Jump to content

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, rehajm said:

Okay veterans- the second time in a week I've come across these scratches on the bottom of the balance wheel arm. Others had these lines then an 'X' on the opposite arm. Anyone from this tribe that can translate the hieroglyphs? 

IMG_0144.thumb.jpeg.10e39c64a1d6261265399ade758f937b.jpeg

IMG_0051.jpeg

I guess some rather nasty way of poising the balance that had a heavy arm and then a correction .Only seen by another watchrepairer. Quick and effective but bodgy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the day movements were finished in batches, so certain parts would get marked to be sure they stay with their piece. A watchmaker might have a compartmented box with 5 or 10 divisions, with smaller divisions in each, for that number of movements. I've seen the markings on pieces that should be later than when things were done so artisanally, but I think in the final stages of finishing and timing in many companies they continued to work in batches. Well, many still do, but with workbenches that hold 50-100 movements on a chain drive actuated by a knee switch, that must be a nightmare job!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typically with vintage American pocket watches you will find the serial number on all of the Plate components so that they can stay together it's also scribed on the balance wheel so that will stay with the watch. On rare occasions I've seen the hour and minute wheel will have the last two digits of the serial number but that's been very rare.  This is because when they were manufacturing things are manufactured together versus today with the components to be manufactured separately and independent of the watch and then assembled at a later time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some watch makers would mark the balance if the hairspring was removed, this was done so when it was replaced it would be in the same spot so there would be no need for beat setting. It is a thing that I did only on the top of the balance, but not big marks like that. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Some watch makers would mark the balance if the hairspring was removed, this was done so when it was replaced it would be in the same spot so there would be no need for beat setting. It is a thing that I did only on the top of the balance, but not big marks like that. 

Same here i mark the position of the stud, i havent seen this though.

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Back in the day movements were finished in batches, so certain parts would get marked to be sure they stay with their piece. A watchmaker might have a compartmented box with 5 or 10 divisions, with smaller divisions in each, for that number of movements. I've seen the markings on pieces that should be later than when things were done so artisanally, but I think in the final stages of finishing and timing in many companies they continued to work in batches. Well, many still do, but with workbenches that hold 50-100 movements on a chain drive actuated by a knee switch, that must be a nightmare job!

Oh wow, you think they would have come up with a better way of keeping the parts together instead of defacing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone- all very interesting. I will mention these are 20s 30s Rolex 600/700 so they likely came from the same place and they have the matching numbers on the plates and cock. I could see them being marked for a batch before they were stamped. They  also have a very faint circle on the top of the wheel what looks like to mark the stud point. I relied on it a bit trying to get the ‘XIII’ in beat. It is also in the same location on the end of the left arm, too…

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I guess some rather nasty way of poising the balance that had a heavy arm and then a correction .Only seen by another watchrepairer. Quick and effective but bodgy.

They’re big gouges so I do wonder if they affected poise. Prolly not removing material but definitely moving some..

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rehajm said:

They’re big gouges so I do wonder if they affected poise. Prolly not removing material but definitely moving some..

I started to think the same but any adjustment i would expect was done after the marks were made. I'm actually gobsmacked that they would mark them in this way. As i understand from research that the Aegler watch company made movements for Rolex up until Rolex bought the company not so long ago. I wonder if it was that factory that marked them up in this way. It would be fascinating to talk to people that worked in these old factories. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fast responses - thank you. Yes, I mentioned the 18000bph to illustrate that it's not a matter of touching coils, over banking, shortened hairspring etc. I even took off the platform and temporarily fitted a another NOS one also with 8 leaves and beating 18000 but the colossal gain is the same. I'm resigned to buying and fitting a new Gorge platform plus a 7 leaf pinion escape wheel but only if I think it will work; otherwise it's a waste of £200 and a couple of hours work. Hence the underlying question is: all other things being equal, what would the timekeeping effect be? Is it a simple 7/8ths as fast? Logic tells me it is but can it be that linear?
    • Sorry to jump in here guys, but I've read through this whole thread and it seems there are a lot of people who think joining Facebook means everyone will have access to their lives. You could make a Facebook account with a fake name. You could even use your real name if you wanted to and set it to completely private so people can't even find you in a search and you don't have to add anyone as a 'friend', so you won't see anyone's posts. Literally use it to join a group full of members of this site. Admins could even set the group to private and require a password of some sort to gain acceptance into the group, so you can be sure that it's only members of this site that get in. @tomh207 is right, the form with email addresses and names is a bad idea. That will be abused by scrapers. Facebook is only as personal as you let it be. You can be completely anonymous on there if you wish. Don't think of it as Facebook. Just think of it as a watch repair group as that's all you'd use the account for. It doesn't even have to be set up with your current email address. Make a random one on Gmail or any other free provider just for the Facebook account. Tagged you by accident and now it won't let me remove it 😂 @Neverenoughwatches
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. Plenty of clock people on here to help you out. 
    • Hi I'm a new member.  I recently pulled a Wakmann 8 hour clock out of one of my small airplanes.  My hope is to get it working again.
    • I have a timex urban command (digital watch with indiglo). Are you aware of any dangerous substance or material that I can come in contact with if I disassemble the watch? For example I read that the indigloo is made of luminescent “indium tin oxide” (as reported here https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Phosphor.html) and that this material can cause irritation to the respiratory tract If inhaled (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indium_tin_oxide). Any other stuff I should be aware of? Thanks in advance for your answers.
×
×
  • Create New...