Jump to content

Setting spring replacement - heat treatment?


Recommended Posts

Morning, 

I recently bought a 1920s ‘Solvil’ (Paul Ditisheim) hunter pocket watch in an English Dennison case. It has the usual Ditisheim refinements- ‘affix’ balance and alloy hairspring.

As you might expect of this type of watch, it has negative set keyless works. I immediately found that the hands would not set and so as part of the service I carry out on new acquisitions, I checked the setting spring. This has snapped and parts for these are few and far between.

I decided to make a new one- I got hold of a plate of mild steel of the same gauge (0.5mm) as the spring. The broken spring makes a handy template and is glued to the plate. I’m almost there with the cutting/drilling and will then file it and check for fit. 

Before I put it under any strain, I think I will need to harden and temper it. I’ve never done this before and would appreciate any guidance from those with experience. I’m thinking harden by heating to cherry red (800 degrees?) but how best to cool it? Oil or water? Then, temper by bluing it (295 degrees) I’m thinking of the elegant blued springs under the dial of most English pocket watches, but the original is not blued, so I can’t accurately follow the process used in its manufacture. I will probably make a set of three (a useful tip from a clockmaker!)

I’ve added some photos of the old spring in situ, and progress on the new one.

Cheers,

Bill

IMG_6990.jpeg

IMG_6991.jpeg

IMG_6702.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bill241 said:

I got hold of a plate of mild steel

Unfortunately if you have used mild steel you will have little hope of hardening and tempering it, it simply doesn't contain enough carbon.

You need to use a steel with a higher carbon content like tool steel or spring steel. One good source for this is engineers feeler gauges which can be picked up relatively inexpensively and provide a range of thicknesses of material. this will then harden and temper in pretty much the way you have described.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Marc, clearly I have a lot to learn about metallurgy. I’d expect the cutting of tool or spring steel to be a lot harder to cut into a precise shape- I expect I’d have to anneal it first? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Marc said:

Unfortunately if you have used mild steel you will have little hope of hardening and tempering it, it simply doesn't contain enough carbon.

You need to use a steel with a higher carbon content like tool steel or spring steel. One good source for this is engineers feeler gauges which can be picked up relatively inexpensively and provide a range of thicknesses of material. this will then harden and temper in pretty much the way you have described.

over the years and various lectures I've seen it's actually quite common for people starting off making components did not to grasp that steel comes in various grades including stainless steel and they really don't harden at all. The last lecture somebody was making a part just like yours and he went into the scrap bin and grab something random I think it was packing steel in other words the blue colored Steelman put around large boxes had because was blue in color he perceived that it could be hardened. Only to discover like you that it could not be.

Then in the audience was a machine is to suggest that the exact same suggestion up above. Thinking about it I don't know if we ever got a second lecture on how well the new steel worked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bill241 said:

Thanks Marc, clearly I have a lot to learn about metallurgy. I’d expect the cutting of tool or spring steel to be a lot harder to cut into a precise shape- I expect I’d have to anneal it first? 

Annealing the steel has more to it and is of more of a hit and miss process than hardening and tempering. Fun though. 

20231202_161444.jpg

20231202_171846.jpg

20231202_171923.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...