Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After reading the posts on this forum I was thinking about adding a seiko 5 to my small collection, there are a lot of styles to choose from & I've noticed that some are marked on the dial 'automatic 21 jewels' and others are just marked 'automatic',  I was wondering are the movements all the same or are the ones just marked 'automatic' 17 jewel models ?.     :unsure:

Posted

atimegoneby hello... on most automatic Seikos, you have some with 21 jewels and others with just " Automatic " written on the dial. but if you remove the back cover, you'll " 17 or 21 jewels on the movement. I have 2 automatic Seikos. One has 17 jewels as you see as an avatar, and the others is here too in a post somewhere on the forum and has 21 jewels. I love them both ... so, don't be afraid about that and you can purchase one or more for your collection.. :) have a great day

Posted

I've now got 3 Seiko 5 watches! One works fine and keeps good time - it's quite modern with a display case back (21 jewels) - and the other 2 are going to help each other out, one way or another... And there's a 4th one on the way so, as you can see, I'm bingeing on them at the moment. There are also 2 others - all cheapies - on my  eBay watch list...

Posted (edited)

Wil, why you call " All cheapies "... I can't call this brand, even a Seiko 5, cheap...my 2 Automatics are super good and keep an excellent time..in a week, one of my Seikos lost about 2 or 3 minutes maximum...yes I bring my Seikos to a watchmaker ( jewelers in our country ) every 3 years.

However, compared to a Rolex or something like tath, yes its cheap.

Edited by SeikoWatch
Posted (edited)

No - you misunderstand. I didn't mean cheapies by comparison with other watches - just that I got them for a really good price on eBay, and the ones I'm looking at are also very cheap! :devil:

Edited by WillFly
Posted (edited)

ouhhhhhhhhh j'ai peur !.... : :fpc:..... its okay don't worry my friend.. but no need to write in big letters and dark black because I see well hey !. :lolu:.. hem.. using some émoticons is better. :D

Edited by SeikoWatch

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regarding the spring winders, I made my own and used copper pipe reducers as the tubes to retain the spring. You will need to cut out a section for the end of the spring to protrude but if you watch one of the many videos on this subject that will make sense. You can find a selection of sizes on Ebay for very little cost. I'll attach a pic showing one of mine.  Good luck!
    • There were things bothering me about this discussion that took me a while to figure out the problem. In the image below it appears to be the spring may be pushing up? Normally when Omega has a spring pushing up the pinion has a pivot with a bridge to hold it in place so in other words the spring can push on something that stationary as opposed to this which appears to be floating? To understand the problem with the above image we need another image of side view which I have below. In my image down below on the left-hand side it agrees with the image up above. But the only problem is the left-hand side is defective and the right-hand side image is the way it's supposed to look. Then Omega if you can access the right documents does explain how and why this problem occurs. With the pinion floating around it might be assumed that you support it when putting on all the hands but you do not because as noted below if you do this small bush on the pinion will relocate out of position exactly what we see in the image up above.   Then Omega does not mention this but there is a possibility of also damaging the pinion and causing the bush to move to where it's not supposed to be when removing the hands.   
    • Maybe show us 1) the watch, 2) timegrapher readings in DU, DD, PU, and PD.
    • The timegrapher displays significant beat error variations in the dial-up position. When the watch is lying flat (face up), the beat error is much higher than in other positions. Beat error readings are inconsistent, with especially large gaps in the face-up position.  Please help !  
    • Looks like an open-access journal that runs as a glorified pre-print server with no true peer review, so it’s not easy to judge the veracity of the conclusions.
×
×
  • Create New...