Jump to content

Accutron woes after a string of good luck


Recommended Posts

After servicing about six with minimal issues, I have run across a couple that stump me.

I think I mentioned one before that seemed electrically sound but did not hum.  I have another.

All components check to the extent that I have measured them (cannot measure transistor Beta).

When measured on the test set, I get a little over 25uA.  This is about right if the unit is not oscillating.  1.5V and a 2.2M bias resistor with a beta of 50 would get in the ball park of 20uA.  A little more beta and you are north of 25uA.  This further confirms that the circuitry is functioning.  The cap measures about right.  I do not believe its value is too critical anyway.  It mostly serves as dc blocking and not establishing resonance.

I tried another tuning fork and...no luck.  I am going to drive this one to the end so that I can understand root cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Thank you for your persistence. I'm sure you'll solve it in the end.

Just out of curiosity, when you measure the coils, are you measuring DC resistance or AC inductance? 

Is this the 218 or 214 circuit?

dc resistance.  I believe that the ac impedance will be intrinsic to the physical structure of the coil.  I do have the tools to measure inductance but don't believe it is necessary.

Since my post, I powered the unit and monitored the base and collector with an oscilloscope while "pinging" one tine of the fork.  I got a very nice sinusoidal envelope and it died away.  Then I removed power and did the same thing.  Nothing.  This leads me to believe that the gain of the transistor (beta/hfe) is too low.  Just a theory at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the three 218s I've serviced, the one that behaved like you describe was weak magnets on the fork. If you replaced the fork, probably not your issue.

Two of the other non-runners were a 218 and 219, and both sets of resistors and caps were out of spec. Soldering in new ones fixed the problem in both cases.

Not as scientific, but my anecdotal results so far. I'm a computer programmer, not an EE 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ManSkirtBrew said:

Of the three 218s I've serviced, the one that behaved like you describe was weak magnets on the fork. If you replaced the fork, probably not your issue.

Two of the other non-runners were a 218 and 219, and both sets of resistors and caps were out of spec. Soldering in new ones fixed the problem in both cases.

Not as scientific, but my anecdotal results so far. I'm a computer programmer, not an EE 🙂

Very interesting.  I would posit that increasing the magnetism is roughly equivalent to increasing the transistor gain, so in that sense, your results are the same as mine.  Indeed mine is a 218 (sorry I forgot to mention earlier).  Similarly, the resistor can have the effect of a low gain transistor (not in the same way).  Transistor beta is a function of collector current, so a resistor going higher lowers the quiescent collector current and thus reduces gain.  But, I would think the resistor would have to be way out of spec...dunno.

I am impressed with your soldering skills.  I have the same iron as you, but perhaps a different tip.

I did a little research on small transistor packages and so far all I have found is SOT23 type.  I managed to solder one in (another case) but it was crowded.

Another thing I did was to fool around with some tiny compasses and several forks to see if I could measure a difference in their magnetism.  Sketchy results.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I could measure a difference in their magnetism. 

I believe they make newfangled electronic devices that could measure magnetic fields but they're probably expensive. In the absence of that you can make your own if you had a linear Hall effect sensor. The last time I needed to understand what a magnet was doing I just got myself a linear Hall effect sensor and made by own magnetic linear meter it worked quite nicely.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Occam's Razor strikes again.

It appears that the problem was purely mechanical. 

The hack lever in some instances can ride up the fulcrum pin.  When it does, it can hit the fork ever so slightly.  The train bridge will hold it down somewhat, but I don't believe it is always snug.

Also, I have observed different washers.  Sometimes two gold, sometimes gold and silver.  I always to put it back the way it came.  In this instance, I think the wrong washer was in place...the interior one.  So all this worked together to stop oscillation.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Good job.

Sooo.... when are you going to start on a 214?

I would like to hear about your experience. And count the number of expletives you had to use. 😉

 

I still have a bunch of these 218s to finish. Then I will read the book, "Cuss Words for Watchmakers"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I still have a bunch of these 218s to finish. Then I will read the book, "Cuss Words for Watchmakers"

Is that the International version or Texan version?

Many years back I met a group of Texan oilmen who were staying in the same hotel. And we seemed to bump into them everywhere we went. Didn't understand half the things they said, it was like a foreign dialect. My New Yorker friend who was with me didn't fair much better.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the advice.  Actually I have already ordered a replacement one as soon as I broke the setting lever screw.  It is supposed to arrive today or tomorrow, I got it from AliExpress for $27.51. In the meantime this Sunday I got from amazon the cheapest mechanical watch I could find (a pocket watch with a 2650G movement).  That movement is now sitting disassembled and waiting for reassembly.  I have to say I found that movement pretty ugly compared to the ST36.  The fact that it is skeletonized and center second made it interesting but all the bridges feel very bad quality. One thing which happened with this one (due to the skeleton nature) is that I had trouble removing the hands with my presto tool (I have levers on order but not arrived yet).  I bent a bit the little retainer (the part at the bottom of the picture).  Then later on I couldn't find the cannon pinion.  I finally found it it was in the hour wheel.  I must have pulled it out a bit initially and then oil kept it in there. The other thing which happened is that when I tried to open the case back which the back crystal (plastic, glued) came out.       Anyway tonight is reassembly time for this one. I also have an NH35 and a Mingzu 2813 on order. One question:  I was thinking about getting some old soviet movements which I see on ebay for pretty cheap.  All that to keep practicing and hopefully learn not to break anything before I start trying to service a real watch.
    • The ST36 isn't an expensive movement, so it might be easier to just get a replacement for parts. Here's a listing in the U.S. for $33 + $3 shipping. Once you get current movement running you can tackle the tangles hairspring without the pressure of making it worse.   https://www.ebay.com/itm/353824212893?itmmeta=01HYDN4TGZSXFCW4TXZ2THH0C1&hash=item526191079d:g:sT4AAOSwHidhcQO6&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA8Jw5K76smZgFGzM5ubLY769v%2B6EbBphCYo99M48gxLxxMjir9tRyn32O8Q5AgmKh1aKUP%2FfaCOIz8a7YMGkflhGWus7BDQIzrs45yo8NCZ66Jmti1Qli2%2BjaAm%2F8Ogg81F17LdC5Ulu54cnXSOCtaMkQcp03pcluBqTAuZPxbYwkrOC38sb%2FtlDewlZBOhjtA7pZTTMAql7hFKbrkc5RyF%2BtGL2%2Br9BS7mzgd%2BxdDF08HcVn6rvOawDjEbMPs9mYSegv6DVnSoiYYpMGzPJE7Qyd782Brjl05GQTL9MzpFuWrQvUTNxyY5%2BNQi18XTmf4A%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8yok7XzYw
    • It appears to me that you have overlapped the hairspring.  Hard to say for sure with the pictures you provide.  If so, it is one of the easiest hairspring fixes.  You will have to remove it from the balance cock and the balance wheel to do it right.  There are videos that show how this is done.  Off hand I dont recall where they are. Having said this, preforming this repair is advanced work.  Put it aside and come back to it in six months to a year.  Otherwise, you might make it worse.
    • OK thank you a just want say thank you  to everyone who replieded me on this web page when I needed help on this watchrepairtalk have learned so much even with the pallet adjustment a can do it now all thanks to you all been a very great help God bless you all.
×
×
  • Create New...