Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dismantling a 'family' clock. Managed to remove the stuck-on ceramic dial without cracking it & found what looks like an inventive previous repair. Grateful for views on what might have happened back then & what the original part was.

20240407_131938.jpg

Posted
36 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I need to see the whole movement please photos of the back and front and between plates a photo of the case would also be good 

It's in bits now: hope the attached pics help. The back plate bears the words "....British United Clock Co Birmingham  England". Thanks for your interest.

20240407_143611.jpg

20240407_143542.jpg

20240405_151831.jpg

20240405_105951.jpg

20240405_105412.jpg

Posted
3 hours ago, dnhb said:

Dismantling a 'family' clock. Managed to remove the stuck-on ceramic dial without cracking it & found what looks like an inventive previous repair. Grateful for views on what might have happened back then & what the original part was.

20240407_131938.jpg

Nothing seems modified or not original. What are You concerns?

Posted
10 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

Nothing seems modified or not original. What are You concerns?

In the top (original) photo there is a coil of wire between the plate and the lower wheel which I thought might not be original....

Posted (edited)

It is all original and you do not have missing parts.  

Those movement were cheap to make so they are rough and ready. To help with the action of the balance make sure both balance tips (points) are sharp like you would have if you sharpened a pencil you need a lathe to do this and a small Arkansas stone and a drop of oil. The two cups must be clean and roughness in side remove with a fine countersink and re-oil, don't have to much end shake.

Edited by oldhippy
Posted

I suspect that may be a friction drive between the movement and the hands / motion works, to allow for time setting?

Something broadly equivalent to the cannon pinion friction drive in many watches.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, dnhb said:

In the top (original) photo there is a coil of wire between the plate and the lower wheel which I thought might not be original....

The coil of wire is a spring that is there to press and create friction for the 'clutch' that slips when the time is set.

Posted

Thanks for your advice, guys, which, as a newbie, I respect. However, please excuse my offering the following observations: while the spring is completely compressed, as the original photo indicates,  it shows no sign of expanding when pressure is applied to reduce the compression; there is no evidence of any torsional force; it is not uniformly cylindrical & its ends do not have the form I'd expect those of a manufactured spring to possess. To my inexperienced eye it looks just like a coil of wire that's been created to achieve the desired spacing between 2 components.

Posted

Hi. It may look like a coil but it is compressed enough to provide the tension to enable you to move the hands.

the coil is compressed via the bush under the plate on the arbour. In better quality clocks a three leaf spring is used in the same way again compressed via a bush. Bear in mind these were mass produced and lacked many refinements and in large numbers. Most probably ended up scrapped as the repair costs was more than the clock.   If you take into consideration the quality, the plates are poor the wheels are rough which is commensurate with mass produced movement.

Posted

You won't see any obvious movement with it as it is - but if you apply a bit of force, you should find that the small pinion at the top end in the first photo can be turned relative to the large wheel, but with significant friction.

 

All conventional clock and watches must have some friction slip "clutch" mechanism. to allow the hands to be set without breaking the movement; without that clutch, the hands could not be set, other than by stopping and starting the whole movement.

These are some other examples, from a box of scrap clock bits I have; the first uses an overgrown cannon pinion style setup, with a sleeve that's been pinched or twisted slightly to make it grip the shaft - you can see the steel shaft through the slot in the brass sleeve.

The others are spring loaded, more open variants of the one you have:

IMG_2278.thumb.jpg.31111ffe97c698132dd2b8e612d89829.jpg

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

You won't see any obvious movement with it as it is - but if you apply a bit of force, you should find that the small pinion at the top end in the first photo can be turned relative to the large wheel, but with significant friction.

 

All conventional clock and watches must have some friction slip "clutch" mechanism. to allow the hands to be set without breaking the movement; without that clutch, the hands could not be set, other than by stopping and starting the whole movement.

These are some other examples, from a box of scrap clock bits I have; the first uses an overgrown cannon pinion style setup, with a sleeve that's been pinched or twisted slightly to make it grip the shaft - you can see the steel shaft through the slot in the brass sleeve.

The others are spring loaded, more open variants of the one you have:

IMG_2278.thumb.jpg.31111ffe97c698132dd2b8e612d89829.jpg

 

Thanks for the education RJ. I did find, in line with your comment, that I could move the pinion & wheel independently & now understand why being able to do that is important to time-setting. However I remain convinced that on my clock the friction has simply been achieved by an ad hoc 'cylinder' of wire of the length necessary to achieve the desired effect: it is not a 'manufactured' part like the springs in your helpful picture.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...