Jump to content

Identifying a movement?


Martyn58

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! My first post so please bear with me if I do something ‘wrong’.

I’ve been asked to have a look at my father in law’s Westminster chimes mantle clock which hasn’t been run for some decades. 
 

Can anyone help me identify the movement? Maker?

 

Thanks in advance!!

 

Martyn

IMG_0534.jpeg

IMG_0535.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant see the whole of the stamp by the number 12 bottom right, I can only see Made in, so can you tell me? A stab in the dark if it is made in England then as the barrels are detachable I would say it could be a Garrard. Is there any I D on the dial? What is the case like?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Is there any I D on the dial? What is the case like?

Thanks for the reply. There’s no id on the dial. I’ll upload a photo. I’m in the UK so English might be the most likely origin. I don’t see the ‘Made in …’ stamp that you’re seeing so I’ll take a close up photo in the morning and upload it. 

IMG_0516.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha Ha Ha it must of been me seeing things that are not there, that's old age for you. The case is in the design as what is know as a napoleon hat. The clock hands are in the style called serpentine. Now I have spent more time looking at the movement I think it is German, so it was made before the WW2 I would date this to be around the the late 1920's to middle 1930's 

What do you intend to do? Are you thinking of taking the movement apart and cleaning it. It is complicated if its your first repair. You need to start on a timepiece or at least a strike.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

What do you intend to do?

Good morning! Thanks for the info. Well, for sure it needs disassembly and cleaning … parts have far too much oil and it’s grimy. I’m able to do a basic service of an Enfield strike … all except removing the mainsprings. I’ve also ‘learned’ the ETA 6497 pocket watch movement and a Seiko NH35 … so it’s not exactly my first project. But I’m anxious. That’s why I was hoping to find some information. 
 

I think my main worry is : might there be particular alignment of parts to ensure correct quarters chiming?  Or can the mechanism sort itself out?  
 

And you’ve prompted another question : are you saying that the barrels can be removed without separating the plates?

 

With all the other movements that I ‘worked on’ before I had a duplicate donor movement for reference, and YT videos. With this I have nothing so it’s a bit daunting. 
 

Thanks in advance for your time, and to anyone else who pitches in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes all three barrels can be removed with out taking the movement apart, make sure you let all three springs down first. The train on the strike side and chime side have to all be it the correct position to work properly.  As you have knowledge of a Smith's Enfield strike, the strike on this movement will be much the same to you.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

As you have knowledge of a Smith's Enfield strike, the strike on this movement will be much the same to you.   

Thanks for the info re barrels … I’m waiting for file handles to arrive to make a dedicated letdown key. I’m also getting closer to making my own spring winder. Wws. 
I’m not a quick worker … I’m in no hurry … so will spend some time just observing the running movement before I do anything. I guess I’m also anxious about getting the plates back together with more than 15 mobiles inside … remembering my experience with a Smiths pocket watch which only has a handful 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi this clock will have the auto correct pawls on it which means that when the hands are set by hand the chimes get out of sync and re sync at the hour, these can be a pest to get right so suggest you read up on it as there are quite a few simultaneous actins take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2023 at 10:38 AM, oldhippy said:

make sure you let all three springs down first.

Barrels are fully let down … I’ll have a go at removing one tomorrow. But a rookie question about which clock plate to remove. On a Smiths it’s obvious but on this movement there are removable nuts on the under dial side. Removing those will allow the lugs ( for screwing movement into case ) to fall out of position. The back plate is held with screws. So nuts or screws?  Is there a convention as to which plate is lifted off?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose this fits "best" in this forum 😃 Im looking for some wall 'art' that doubles as a reference. Specifically Id like to find an ETA 28xx or Sellita exploded movement view. 2824/2836 would be ideal. Have any of you seen/found such a thing - there seem to be a lot of these for specialized movements, and none of them ready to print or to be had as a poster. Why help is appreciated.
    • The diameter is that of the ring - afaik, will have to look it up. “Wiggle room“ doesn‘t matter as long as the spring length is in the ball park.  Essential sizes of a mainspring are thickness, width and length. Diameter is just a hint if you can push into the barrel directly or will need a winder, it is no property of the spring. Frank
    • Hi @Zendoc, I guess you're like me and you don't have a mainspring winder.  I searched GR mainspring for the AS 1686 mainspring and I now understand your dilemma. The exact one is discontinued. To answer you question more directly, I see two good alternatives for you: a) GR4485 with 1.60 x .10 x 280 x 8.5 ( I guess this one is the one you found): https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/GR4485 OR b) GR4477 with 1.60 x .095 x 320 x 9. https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/mainsprings-by-list-watch-pocket/gr4477   As you know, the the AS 1686 spring is supposed to be 1.60 x .10 x 300 x 9. - both of the above will fit and you'll manage to insert them from the retention ring without need for a mainspring winder (provided you know how to do it). - GR4485 will give you more power (=higher amplitude), but less power reserve (due to shorter length) than the original. - GR4477 will give you the same power reserve as the original. However, a bit less power.   Personally, I'd take GR4477 for two reasons: 1. Well, the power reserve is better. 2. With modern lubricants and modern mainspring metal alloys, you tend to get a higher amplitude anyways. You'd maybe even end up with too much amplitude (knocking) if you go with the original size and use thin synthetic oils-- see discussion here: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/10580-omega-calt17-help/#comment-248101      
    • Your setup is correct. The smallest diameter of one pulley must correspond with the largest of the other one, else not speed variation. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...