly, but I can’t tell how. I feel like I’m doing exactly what the video online and what you are suggesting. I’ll try the same tests with an Omega 620 I restored recently and see what results I get (since the lift angle on that one is well documented). I also have some more Pobeda 2602 movements I am restoring so I’ll check those too.
 

thanks everyone! 

Yes try the test on a movement with a known lift angle. A picture of the pallet fork might give us a clue if the LA is correct and a definition as to what LA is.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Some brands have widely varying lift angles, Omega has through its calibres a range from mid 30°s all the way up 70°.  Japanese brands also have some very low LA, I found quite a few Citizen in the low 30°s 

A simple definition of lift angle...degrees of balance wheel rotation during one lifting phase of the pallet stones/escape teeth. At the opposite end of the lever...the start to finish engagement of the impulse pin/fork. The event of escapement takes up a portion of the balance swing, which equates to an amount of degrees known as lift angle.

There is another definition....the amount of the impulse pin's movement of rotation from start to end of one escape event...but that basically adds up to the same previous definition. Looking at the shape and width of the fork slot and impulse pin shape and size may give an indication to a lift angle ?

A simpler answer as to ' what is lift angle ? '...Its just a number that we tap into a timegrapher, a criteria ( some information regarding the escapement design that it doesn't know ) that it requires from us so it can calculate and tell us how far a balance swings one way from its rest point. Something that we can already do more accurately just by watching the balance wheel. It's handy to have a timegrapher show us constant change if any but that isn't dependent on knowing the exact lift angle. So in reality knowing lift angle isn't really that important...is it ?....not to me anyway.... because I ain't designing or making a watch. 

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Some brands have widely varying lift angles, Omega has through its calibres a range from mid 30°s all the way up 70°.  Japanese brands also have some very low LA, I found quite a few Citizen in the low 30°s 

A simple definition of lift angle...degrees of balance wheel rotation during one lifting phase of the pallet stones/escape teeth. At the opposite end of the lever...the start to finish engagement of the impulse pin/fork. The event of escapement takes up a portion of the balance swing, which equates to an amount of degrees known as lift angle.

There is another definition....the amount of the impulse pin's movement of rotation from start to end of one escape event...but that basically adds up to the same previous definition. Looking at the shape and width of the fork slot and impulse pin shape and size may give an indication to a lift angle ?

A simpler answer as to ' what is lift angle ? '...Its just a number that we tap into a timegrapher, a criteria ( some information regarding the escapement design that it doesn't know ) that it requires from us so it can calculate and tell us how far a balance swings one way from its rest point. Something that we can already do more accurately just by watching the balance wheel. It's handy to have a timegrapher show us constant change if any but that isn't dependent on knowing the exact lift angle. So in reality knowing lift angle isn't really that important...is it ?....not to me anyway.... because I ain't designing or making a watch. 

This is an interesting point. For me, personally, I don’t want to get too academic when it comes to amplitude or beat error or lift angles. I really just want to be able to restore vintage watches into healthy functioning timepieces. All this lift angle thinking yesterday got me wondering if I might just take a more manual approach to obscure and less precise movements like the ones I’m working on by just capturing the balance wheel on slo mo and further slow it down on the computer and eye ball the amplitude to know it’s working within a healthy enough range + or - even 10% inaccuracy. Especially considering that even with amplitude there seems to be some debate over what is “acceptable” or not. If and when I restore high end precision pieces I think I will be more particular. But for these practice pieces maybe I’ll eyeball and then test by wearing and if all is good I’ll call it a day 🙂 

I am learning so much at present, everything is so new and exciting! And I really appreciate all the help you all provide here! 

  • Like 1
Posted

Your comments are basically the end point I was making. How deep do you want to delve into the mechanics, maths and physics of the escapement ? We're not making watches here...so not that deep, but understanding the basics are definitely needed for testing and correcting common escapement issues. Particularly when it comes to old pocketwatches that have been through the mill of escapement trial and error adjustments. There is some good books on this subject alone. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Lift angle of USSR 2602 movements is 42. What seen on videos/ amplitude readings is correct. The conclusion is that for some reason the timegrapher doesn't calculate amplitude correctly. Who cares? If You know how to see amplitude, then don't mind what timegrapher shows.

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...