Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi folks, I am looking at buying a watch which has never been used however it's battery needs to be replaced. My concern is if I buy it and find the battery is leaked I will have to buy a new movement for it probably. The watch has a sticker that says mercury free, does this decreases the risk of having a leaked battery? Thanks

Posted

There is always a chance that the battery can leak.

If the seller is not willing to open the watch and show the insides or if the seller is not willing to fit in a new battery and test it, walk away. 

Unless the price is significantly less than a new movement and the service charge to replace the movement. 

Posted
2 hours ago, HK1 said:

mercury free, does this decreases the risk of having a leaked battery? Thanks

wishful thinking if you think Mercury free batteries don't leak. In other words typically silver cells although somebody could stick a hearing aid battery in which would not be desirable. Sooner or later if you leave the battery in the watch there is the likelihood that it can leak. It depends on who made the battery when it was made in probably a whole bunch of other factors. But eventually when the battery gets through consuming its internal components if it still has enough whatever it can eat right through the case and then you get corrosion all over everything. Typically the batteries are very alkaline I believe sodium or potassium hydroxide and they really quite destructive. Which is why if you have a battery-powered watch in not using it for an extended period of time it's usually best to remove the battery to prevent damage.

Posted

Renata claim that their batteries have a better seal and do not leak. On another forum, members say that Energizer batteries are better than Renata.

But from my personal experience, both these brands leak.

Some claim that the ones that leak are fakes from China.

Renata has a factory in China.

Sooo.... I'll let you make up your mind.

Posted

I used Renata, but according to the following article, they don't do well for leak resistance. I now use Energiser.

https://www.great-british-watch.co.uk/how-to-spot-and-deal-with-watch-battery-leaks/

"A combined survey was undertaken to assess the issue of watch battery leaks. The outcome of the survey comes from the evaluation of over 3000 watches where the battery had expired. The results derive from a mix of sources from both North America and Europe including independent watch repair centres, official branded workshops and solo enterprises. The variety of watches tested covers the full-range of prices and brands that occupy the majority of the market segments."

Battery Leak Resistance

image.png.2daae607a3a0f6125182fda9046de17c.png

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...