Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Having had success replacing the resistor and capacitor in a few 218 and 219 circuits, I've gone down the rabbit hole trying to find a modern replacement transistor. I've searched everywhere I know to look for specs on the original transistors and come up empty.

My last digital design class was too many decades ago, so I was hoping one of y'all out there is a EEE (Electronics Engineer or Expert) and can offer some advice.

For example, let's say I'm considering an NPN digital transistor. When I look up the part, it's available with a built in 47k, 22k, or 10k ohm input resistance.

image.png.1d06937d7764cadb74c20883d4cd1e35.png

image.png.5338b647d413ba47ecc3e63dbf2fe4d9.png

How does one decide? I assume that's what the starred *R resistor in the schematic below is for.

218l-143090867.gif.5fbc05ea76c80577ce21aa5a4d0b6468.gif

And then how do we make the decision between a digital and bipolar transistor?

Posted

No, You don't need 'digital' transistor. What You need is small comon use transistor, where small usually means Ic max about 100 mA. The other thing important is to know the material of the transistor - well, looking on the schematic we see it is NPN, which usually means it is silicium transistor. But You have to check to confirm, as it is possible that they may have used germanium one. So, use digital multimeter and check the Uf of the PN junctions, directly on the PCB (remove the baterry). If it is about 650 mV it is silicium and if about 200 then germanium. 

If it is, as I suppose, silicium, then use BC548C or similar. If the H21 is much bigger than needed, then the index wheel will move twice faster, and to avoid this, You will have to increase the '*R' on the schematiic.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, nevenbekriev said:

If the H21 is much bigger than needed, then the index wheel will move twice faster, and to avoid this, You will have to increase the '*R' on the schematiic.

… or avoid the _C type and use _A or _B transistor.

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

No, You don't need 'digital' transistor.

 

what? We live in the digital world everything is digital today except I believe this is a linear circuit seems like it should need something that's not digital. then I suspect pure digital transistors designed for high-speed switching might not actually be happy to biased it into to a linear mode.

4 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

The other thing important is to know the material of the transistor - well, looking on the schematic we see it is NPN, which usually means it is silicium transistor.

I wondered about this because for instance the 214 came out in the early 60s and I don't know how plentiful silicon transistors were? Then yes the 218 is later but the circuitry is basically very similar.  

out of curiosity as doing a quick patent search the see if it tell us what the transistors they used our and right this instant know they have not been to have schematics though. Then unlike general concept patents Bulova was very nice and made exact patents for a variety of their watches because it wanted the mechanical + aspect patented

.then I did remember something about the transistor so I searched for a transistor number and Bulova this came up first all snipped out an image. Now you have at least one transistor that was used in tuning fork watches. So this will give you an idea of specifications. Then yes I really like where the meaning of Accutron comes from you can see it in the title down below. Which works out nice for them now that they have all kinds of electric watches including one powered by static electricity and it does not go against the name which everyone thinks means tuning fork watch. Yes you really should check out the nifty static electricity watch it's really quite amusing.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/five-star-general-omar-bradley-special-bulova-accutron

image.png.c366a867d23c513a0c34b2817910bbdc.png

 

 

 

 

 

hadn't quite closed out my patent search basically the patents for the 214 we have this.

image.png.8cfdac63b3f14c31a96f135975bd022c.png

then before I closed out my Google patent search added in NPN and it only came up three entries of attaching one of them as it says silicon.

US3421309 Bulova NPN silicon.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

So-called "Digital transistors" are just transistors with appropriate resistors included in the package to allow them to be driven directly from digital logic ICs & microcontrollers etc.

You definitely need a normal transistor for the Accutron.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Well, the first attempt was a wash because I bought 22nF capacitors instead of 220nF. So after a second order, I soldered everything onto my SMD breadbaord.

I de-soldered the electronics from a 218 movement that I had previous tested and hooked my little circuit up in its place, and hooked the whole thing up to 1.4v from my power supply.

...and realized I'd gotten the pinout of the transistor wrong. After I removed and re-soldered it in the correct orientation, I realized I had the connections to the coils backwards.

Once I fixed that, THE FORK STARTED VIBRATING! I could not have been more excited!!!

IMG_20240411_233649.thumb.jpg.e8c68c0723f641a8b73c1c9697e96f7b.jpg

image.thumb.png.7e4ad9d6767fe82feae9259bf193dbe4.png

IMG_20240411_233644.thumb.jpg.0fa5d70ca7a0f5a54ba8e980869a2db3.jpg

If you haven't guessed, my somewhat evil plan is to make a surface-mount PCB replacement for the resistor, capacitor, and transistor in the 218s. Why? Because why not?

The transistor is in a SOT-523 package, the resistors and capacitor are 0402 (1005 metric) packages. I have to redo the circuit to get the transistor pinout correct, but here's what I have in mind:

imagebmp.jpg.cf4ab2e4e8822924b8b8d8be521d07eb.jpg

  • Like 7
Posted

This sure is fun 😄 Now that the proof of concept works, it's time to prototype.

