Jump to content

Urema Esslingen with a wiring problem


Recommended Posts

I recently bought a very old cleaning machine, and as expected the wiring was in a very poor state. It was fitted with a plunger switch which kept sticking, an obsolete plug, a two-core cable and all the internal wiring had crumbling insulation. Nevertheless, when the switch cooperated, the motor would run. I decided to replace as much of the wiring as possible, fit a new toggle switch, and add an earth connection to the casing. I have completed all the work, but when I flick the switch, the motor doesn't run and just emits a buzzing tone. I can turn the spindle by hand, so it isn't a mechanical blockage. My best guess is that the motor is OK but I have made a mistake with the connections. Does anyone have any tips what I should check? Here are some photos of the motor for those who understand these things.

Thanks in advance!

 

DSC03594.JPG

DSC03602.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the motor have a starting capacitor? If it has one, check if the capacitance is within specs. A weak capacitor is unable to spin up the motor.

Also, check that the rotor is centred properly. If the rotor is off-centered, or if the housing is not securely tightened, the imbalance in the magnetic field can pull the rotor against the stator and cause it to seize and hum.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2023 at 3:07 PM, HectorLooi said:

Does the motor have a starting capacitor?

No, it's a very simple shaded pole motor, as far as I can make out, but then I know next to nothing about electrical devices. This type of motor seems to produce very low starting torque which fits well to the problem I'm seeing. The stator is a really close fit into the housing, so no adjustment there. There are two opposing pointed grub screws which locate the stator, but tightening them doesn't move the stator within the housing any appreciable amount. The points just dig deeper into the laminations. The rotor bearings are a close fit into machined cups into the housing. No adjustment there either.

I removed the rotor and checked again for any possibility of fouling, then reassembled, and it is trying so hard to run! The spindle will make several slow revolutions, then stall. It seems to be freeing up slightly with each new attempt though. My grease-monkey brain is saying either the voltage in the coils is too low, or the friction in the bearings is too high.

I wanted to change the roller bearings, as I thought the were too noisy and a bit sloppy, but they are EXTREMELY tight on the spindle. I gave up and just added more grease. I don't think so, but possibly I have damaged the bearings, or the bit of extra grease is dragging too much. As I say, with each attempt, the rpm is a bit higher at first, but then it dies off and stalls. I'm guessing when the windings are cold, the resistance is lowest, and so the motor turns until the coil warms up a bit. Failing any better suggestions I will flush out the grease and add some light oil.

The other possibility is that the new switch I fitted is robbing voltage somehow. Maybe it's the wrong rating or it was damaged by my soldering to the terminals? This is the switch:

Screenshot2023-12-04201615.png.9c939ecc5ae04ce37e53bb06c19f702d.png

Contact resistance < 20 mOhm.

Or, I have damaged a part of the windings, or my soldering is not good enough???? I cannot smell anything burning or giving off fumes, and nothing seems to get hot either.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Kalanag said:

Is it this type of motor?

Yes, exactly. At least, that shows the motor housing from an identical machine.

10 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I suggest you remove the earth ground that you added and see what happens.

I will try this tomorrow.

10 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Check that the welds of the copper shaded loops are still intact.

Not sure what to look for here, but I will check for anything wich appears loose or broken, and post pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Not sure what to look for here, but I will check for anything wich appears loose or broken, and post pictures.

There should be welded copper loops in the stator slots like shown in the pic.

IMG_5444.jpeg.83afaa96302332e3a7491dceefa69f7d.jpeg

Edited by Kalanag
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem solved! In my attempts to remove the roller bearings I had displaced one of them very slightly (about 0.5mm) and they were binding a little when I closed the housing up tight. I reseated it firmly. Now everything is running very freely, and the motor has no problem getting up to speed. The bearings are noisy, so I think a replacement is due at some stage, but I'm just happy to have the machine running for the time being. Now to find out if it actually cleans watch parts!

Many thanks to all those who tried to help so far. If anyone has any more questions about the machine or wants to add their own knowledge, please feel free to continue the topic.

Edited by Klassiker
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

Problem solved! In my attempts to remove the roller bearings I had displaced one of them very slightly (about 0.5mm) and they were binding a little when I closed the housing up tight. I reseated it firmly. Now everything is running very freely, and the motor has no problem getting up to speed. The bearings are noisy, so I think a replacement is due at some stage, but I'm just happy to have the machine running for the time being. Now to find out if it actually cleans watch parts!

Many thanks to all those who tried to help so far. If anyone has any more questions about the machine or wants to add their own knowledge, please feel free to continue the topic.

Lol...Occam's Razor.  Good job!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think maybe we're all a bit dim @ManSkirtBrew 🤣 99% of the time I'm working with the 0.5X Barlow, so mags from 3.5X to 22.5X. When I need a close up of a pivot or jewel, I take the Barlow out, and even put in the 2X Barlow, but it's a nuisance. So like you, I had that D'oh moment, why don't I just use 20X eyepieces (WF20X/10). They take seconds to change, and you keep the working distance. The only downsides are lower field of view, and less brightness.  
    • At the lowest magnification, I can just get all of a normal wristwatch size movement in field. For some things it's too much magnification, but the nice thing about the eyepieces is they only take seconds to swap in and out. I'm genuinely surprised I've never read about anyone else doing it, to be honest.
    • I've attached two photographs - the watch case looks like it needs the crown to extend into the case to pick up the stem if that makes sense
    • The K&D (Levin made the same style too, probably others as well) are a clever design and work well when you get used to them. The only issue is if you wind the spring so that the tongue goes in, there's a really good chance it slips futher and then comes out  the next slot, usually breaking off. Best to size it so you can fit it in the barrel with the tongue sticking out.
    • I guess that's me... I work with various pumps, motors, sensors, computers, PCBs, and lots of code and chemistry. Couldn't tell you much about life with a mechatronics degree, as I've never heard the term before. My degree is in Entrepreneurship, and I bootstrapped all the technical stuff (my superpower). On the face of it, it sounds like mechatronics is the better way to go between the two, but it seems hard to imagine a mech E degree without a lot of code and electronics these days...   Whatever happened with his CS project, btw?
×
×
  • Create New...