Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After a run of two ulcer watch resurrections a straightforward service on an unmolested AS 2063 was looking good until we found the classic broken set lever spring part No 51.090.06. They are very complicated on this movement since they incorporate a pivoted three gear system which controls the date and time settings. A search soon showed that all parts for this series are reasonably available except for this damn thing - they clearly like to self destruct. However, some kind sellers had listed a few similar AS series movements also using the part and after extending the search we found one in the UK. Photo list here of the factory packaging so you can see the range of movements this part fits and thus extend your search options .

So the two position spring gave a nice basic wind and second position, a well engineered and simple Non-plastic fast date change. Could not see how the hand setting was achieved - I failed to find any help on line and went to bed defeated. So after a hard examination it appears that the there is a third setting position - but no clear cutaway on the spring end part. The force required is too damn much since the sharp rise in the actual spring is too severe. This also causes excessive strain on the slender arm. In the photo below the broken lever has been laid next to the new one already in place and you can see that the shape has been factory modified. The blue arrow points to what is a well disguised third setting position. . The stiff action was relieved by stoning down the sharp area highlighted by the red arrow. Hope that helps. Coffee time..

DSCF6974.thumb.JPG.989e10fcf2ddc64d293b3ebeeb0fad52.JPG
 

DSCF6975.thumb.JPG.03833ae4fb762dc785262249c2f36a1a.JPG

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hello,

 

Yes, I'm up against the same dilemma on the AS 2063. I replaced the setting lever spring (which includes gears for actuating the quick-set and winding the mainspring) but have not been able to achieve that "third position" for adjusting the time. The original (broken) setting lever spring does not reveal any modifications. The force required to pull on the crown is formidable; does not seem to be correct. I've added grease without any change in the performance.  Help!

 

John

IMG_0061.JPG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
    • That Island looks pretty good on the pics I found. Must be nice to live there. Welcome! Are there many watchmakers over there?
    • I believe so. I thought about it the last time.
    • Could you fit a sapphire crystal? My 'daily wearer' Breitling Aerospace is 22 years old and there isn't a mark on the sapphire crystal.  
    • Oh that's neat. I typically use a thin strap of rodico laid over the pallet fork to affix it to the upper plate but it can be hard to retrieve sometimes. And as I did more research, I may have just found your own earlier explanation: https://learntimeonline.com/forums/topic/potence-clip-for-full-plate-p-ws/
×
×
  • Create New...