Looks like I've got just about 1.6mm of height from the plastic component tray to the top of the main bridge. With an 0.6mm thick board and the 0.9mm tall transistor, this should fit without any modifications other than removing the existing components.

For anyone wondering, the transistor is CMUT2222A bipolar NPN. R1 is the bias resistor, which is just a 0 ohm jumper for this setup.

R2 is the 2.2M ohm resistor, and C1 is the 220nF capacitor. DR goes to the drive coils, FB goes to the feedback coil.

image.thumb.png.81c98c65ad62733bea5ef0674e37572a.png

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back.

Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.

20240427112919731.thumb.png.e425da41ee737ee8be32b76f423c2fcf.png

20240427125438979.thumb.png.45beaa605b0c4ff7629416689c6d04c8.png

20240427125524271.thumb.jpg.9e5d7105b416ae8376b555131b0e402e.jpg

 

But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).

AccutronTest.thumb.jpg.b39c09859e76a4ed8a47a2d8e74056f7.jpg

 

Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections?

I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol.

I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.

20240427131447116.thumb.png.099b54c67dc2295e208a316c40ce8988.png

20240427131611202.thumb.png.cbcbd195bfa847f31222b9aaae152710.png

20240427131816817.thumb.png.e2c5fd28e697f5daeb709c79375ba3f5.png

20240427131905884.thumb.png.882d25c08c929e5dff2a02c04533bf52.png

20240427131958655.thumb.png.ae9e5bf8fa8f5a727462720692c68ed8.png

Posted

Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs.

After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!

IMG_20240501_203242.thumb.jpg.aed9329d0ea6f15df3911a015690703b.jpg

20240501211733023.thumb.jpg.b32d9c98d9c3910828d91819a73061a2.jpg

20240501211813301.thumb.jpg.5cb11d818f471567944c81c17de01957.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
On 4/3/2024 at 4:17 PM, rjenkinsgb said:

So-called "Digital transistors" are just transistors with appropriate resistors included in the package to allow them to be driven directly from digital logic ICs & microcontrollers etc.

You definitely need a normal transistor for the Accutron.

The term "digital transistor" is not a term of art--at least in the modern world.  A lifetime ago, there was such a thing as DTL (Diode Transistor Logic).  Resistors were involved, but I am not aware that they were ever integrated into the transistor package.

Posted
7 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

The term "digital transistor" is not a term of art--at least in the modern world.  A lifetime ago, there was such a thing as DTL (Diode Transistor Logic).  Resistors were involved, but I am not aware that they were ever integrated into the transistor package.

Why do you doubt? It is a common current name for transistors with included base and base-emitter resistors. They are not „digital“ by itself but can be used in digital circuits without added components. 

Frank

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/2/2024 at 3:03 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

The term "digital transistor" is not a term of art--at least in the modern world.

Many would disagree:

https://www.rohm.com/products/faq-search/faqId/234

https://uk.farnell.com/c/semiconductors-discretes/transistors/bipolar-transistors/pre-biased-digital-bipolar-transistors

https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/bipolar-transistors/8232832P?gb=s

https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/bipolar-transistors/0580240?gb=s

(RS don't have a specific category, but over 1000 "digital transistor" items).

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Many would disagree:

Well, I cannot argue with what these websites say.  When you dig into the datasheets, you often find the term "pre biased" and such.  The marketing department can call them what they wish--to that I concede. However, it is not a term of art.  The term is not in my copy of the IEEE dictionary (c) 1996.  Neither is it in my copy of The Art of Electronics. 

  • 6 months later...
Posted
On 2024/4/28 at AM5点14分, ManSkirtBrew said:

为了清晰和易于测试,我重新制作了该图表,翻转电路以匹配物理手表的布局。

accutron.thumb.png.bb71d8b485fd568bcdbab11e26baa554.png

Excuse me, is there a circuit diagram of 214?

Posted
2024年4月28日上午5点14分,ManSkirtBrew 说:

为了清晰和易于测试,我重新制作了图表,转弯电路以匹配物理手表的布局。

accutron.thumb.png.bb71d8b485fd568bcdbab11e26baa554.png

请问有214的电路图吗,遇到了一个很奇怪很麻烦的问题。

IMG_0547.jpeg

IMG_0544.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/26/2024 at 8:42 PM, ManSkirtBrew said:

They showed up! It's a perfect fit. Can't wait to populate it and try it out.

IMG_20240426_153309.thumb.jpg.36d0cc1c881057fe154fc5141900ff54.jpg

 

 

 

Would u share the PCB design? Or are you selling these?

Posted
4 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

Would u share the PCB design? Or are you selling these?

I'd be happy to do either! I ordered enough parts to make 10 pieces, but you can see the entire circuit design in the pictures I posted above.

I should have the Gerber files kicking around here somewhere, so if you want to PM me for them I'd be happy to email them out. Or I can solder you up a board and we can work out a price.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
×
×
  • Create New...