Jump to content

Are these synthetic rubies? (FHF 97)


Recommended Posts

Hello, are these going train stones synthetic rubies, or is it some different material? I hope the difference from the traditional balance wheel jewel is visible enough on the photo. My main concern is, can I clean bridges with these "jewels" in normal cleaning fluids?

20240205_211845.jpg

All right, so if I can assume from the photos I found online, synthetic rubies are translucent, while these are not. What are they, then? To my unexperienced eye, they look more like a red plastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Are you sure they are rubies? can be plastic bushings.

I am not. Sorry, English is not my native language and I used "rubies" in more generic meaning, like "bearings". All right, so plastic bushings they are, probably. The point is the writing on a bridge says "15 jewels", so I did not expect plastic bushings where jewels should be. 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Martin.  I looked very closely at your pictures.  That is very strange.  I have seen many strange things inside watches, but I have not seen bearings like those before.  I own a watch with an FHF 97 in it, and the rubies did not look like those.

I am forced to wonder if an amateur repair person replaced all those bearing with red plastic.  Those movements would not be made that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at your balance jewels that's what the jewels should look like.

If there plastic they should be soft enough to be scratched with steel like corner of a screwdriver tip. Then if it does scratch like plastic I'd keep it out of the cleaning fluid as you have no idea what kind of plastic it is.

Then the Swiss do have another form of synthetic Ruby called Polyruby. As far as I know the only place you find this is in pallet forks I don't think I've ever seen or heard of it being used as a bearing jewel.  on pallet forks you recognize it as pink colored stones that are not transparent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I am forced to wonder if an amateur repair person replaced all those bearing with red plastic.  Those movements would not be made that way.

Hi Karl, I believe I am the first owner of the movement. I bought it (just the movement, there was no watch) as a part of watchmaking lessons kit from certain semi-online watchmaking school, 15-20 years ago, not sure. Never touched it until recently, though. So it is probably a "study" or "practice" version of the movement, where jewels were replaced with plastic bushings for the sake of cost-cutting. Still, I find it ridiculous - how am I supposed to learn inspecting the jewels here? 🙂

9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

If there plastic they should be soft enough to be scratched with steel like corner of a screwdriver tip. Then if it does scratch like plastic 

Thanks John. I tried to scratch it and it scratches very easily, just like plastic, so it is probably safe to assume it IS plastic, much as I refused to believe it first.

Edited by MartinOfPrague
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Never seen that but yes very practical Hector 
    • Welcome, Simeon! I'm into Soviet watches too (not the political system, and yes, I am able to make the distinction, unlike some). They offer amazing value for money. I like your "Big Zero" profile image. It's a true classic and I have one of those myself. I noticed that the hands aren't the original. Not that it matters a lot but here's an interesting article about the Big Zero if you haven't already seen it.
    • I was thinking will the gasket stretch at all to match the desired size.  Did i also deduce that the original gasket is thinner (0 .5mm ) than the cousins gasket ( 0.8mm )  could that just be an effect of you measuring the case for the gasket size  H  ?
    • if we look at and understand why steel becomes magnetised and unmagnetised then its possible to work out why some devices are better than others. Simpy it is a parallel alignment of atoms , electrons within a material caused by external magnetic fields. Different magnetic fields cause different alignments and non alignment of atoms. Fields by AC currents are changing atom direction approx 50 times per second ( 50hz ). As a material is drawn away from a demagging device the field is becoming progressively weaker while also changing the material's atom direction having the effect of returning their random directions ( demagnetising ) . To improve on this demagetising effect, try changing the material's orientation as it is drawn away.  Fields caused by DC currents have the most permanent magnetising effect as the currect is flowing one way only. A good demagger would produce random magnet fields and disorientation of the material's atoms.  
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.  
×
×
  • Create New...