Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm working on a 25-dollar, 1903 grade 269 Elgin pocket watch for practice. It looks to me like the pallet jewels are too close to the escape wheel. What do you think? What is the best position for pallet jewels? Is there a rule of thumb, or due they need to be place into the fork at a precise depth? Depending on what is said, my plan is to service the watch and then place it on the timegrapher and go from there. Pic 1 is the entrance stone and pic 2 is the exit stone. 

0003.png

0005.png

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Wilson said:

I'm working on a 25-dollar, 1903 grade 269 Elgin pocket watch for practice. It looks to me like the pallet jewels are too close to the escape wheel. What do you think? What is the best position for pallet jewels? Is there a rule of thumb, or due they need to be place into the fork at a precise depth? Depending on what is said, my plan is to service the watch and then place it on the timegrapher and go from there. Pic 1 is the entrance stone and pic 2 is the exit stone. 

0003.png

0005.png

Hi Wilson, i looked at your profile hope you dont mind but its good to know who we all are and what we are about. Seems you haven't visited to discuss for a very long time joining 10 years ago, fair to assume you have some experience. Giving us some info about you can help. Guide lines for depth of stone lock suggest less than what is shown the entry stone in particular. There are other things to consider before you think about adjustment of them, to note they should be the same and changing one's depth will alter the other's. Search for Nicklesilver's excellent explanation of the escapement adjustment before proceeding.  

This may be under the search words of pallet stones depth, escapement adjustment, moving banking pins. These are relevant aspects, also important are the safety clearances of the gaurd pin/safety roller,  fork horn/impulse pin of which moving the banking pins and pallet stones can affect.

Leaning this becomes invaluable information for escapement adjustment.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Extra information added
  • Like 1
Posted

From what I've read, the figure I've seen most is that the lock is 1/3 of the jewel width (Fried suggests this). But, I have also seen suggestion that it should be 1/4 or 1/5 jewel width.

The entry jewel does look a bit deep - it may be the camera angle. See how it performs on the timegrapher after a service. Is the amplitude is too low, try pushing the entry jewel in a touch

  • Like 1
Posted

You have to be careful with this one. The jewel slots look a bit larger than the jewels. After you remove the shellac, the jewels might be too loose to trial fit it for testing.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Wilson,

Actually, the most important thing when adjusting the pallets position is the drop lock. Yes, the entrance pallet looks to deep, but it is possible that the banking pin is to open and thus artificially enlarging the total lock. So the first thing to do is to check the banking pins position. When the pallets position is correct, the exit pallet mus be slightly 'deeper' at banking position than the entrance pallet

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...