Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It has a very light plastic case with mineral glass, the engine room is almost empty, and the model is also non-existent. Unfortunately, I can't find the instructions anymore, not even the model itself. Brand: Majestic made in Germany. I completely disassembled the part, I don't remember why, but now I put a battery in and I'm trying to adjust it. First you have to push in the crown, then the watch runs quickly, to 12 digits and waits until it receives the signal and adjusts itself. Hour is set with the crown pulled, the hour hand always jumps one hour further, mechanically! (It wasn't right at first, then I compensated for the wrong values and then it worked, later it also worked with setting it to 12.) Can someone tell me more about the watch and the technology? The battery cover grips the crown with one arm and serves as a contact switch. Actually, it's all very spartan and technically impressively simple, I wonder which crazy engineer designed it all to let this model appear on the market for a short time.

---------------------------------

Then it occurs to me that there are only a few digital radio-controlled clocks, most of them have hands. So I wonder why that is.

--------------------------------

And the market is flooded with cheap jewelless watches, most with some standard movement. The question is how long do watches without jewels or with a jewel on this spindle with the magnet, the jewel sits where the flywheel/magnet sits.

2023-07-17-112036.jpg

2023-07-17-111939.jpg

Edited by Fischgott
Posted

I can't tell you much about the movement, but my best friend works at NIST where the signal it uses to set itself comes from. He just designed/made/installed a new FPGA based server for that signal, and will be moving all the servers to his equipment in the near future. If you have something that uses the atomic clock signal, it goes through his equipment.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Nice detail, thank you, but this is not the source of my signal, mine is dcf 🙂 because my watch residents in Germany. See the locations worldwide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_clock My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

And i discovered that casio has also G-Shock radio watches, and some unknown vendors have digital radio watches too, but i think they are all together overlooked somehow in my opinion. Casios watches can even process the signal from different stations worldwide. You dont have to adjust your watch every now and then, and the summer and winter time is also set for you by the signal.

Found this link: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/pc-funkuhren/ very interesting. Looked up the letters on the pcb. Dont remember the internals exactly but this could be it: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/funkuhr-und-steuermodule/ And the hours are set through metal disks and springs and a very unique lever.

Edited by Fischgott
Posted
1 hour ago, Fischgott said:

My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

DCF77 sends the complete info every minute.

Frank

Posted

One of the problems with the all the clocks and/or watches that receive digital time signals is the problem of getting a nice clean reception.  Then the next amusements for me is what do they do if they don't get a nice clean signal?

5 hours ago, Fischgott said:

My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

What you typically find with these items is they do not try to receive continuously. Running the receiver continuously consumes a lot of power and watches typically don't have a lot of power. So usually what they do is they will attempt to synchronize from time to time like every 24 hours typically sometime after midnight when there's less interference. Even initially when you're setting the time on them or their trying to set the time they might ask you just give up for a while and then try later if they can't get a signal which means of course that your watch isn't on time.

Here's a link to the US transmitter.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-distribution/radio-station-wwvb

 

 

 

Posted

I read up that within 2 minutes the watch should get the signal, i talk about a watch without time waiting for signal. Very interesting video: Amplify signal by hanging the watch over a metal tube: 

 

The perfect atomic wristwatch would be the F91W without any buttons. Always 24h mode, time in second, day of the week, day plus month, no other function. Thats it. There are only very big atomic digital watches out there, but very small atomic analoge watches. I cant get why. Also i prefer flexible stretch wristbands.

I also cant get why a watch has to be big, because its ugly, it gets in the way, its unkomfortabel, it clings everywhere. And then the "luxury" watches, watches for thousands of dollars with obsolete technology from before 100 years with a brandname. Is it because ones ego thinks: whooo im special

I also dont like the fitness features, its a waste of time, unless you are a maniac who destroys his body professionally.

Also the signal should be used as an emergency alert, so everybody gets awake in the night in case of a disaster.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Here is the front, made in Germany, i disassembled it completely, struggled to put it back together, runs fine, battery lasts very long. I figured out that spraying silicon spray into it makes quartz watch movements have longer battery life. Plus thick oil on the back where i can reach the bearings, and grease on lid and crown (waterseal). I have an osco quartz watch, put brake cleaner in it, gave it a brutal shake, then dried it quickly with compressed air and did the silicon lubrication thing. This runs endless on a very little AG4 Battery and its very accurate. Most will say im insane, but these are the facts.

IMG_20250401_013112.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My profile photo is age 20, last century, but I still look exactly the same so I'm not sure it counts ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • I sure appreciate your comment! I will look into one of those or maybe something similar. I of course will check your video to have a better idea.  by the way, that’s a beautiful lathe! Mine is a little peersless, but I just bought a Boley & Leinen that is on its way. That’s the one I am looking a motor for. It comes with a motor, but I want to replace it for  one that has a speed controller.
    • Indeed. I would not attempt one. Here is my messy Sherline setup
    • Hello everyone my name is Tom and I and I am new to the forum and new to the hobby. I have always had an interest in mechanical watches and finally decided to pursue it. I’m going thru online trading and have purchased the basic tools to set up a work area. I’m really looking forward to learning and thank you in advance for all of your knowledge!
    • This conversation is becoming a very confusing. The etachron system is a very nice system for manufacturing watches. As you know it consists of two components the stud and the regulator pins. Beautiful thing of this system is you can open up your regulator pins center the hairspring and as you close the pins they will close equally on both sides providing you centered it in the first place. It's not like you're going to become closer to one side or the other as the definition of the regulator pins is a bit confusing it's not exactly a slot sort of. I'm thinking maybe a little eight reading will be helpful for you. Then the file name was changed by me at the US patent but the wording of Seiko may or may not actually be attached to it soared up? I just did that so I can find it in my files. Normally patents are in people's name if they work for a company the company name will be there you'll notice the person lives in Japan which is interesting as the name would imply that this is a Swiss product. Somewhere I think I have the patents for the stud and I believe that is Swiss like a lot of things their Japanese and Swiss and then the Japanese let the Swiss name stand as it seems you more popular in case as you read up on the patents of the regulator pins or pin will see and it should explain exactly how and why it works also why it's important to always close at an open in specific directions because the pins actually have a shaped to them it's very hard to see the shape as it's very tiny.   As a reminder with this system it's mass-produced. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they use cameras and computers to do all of the adjustments.  The meaning of this is that the majority of watches will function as there supposed to and do what they're supposed to do the system will allow us for some minor in tolerance and has more than likely as I said no human hand is ever touched those watches that's the way they left the factory and they work fine. US2007091729A1 seiko etachron.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...