Jump to content

Seiko Presage SRPG23 - real or fake?


Recommended Posts

My brother in law asked me to service a Seiko Presage that he picked up (for too much) at a pawn shop. It came with no box, papers, anything. That's red flag number one.

He wants to swap the crystal out for sapphire, and while removing the old crystal it just popped straight on out, no glue. Red flag number two.

The rotor bearing is loose as hell and needs replacing, but the rotor itself is not gold as I'd have expected, and signed 4R35a Twenty Four jewels. My understanding is the 4R35 is a 23 jewel movement, so it appears this is a fake rotor? Red flag three.

Lastly, the back of the dial is plain brass, I would have thought an OEM seiko dial would have the year of manufacture written on it, or some other identifying information? Red flag four.

It otherwise looks to be the real deal, the crown, case, caseback and bracelet seems legit, and while I don't have another SRPG23 to compare to, the dial looks nice.

Is there anything else I can be checking? My spidey sense is off the charts that this is an Ali-X fabrication with an NH35 movement in it, hence the jewel count on the rotor.

Here's the rotor:

IMG_20231028_123141.thumb.jpg.e513f5652a3e098a57161faa20c4ee18.jpg

 

Here's the crystal exactly as it looked removed from the case.

IMG_20231028_123136.thumb.jpg.1a710643b6be108a93ccd29b002b9dd3.jpg

 

Here's the back of the dial.

IMG_20231028_123129.thumb.jpg.0fcd14dea20a6db30eafc0fa80f925a4.jpg

Edited by lexacat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4R35A has 23 jewels.  The rotor is definitely wrong.  I haven't taken the dials off of any of the newer models, so I can't comment on that, but I would think at least they would put their manufacturing date codes on there like they did on all of the older models I've worked on.  I couldn't say for sure though.  I've done a couple Hardlex to sapphire upgrades, including some on newer watches (most recently an Alpinist), and each one of them had a crystal gasket (nylon/plastic type).

Edited by thor447
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Thor, turns out there was a much easier way to confirm it's a fake.

Serial number is 813124, which popped up on another forum:

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/seiko-presage-sprb46j1-authenticity.5260007/

 

So yeah, 100% a fake watch. Bummer!

The crystal glue/gasket situation, from my research the old hardlex should have been glued in and essentially is a massive PITA to remove. According to the guy that sells the only box shaped sapphires I can find on the internet, the new sapphire needs to be glued in.

I've got all the parts, and the watch is disassembled, so I'm still going to service and repair it, but how unfortunate!

Glad it's not my money though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No idea Rich, but for your own sake please avoid inhaling the fumes.
    • I would try the vapour treatment very simple just a simmering pot of the stuff and jewels bluetacked ( not whitetacked this time, you still haven't said if I'm forgiven yet 🙂 ) to the underside of the lid. You're now gonna tell me that stearic acid can be highly explosive above 90° C 🤣
    • I guess it also depends on the precision and quality of the watch. He works on vintage watches mainly and surface treatments on 50 - 60 year old watches probably isn't going to make much difference. I read about nano coatings for car finishes. The article claims that nano coatings can reduced the coefficient of drag by 5%. Is that number significant? I don't know. Maybe if you were trying to break the land speed record. But applying that on a 50 year old clunker isn't going to make it go any faster, accelerate better or save on petrol. 🤣
    • 😅 yep certainly overdid it , i wasn't sure if i had enough heat so i went out and left it cooking. You can see the thick frosting, bit like my cherry buns.
    • 5 hours! You have slow cooked it! It must be really tender by now. @nickelsilver posted about his Greiner machine a while back. It had a heated chamber of stearic acid to epilame jewels and it only took 60 seconds. I've tried stearic acid dissolved in ethanol with a flake of shellac. I'm not really convinced by my test results. I conducted a side by side test by coating a mirror with a stripe of stearic acid and putting several drops of 9010 on the treated surface and untreated surface and observed it for several days. The 9010 spread out about the same for both the treated and untreated surfaces. I spoke with my mentor recently regarding epilame and lubricating pallet jewels. He has stopped doing both because he finds no significant improvements to the end result.
×
×
  • Create New...