Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

a friend has a clock from around the late 1800s, which has a wheel in the strike mechanism that has lost some teeth.

The movement is stamped Vincenti & Cie. I've looked for one of these for a couple of years & eventually found one that looked idenical, but turned out to be slightly smaller. 

 

While comparing the two I found a clear visual distinction between them - the upper pillar is hidden behind the pendulum suspension bracket on the larger one, while it's visible at the side on the smaller one.

Searching ebay further, I found numerous movements that looked identical to the smaller one, but apparently from different makers?

Then one identical in appearance to the larger one, which the seller confirmed was the same ~90mm diameter - but again from a different maker!

 

I've received that this morning and it does appear that the main movement (disregarding the differences for a different case fitting) is absolutely identical.

 

Were these all made to standard patterns and the named makers part of some cooperative, or something like that? I was originally expecting each make to be quite different in detail, even if broadly similar in general photos.

 

The details in these two are just too well matched to be coincidence - even extra hole just above the centre and the dot makings to identify the removable pivot blocks seems standardised??

 

(These & the slightly smaller serviced one in my intro post are the only clocks I've examined or worked on, so my knowledge is rather minimal)

 

I will post separately about the damaged wheel and either movement substitution or repairing the wheel.

Thanks, Robert.

 

 

Vincenti & Cie movement:

IMG_2111.thumb.jpg.1b6663a88f63a10d7c9fd78b908991fd.jpg

 

IMG_2112.thumb.jpg.796c078342cc8b00298605f8f886cd70.jpg

 

IMG_2115.thumb.jpg.dfa55e487693021610bae19217729397.jpg

 

IMG_2117.thumb.jpg.bba718a69cc07ac2e448349f1097a309.jpg

 

HP & Co movement:

 

IMG_2113.thumb.jpg.1243e85eb7d04c224c6a70381da9334f.jpg

 

IMG_2114.thumb.jpg.706d91bda87bd7803229f93647cb92ff.jpg

 

IMG_2116.thumb.jpg.f6ba3027665863f787fd4cb0e742bc0c.jpg

 

IMG_2118.thumb.jpg.4e931a4b02c79648fbcfbdecf3def6d1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Hi Robert. Like a clown I missed the pictures. Measure the distance between the pivots and the pitch of the teeth  I might have one as I have a drawer with some french clock bits in  

Hi Robert. Like a clown I missed the pictures. Measure the distance between the pivots and the pitch of the teeth  I might have one as I have a drawer with some french clock bits in.   Previous repair broken down, as it runs directly on the barrel there is a lot of torque and it broke

Posted

OK thanks, will do - I'll strip it down tonight, hopefully.

The distance between plates is 30mm, but I cannot measure the diameter or pitch while the movement is assembled.

Posted

I have restored hundreds of French clocks. I know what you are saying that they look alike and yes they do but fitting pats in to another not so easy, there is 9 times out of 10 some difference. As for wheels you have depth, wheel count pinion count, as already mentioned length and pivot length diameter of the wheel and it has to be in the same position.  

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...