Jump to content

Estate Sale Find Repair


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, DieselBurner said:

 Looks to be a Hermle movement, so not too old.  

Lol!  Not even close! 😆  It's a Sam Hueng movement.  A Korean firm.  So I think this is post-war, 1940-1960?  Maybe pre-Korean war since it doesn't say "South Korea?" 

The chime side winds clockwise, but the power side winds counter-clockwise.  Looks like someone has been trying to wind the power side clockwise for who knows how many years and the spring was been unwound to the state you see in the pictures.  It doesn't seem damaged though, and I was able to wind it in the correct direction.

20240524_131221.jpg

20240524_144711.jpg

20240524_145713.jpg

20240524_145807.jpg

20240524_152454.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case style and the movement are in the style of American. If you take it apart you will need mainspring clamps as the springs are strong and very long 

 

 

 

220011_Anglo_American_wm6.jpg

il_fullxfull.4156488851_t9d1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my untrained eyes, wheel 1 does not look too bad. Wheel 2 appears to be showing some wear on the left hand face of the teeth. Wheel 3 appears to be a little bit worse than wheel 2 in the same place.

The faces on the pinion on wheel 3 appear to be rolled over/deformed as well.

I'm not sure what the tooth profile should be, but I think the wheels are showing some wear.

It might be the angle of the photos though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is quite common with these clocks. The problem cause the springs are so powerful but the brass? is soft so wear occurs on one side of the teeth. Clean up the bur and with needle files shape them a little but do not file them shorter as the depth will be wrong and they will not run smooth.  Your photo doesn't show it but I expect the wheel train has lantern pinions which can take wear so the pivots can be loose in there holes a little more than the fixed type. This is the style of lantern pinions.

download.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael1962 said:

To my untrained eyes, wheel 1 does not look too bad. Wheel 2 appears to be showing some wear on the left hand face of the teeth. Wheel 3 appears to be a little bit worse than wheel 2 in the same place.

The faces on the pinion on wheel 3 appear to be rolled over/deformed as well.

I'm not sure what the tooth profile should be, but I think the wheels are showing some wear.

It might be the angle of the photos though.

Your untrained eye is very perceptive!  Wheel 1 isn't too bad.  It is the last wheel in the train so maybe it doesn't get as much power to wear the teeth?  The teeth on wheels 2 and 3 are both rolled a bit on the worn edge, wheel 3 more than 2.    

23 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

This is quite common with these clocks. The problem cause the springs are so powerful but the brass? is soft so wear occurs on one side of the teeth. Clean up the bur and with needle files shape them a little but do not file them shorter as the depth will be wrong and they will not run smooth.  Your photo doesn't show it but I expect the wheel train has lantern pinions which can take wear so the pivots can be loose in there holes a little more than the fixed type. This is the style of lantern pinions.

 

They are lantern pinions.  I'll check the pivots of the pinions and file the burrs off of the wheel teeth.  Thanks for the insight! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there is a definite wear pattern but follow old Hippys advice and face up the teeth and don’t shorten them , check the bushings and pivots also. If they are lantern pinions and worn they can br replaced easy enough.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Michael1962 said:

The small pinion that is on wheel 3 is a normal gear pinion.

Did clockmakers mix the two types of pinion in the one movement?

The non-lantern pinion and wheel combo are actually for the motion works.  It drives the center wheel.  Both the power and chime trains (including the regulator) are all lantern pinion style.  The trundles in the lantern pinions all look to have no direct wear from the wheels - no rutting evident under magnification. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its based on Seiko 7001,   go on to    alldatasheet.com .  I think its a combined set mech. You likely to have knock the set lever out of whack. Rgds    
    • Welcome to the WRT forum.
    • More photos of watch for reference. 
    • 1) flat jewel for wheels: picture shows a jewel with oil sink. Straight hole. Not hole 8 or 9. 2) balance jewel, olive hole: picture shows a domed jewel without oil sink. B + sizes. 3) flat jewel, olive hole: hole size 8 or 9 only. Frank
    • Hey folks, first time poster here. Starting into watch repair and swapping out a movement with another and have a donor watch. I incorrectly yanked a stem out that I assumed was a split stem but I think the case back just is hard to get off. By doing this, I can put the stem back in but it fairly easily pulls out now so I think I broke something. Not a huge deal as this was the donor but I’m hoping to get confirmation that I toasted a particular piece.  I know movements generally have a screw or push release for the stem if not a split stem so I think I just made a rookie whoopsy. The case back doesn’t have a groove for a knife nor is a screw down which is what led me to the split stem assumption… I may just need a razor blade to create a gap in the case back to get a knife underneath. On the donor I could certainly push the watch back out of the case, just don’t want to make the same mistake on the watch I’m rehabbing. is anyone familiar with this movement or can definitively tell if I broke the donor piece that holds in the stem? Not a huge deal since it’s a harvester movement for me. thanks all, looking forward to learning a lot!
×
×
  • Create New...