Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently purchased a brand-spanking new Sherline lathe, which has the ability to cut threads.  However, I am still unsure of how the stem tap measurements work.  Some websites say that the tap is proportional to the thread diameter (larger diameter = larger tap).  Some websites say that the tap is inversely proportional to the thread diameter (larger diameter = smaller tap).

Then there is the issue of what the actual thread pitch of the stem is.  Assuming the simple approach of tap being proportional to diameter, what is the thread pitch or TPI of these tap numbers?  I've read that it closely resembles the Bourgeaux thread series.  But I can't get a straightforward answer of what exactly the Bourgeaux thread series is.  Different websites report different numbers.  I can't find an authoritative source to get the actual numbers.

Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That defo warrants a photo Greg, what on earth were you thinking ? That you could get away without one 🤨

Because I purchased it so recently that it hasn't even shipped from Sherline yet. 🙂

Posted

Hi John, that was one of the websites I found before making this post.  I bought the inch version of the lathe, but you can still cut metrics threads.  The instruction manual for the thread cutting attachment includes the gear setup for cutting metric threads on an inch lathe and vice versa.

Posted
9 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Here is the table for  Bourgeaux thread series.

https://www.sizes.com/tools/thread_bourgeaux.htm

 

Thanks hippy.  That was one of the websites I was referring to when I mentioned that different websites report different numbers. 

Mainly

https://www.sizes.com/tools/thread_bourgeaux.htm

and 

https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~alanb/martin.html

The sizes.com also has a page on the Latard series, and gives a reference to a nearly 100 year old German book.  So at least it's something to go by.  But there are no such references for the Bourgeaux thread.

Then there's also this book (p69 and p70) which reports that Bourgeaux had a pitch of 0.94^n or 0.9^n, neither of which conform to those two websites.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Randall-Brooks/publication/233455494_Standard_Screw_Threads_For_Scientific_Instruments_Part_I_Production_Techniques_And_The_Filiere_Suisse/links/568c0ec708ae153299b63b04/Standard-Screw-Threads-For-Scientific-Instruments-Part-I-Production-Techniques-And-The-Filiere-Suisse.pdf

However, this whole point is moot if there is a place that can give the exact dimensions of current stem threads.

Posted
13 hours ago, GregG said:

this whole point is moot if there is a place that can give the exact dimensions of current stem threads

The problem with looking for certain specifications is the specifications only exist if someone is trying to make that item typically. The problem becomes finding the specifications become problematic if nobody's actually making stems and him.

Then at one time they used to make a set for re-tapping the crown. The that a holder for the crown a drill and a tap and it was made by star and that's all the information you get the sizes are intent's of a millimeter. But it doesn't say give the guy information you're looking for as I didn't assume you be using it to try to make a stem.

There is a couple links you might have missed perhaps

https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/watch-stem-threads-made-on-sherline.157058/

I think this one covers the same stuff you have but to put it here anyway

https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/watch-stem-tap-sizes.124651/

I think probably what you're going to have to do is get stems of the size you like to make and imitate the threads that you find on them.

 

Posted

For modern (last 100 years) non-U.S. stuff it's metric. You can find the thread pitches here for each diameter. Don't worry about how metric (sort of) corresponds to Martin threads, especially if you will be cutting them on a lathe.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/28/2023 at 12:15 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

That defo warrants a photo Greg, what on earth were you thinking ? That you could get away without one 🤨

As promised.

IMG_20230812_133550.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I went with the CNC-ready package, so I had to supply my own motors. I've written a rudimentary "CNC" program in Python that takes an SVG outline of a balance staff that I create and moves the motors to cut accordingly.  But I haven't stitched all the pieces together yet.

They are also closed loop stepper motors, meaning they have an internal feedback mechanism to accurately control the position.

Edited by GregG
  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Are you sure its big enough to make a watch stem. 🤣

On a somewhat related note, I found a video about the American Precision Museum, and they had one of the machines used to make watch screws (at 48 seconds if it doesn't automatically jump to that point).

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GregG said:

On a somewhat related note, I found a video about the American Precision Museum, and they had one of the machines used to make watch screws (at 48 seconds if it doesn't automatically jump to that point).

 

 

I believe this is an identical machine in action, amazing for 1870s!

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

 

I believe this is an identical machine in action, amazing for 1870s!

 

 

 

I think the video you linked to is the video that is playing on the iPad in the museum video. XD

Edited by GregG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My profile photo is age 20, last century, but I still look exactly the same so I'm not sure it counts ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • I sure appreciate your comment! I will look into one of those or maybe something similar. I of course will check your video to have a better idea.  by the way, that’s a beautiful lathe! Mine is a little peersless, but I just bought a Boley & Leinen that is on its way. That’s the one I am looking a motor for. It comes with a motor, but I want to replace it for  one that has a speed controller.
    • Indeed. I would not attempt one. Here is my messy Sherline setup
    • Hello everyone my name is Tom and I and I am new to the forum and new to the hobby. I have always had an interest in mechanical watches and finally decided to pursue it. I’m going thru online trading and have purchased the basic tools to set up a work area. I’m really looking forward to learning and thank you in advance for all of your knowledge!
    • This conversation is becoming a very confusing. The etachron system is a very nice system for manufacturing watches. As you know it consists of two components the stud and the regulator pins. Beautiful thing of this system is you can open up your regulator pins center the hairspring and as you close the pins they will close equally on both sides providing you centered it in the first place. It's not like you're going to become closer to one side or the other as the definition of the regulator pins is a bit confusing it's not exactly a slot sort of. I'm thinking maybe a little eight reading will be helpful for you. Then the file name was changed by me at the US patent but the wording of Seiko may or may not actually be attached to it soared up? I just did that so I can find it in my files. Normally patents are in people's name if they work for a company the company name will be there you'll notice the person lives in Japan which is interesting as the name would imply that this is a Swiss product. Somewhere I think I have the patents for the stud and I believe that is Swiss like a lot of things their Japanese and Swiss and then the Japanese let the Swiss name stand as it seems you more popular in case as you read up on the patents of the regulator pins or pin will see and it should explain exactly how and why it works also why it's important to always close at an open in specific directions because the pins actually have a shaped to them it's very hard to see the shape as it's very tiny.   As a reminder with this system it's mass-produced. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they use cameras and computers to do all of the adjustments.  The meaning of this is that the majority of watches will function as there supposed to and do what they're supposed to do the system will allow us for some minor in tolerance and has more than likely as I said no human hand is ever touched those watches that's the way they left the factory and they work fine. US2007091729A1 seiko etachron.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...